Literature DB >> 27098641

Experimental investigation of the fracture torque of orthodontic anchorage screws.

Susanne Reimann1,2, Mustafa Ayubi3, Fraser McDonald4, Christoph Bourauel3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In contrast to dental implants that remain in the bone, orthodontic anchorage screws serve as temporary anchorage for orthodontic tooth movement and are removed after completion of treatment. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the stability of various commercially available orthodontic anchorage screws against torsion.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The torsional deflection of ten different orthodontic anchorage screws from different manufacturers [Ortho Easy Pin (Forestadent), Benefit, quattro (both PSM Medical Solutions), Vector TAS (Ormco), AbsoAnchor(®) (DENTOS Inc.), OrthoLox, Dual-Top JA (both Promedia Medizintechnik), TAD (3M Unitek), INFINITAS (ODS) and tomas(®) (Dentaurum)] was tested in vitro in relation to the rotation angle using a self-developed set-up. The screws were positioned in a resin model with bone-like material properties. Shear tests were performed using the manufacturers' own screwdrivers. Ten screws each were turned manually until a sudden drop in the measured torque occurred. At this point, the screw head was twisted off. Fracture torque and the torque at which the screws deformed plastically were evaluated. Mean values and standard deviations were calculated.
RESULTS: According to the German industrial standard, the torque of orthodontic anchorage screws should reach at least 20 Ncm. The majority of the screws reached this nominal torque; however, a few screws fractured before reaching this value. Five screw types displayed plastic deformation below the threshold, at approximately 16 Ncm.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that orthodontic anchorage screws generally meet the requirements of the standard and ensure safe clinical use. However, according to the present data, it may be assumed that a portion of the screws will be plastically deformed upon removal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Deformation; Orthodontic anchorage screw; Patient safety; Stability

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27098641     DOI: 10.1007/s00056-016-0032-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orofac Orthop        ISSN: 1434-5293            Impact factor:   1.938


  21 in total

Review 1.  A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians.

Authors:  Harold M Frost
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The use of microimplants in orthodontic anchorage.

Authors:  Chung-Ho Chen; Chao-San Chang; Chi-Hsin Hsieh; Yu-Chuan Tseng; Yee-Shyong Shen; I-Yueh Huang; Chia-Fu Yang; Chun-Ming Chen
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 3.  The use of miniscrew implants for temporary skeletal anchorage in orthodontics: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Moschos A Papadopoulos; Fadi Tarawneh
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2007-02-21

4.  Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews.

Authors:  Neal D Kravitz; Budi Kusnoto
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Removal torque values of surface-treated mini-implants after loading.

Authors:  Seong-Hun Kim; Jae-Hee Cho; Kyu-Rhim Chung; Yoon-Ah Kook; Gerald Nelson
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Mechanical loading of orthodontic miniscrews - significance and problems: an experimental study.

Authors:  Claudia Reicheneder; Kurt Rottner; Ivan Bokan; Ronald Mai; Günter Lauer; Gerd Richter; Tomasz Gedrange; Peter Proff
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.411

7.  A torque removal study on the primary stability of orthodontic titanium screw mini-implants in the cortical bone of dog femurs.

Authors:  J Okazaki; Y Komasa; D Sakai; A Kamada; T Ikeo; I Toda; F Suwa; M Inoue; T Etoh
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2008-06-12       Impact factor: 2.789

8.  Bone remodeling in response to in vivo fatigue microdamage.

Authors:  D B Burr; R B Martin; M B Schaffler; E L Radin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Fracture resistance of orthodontic mini-implants: a biomechanical in vitro study.

Authors:  Benedict Wilmes; Agamemnon Panayotidis; Dieter Drescher
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Comparison of the fracture torque of different Brazilian mini-implants.

Authors:  Guilherme Machado Alvares de Lima; Mário Sérgio Soares; Sibele Sarti Penha; Marcelo Munhóes Romano
Journal:  Braz Oral Res       Date:  2011 Mar-Apr
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.