Literature DB >> 19170427

Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Thomas A Cleland1, Venkata Anupama Narla, Karim Boudadi.   

Abstract

Sensory representations depend strongly on the descending regulation of perceptual processing. Generalization among similar stimuli is a fundamental cognitive process that defines the extent of the variance in physical stimulus properties that becomes categorized together and associated with a common contingency, thereby establishing units of meaning. The olfactory system provides an experimentally tractable model system in which to study the interactions of these physical and psychological factors within the framework of their underlying neurophysiological mechanisms. The authors here show that olfactory associative learning systematically regulates gradients of odor generalization. Specifically, increasing odor-reward pairings, odor concentration, or reward quality--each a determinant of associative learning--significantly transformed olfactory generalization gradients, each narrowing the range of variance in odor quality perceived as likely to share the learned contingency of a conditioned odor stimulus. However, differences in the qualitative features of these three transformations suggest that these different determinants of learning are not necessarily theoretically interchangeable. These results demonstrate that odor representations are substantially shaped by experience and descending influences. (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19170427      PMCID: PMC2632762          DOI: 10.1037/a0013991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  39 in total

1.  Behavioral models of odor similarity.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Alix Morse; Esther L Yue; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.912

2.  Stimulus representation in SOP: I. Theoretical rationalization and some implications.

Authors:  Susan E. Brandon; Edgar H. Vogel; Allan R. Wagner
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2003-04-28       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  Cholinergic modulation in the olfactory bulb influences spontaneous olfactory discrimination in adult rats.

Authors:  Nathalie Mandairon; Casara Jean Ferretti; Conor M Stack; Daniel B Rubin; Thomas A Cleland; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Role of centrifugal projections to the olfactory bulb in olfactory processing.

Authors:  Carly L Kiselycznyk; Steven Zhang; Christiane Linster
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2006-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Distinct neural mechanisms mediate olfactory memory formation at different timescales.

Authors:  Ann Marie McNamara; Phillip D Magidson; Christiane Linster; Donald A Wilson; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2008-02-22       Impact factor: 2.460

6.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science.

Authors:  R N Shepard
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-09-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Behavioral responses to aliphatic aldehydes can be predicted from known electrophysiological responses of mitral cells in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  C Linster; M E Hasselmo
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1999-05

8.  Cholinergic modulation of sensory representations in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul

9.  Maintaining accuracy at the expense of speed: stimulus similarity defines odor discrimination time in mice.

Authors:  Nixon M Abraham; Hartwig Spors; Alan Carleton; Troy W Margrie; Thomas Kuner; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Suppression or facilitation of operant behaviour by raclopride dependent on concentration of sucrose reward.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  27 in total

Review 1.  Function follows form: ecological constraints on odor codes and olfactory percepts.

Authors:  Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  The hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and selective memory retrieval: evidence from a rodent model of the retrieval-induced forgetting effect.

Authors:  Jade Q Wu; Greg J Peters; Pedro Rittner; Thomas A Cleland; David M Smith
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 3.899

3.  Noradrenergic Activity in the Olfactory Bulb Is a Key Element for the Stability of Olfactory Memory.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Maellie Midroit; Jeremy Forest; Yohann Thenaisie; Christina Cho; Marion Richard; Anne Didier; Nathalie Mandairon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Noradrenergic effects on olfactory perception and learning.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Olga Escanilla
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Characterizing olfactory perceptual similarity using carbon chain discrimination in Fischer 344 rats.

Authors:  Wendy M Yoder; Barry Setlow; Jennifer L Bizon; David W Smith
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.160

6.  Imprinted Rasgrf1 expression in neonatal mice affects olfactory learning and memory.

Authors:  N M Drake; L M DeVito; T A Cleland; P D Soloway
Journal:  Genes Brain Behav       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.449

7.  Cholinergic modulation during acquisition of olfactory fear conditioning alters learning and stimulus generalization in mice.

Authors:  Eloisa Pavesi; Allison Gooch; Elizabeth Lee; Max L Fletcher
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 2.460

8.  Exploiting olfactory learning in alien rats to protect birds' eggs.

Authors:  Catherine J Price; Peter B Banks
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  A two-layer biophysical model of cholinergic neuromodulation in olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Guoshi Li; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Compensatory responses to age-related decline in odor quality acuity: cholinergic neuromodulation and olfactory enrichment.

Authors:  Nathalie Mandairon; Shane T Peace; Karim Boudadi; Christine E Boxhorn; Venkata Anupama Narla; Sara D Suffis; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  Neurobiol Aging       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 4.673

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.