Literature DB >> 1798832

Reward-dependent suppression or facilitation of consummatory behaviour by raclopride.

G Phillips1, P Willner, R Muscat.   

Abstract

Rats were presented for 1 h with 0.7%, 7% or 34% sucrose solutions, either separately with water as an alternative (two-bottle test), or with all three concentrations concurrently available (three-bottle test). In trained animals, 7% sucrose produced the highest intakes in the two-bottle test, but 34% sucrose was preferred in the three-bottle test. In both tests the dopamine D-2 antagonist raclopride (100-400 micrograms/kg) reduced intake of 0.7% sucrose solution, but increased intake of 34% sucrose; both effects were apparent during the first 5 min of testing. In the two-bottle test, intake of the intermediate 7% concentration showed both effects: an immediate decrease and a later increase. In the three-bottle test, sucrose-naive animals showed a gradual onset of preference for 34% sucrose, and enhancements of intake by raclopride were not at first immediate; immediate enhancements required three sessions of exposure. Raclopride did not alter the consumption of a 0.001% solution of quinine. We consider the implications of these results for theories of neuroleptic drug action.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1798832     DOI: 10.1007/BF02244430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  22 in total

1.  IS IT POSSIBLE TO PREDICT THE CLINICAL EFFECTS OF NEUROLEPTIC DRUGS (MAJOR TRANQUILLIZERS) FROM ANIMAL DATA?I. "NEUROLEPTIC ACTIVITY SPECTRA" FOR RATS.

Authors:  P A JANSSEN; C J NIEMEGEERS; K H SCHELLEKENS
Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung       Date:  1965-02

2.  Effects of pimozide on sucrose consumption and preference.

Authors:  A Towell; R Muscat; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Summation and saturation properties in the rewarding effect of brain stimulation.

Authors:  E Miliaressis; J Malette
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1987

4.  Relationship of reinforcement value to consummatory behavior.

Authors:  L R Hammer
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-12

5.  Adrenal responses to reinforcement and extinction: role of expectancy versus instrumental responding.

Authors:  C L Coe; M E Stanton; S Levine
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1983-08       Impact factor: 1.912

6.  Pimozide does not impair sweetness discrimination.

Authors:  P Willner; M Papp; G Phillips; M Maleeh; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; D Sampson; J Nunn; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Hedonic reactivity to sucrose in rats: modification by pimozide.

Authors:  C S Bailey; S Hsiao; J E King
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1986-10

Review 9.  Brain dopamine and reward.

Authors:  R A Wise; P P Rompre
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 24.137

10.  Suppression or facilitation of operant behaviour by raclopride dependent on concentration of sucrose reward.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  9 in total

1.  Baclofen, raclopride, and naltrexone differentially affect intake of fat/sucrose mixtures under limited access conditions.

Authors:  K J Wong; F H W Wojnicki; R L W Corwin
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 3.533

2.  Attenuation of sucrose consumption in mice by chronic mild stress and its restoration by imipramine.

Authors:  S Monleon; P D'Aquila; A Parra; V M Simon; P F Brain; P Willner
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Potentiation of the effects of raclopride on sucrose consumption by the 5-HT2 antagonist ritanserin.

Authors:  A M Montgomery; A Suri
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; D Sampson; J Nunn; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Simultaneous anhedonia and exaggerated locomotor activation in an animal model of depression.

Authors:  Thomas Romeas; Marie-Claude Morissette; Ouissame Mnie-Filali; Graciela Piñeyro; Sandra M Boye
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-04-29       Impact factor: 4.530

6.  Genetic variance contributes to dopamine receptor antagonist-induced inhibition of sucrose intake in inbred and outbred mouse strains.

Authors:  Cheryl T Dym; Alexander Pinhas; Magdalena Robak; Anthony Sclafani; Richard J Bodnar
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-25       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Suppression or facilitation of operant behaviour by raclopride dependent on concentration of sucrose reward.

Authors:  G Phillips; P Willner; R Muscat
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 8.  Critical thoughts on current rodent models for evaluating potential treatments of alcohol addiction and withdrawal.

Authors:  Tamzin L Ripley; David N Stephens
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 8.739

9.  Chronic pramipexole treatment increases tolerance for sucrose in normal and ventral tegmental lesioned rats.

Authors:  David Dardou; Carine Chassain; Franck Durif
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.