Literature DB >> 2274611

Pimozide does not impair sweetness discrimination.

P Willner1, M Papp, G Phillips, M Maleeh, R Muscat.   

Abstract

In an initial experiment pimozide decreased preference for a weak sucrose solution but increased preference for a strong solution on the descending limb of the concentration-intake function. As these effects resemble those of dilution, we therefore investigated whether pimozide decreases the perceived intensity of sweet stimuli. Rats were trained to perform a conditional discrimination in a T-maze. A correct response was rewarded by access to a 10% sucrose solution; an incorrect response was punished by confinement in the non-rewarded arm. In the first part of this experiment the discriminative stimulus, located at the choice point of the T-maze, was either water or sucrose, initially a 10% solution, but reduced gradually to 0.0003%. In the second part of the experiment, the discriminative stimulus was either 1% sucrose or a weaker solution, which was initially 0.0001% then raised gradually to 0.5%. Performance fell below 75% accuracy at 0 versus 0.0012% and at 1% versus 0.1%. Pimozide (0.5 mg/kg) administered at these (and other) levels of difficulty decreased running speed but had no effect on discrimination accuracy. As pimozide did not affect either the threshold for sweetness perception or the discrimination of a just noticeable difference, the decreased responsiveness of neuroleptic-treated rats to sweet rewards cannot be explained by a change in the perception of sweetness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2274611     DOI: 10.1007/bf02245934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  14 in total

1.  Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  A Towell; R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Effects of dopamine receptor antagonists on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  The relative attenuation of self-stimulation, eating and drinking produced by dopamine-receptor blockade.

Authors:  E T Rolls; B J Rolls; P H Kelly; S G Shaw; R J Wood; R Dale
Journal:  Psychopharmacologia       Date:  1974

4.  Some effects of pimozide on nondeprived rats licking sucrose solutions in an anhedonia paradigm.

Authors:  S E Gramling; S C Fowler; K R Collins
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Decreased intracranial self-stimulation after neuroleptics or 6-hydroxydopamine: evidence for mediation by motor deficits rather than by reduced reward.

Authors:  H C Fibiger; D A Carter; A G Phillips
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1976-05-05       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Behavior-decrementing effects of low doses of haloperidol result from disruptions in response force and duration.

Authors:  S.C. Fowler; M.A. Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Behav Pharmacol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.293

7.  Hedonic response of rats to polysaccharide and sugar solutions.

Authors:  A Sclafani; A E Clyne
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  The effects of pimozide on the consumption of a palatable saccharin-glucose solution in the rat.

Authors:  S Xenakis; A Sclafani
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.533

9.  Hedonic reactivity to sucrose in rats: modification by pimozide.

Authors:  C S Bailey; S Hsiao; J E King
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986-10

10.  Effects of haloperidol and d-amphetamine on perceived quantity of food and tones.

Authors:  M T Martin-Iverson; D Wilkie; H C Fibiger
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  5 in total

1.  Naloxone administration following operant training of sucrose/water discrimination in the rat.

Authors:  E O O'Hare; J Cleary; P J Bartz; D T Weldon; C J Billington; A S Levine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Reward-dependent suppression or facilitation of consummatory behaviour by raclopride.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 3.  The taste of sugars.

Authors:  Stuart A McCaughey
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 4.  A conceptual and practical guide to the behavioural evaluation of animal models of the symptomatology and therapy of schizophrenia.

Authors:  Benjamin K Yee; Philipp Singer
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 5.249

5.  Suppression or facilitation of operant behaviour by raclopride dependent on concentration of sucrose reward.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.