R A Delgado-Ruiz1, E Velasco Ortega2, G E Romanos3, S Gerhke4, I Newen5, J L Calvo-Guirado6. 1. School of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Stony Brook University, 1103 Westchester Hall, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8712, USA. rafael.delgado-ruiz@stonybrookmedicine.edu. 2. School of Medicine, Department of General Dentistry, Sevilla University, Sevilla, Spain. 3. School of Dental Medicine, Department of Periodontics, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA. 4. Department of Research, BioTecnos, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. 5. School of Dental Medicine, Department of Prosthodontics and Digital Technology, Stony Brook University, 1103 Westchester Hall, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8712, USA. 6. International Dentistry Research Cathedra, Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia (UCAM), Murcia, Spain.
Abstract
AIMS: To evaluate the real-time bone temperature changes during the preparation of the implant bed with a single-drill protocol with different drill designs and different slow drilling speeds in artificial type IV bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this experimental in vitro study, 600 implant bed preparations were performed in 10 bovine bone disks using three test slow drilling speeds (50/150/300 rpm) and a control drilling speed (1200 rpm). The temperature at crestal and apical areas and time variations produced during drilling with three different drill designs with similar diameter and length but different geometry were recorded with real-life thermographic analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance. Multiple comparisons of temperatures and time with the different drill designs and speeds were performed with the Tukey's test. RESULTS: T Max values for the control drilling speed with all the drill designs (D1 + 1200; D2 + 1200; D3 + 1200) were higher compared to those for the controls for 11 ± 1.32 °C (p < 0.05). The comparison of T Max within the test groups showed that drilling at 50 rpm resulted in the lowest temperature increment (22.11 ± 0.8 °C) compared to the other slow drilling speeds of 150 (24.752 ± 1.1 °C) and 300 rpm (25.977 ± 1.2 °C) (p < 0.042). Temperature behavior at crestal and apical areas was similar being lower for slow drilling speeds compared to that for the control drilling speed. Slow drilling speeds required significantly more time to finish the preparation of the implant bed shown as follows: 50 rpm > 150 rpm > 300 rpm > control (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A single-drill protocol with slow drilling speeds (50, 150, and 300 rpm) without irrigation in type IV bone increases the temperature at the coronal and apical levels but is below the critical threshold of 47 °C. The drill design in single-drill protocols using slow speeds (50, 150, and 300 rpm) does not have an influence on the thermal variations. The time to accomplish the implant bed preparation with a single-drill protocol in type IV bone is influenced by the drilling speed and not by the drill design. As the speed decreases, then more time is required.
AIMS: To evaluate the real-time bone temperature changes during the preparation of the implant bed with a single-drill protocol with different drill designs and different slow drilling speeds in artificial type IV bone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this experimental in vitro study, 600 implant bed preparations were performed in 10 bovine bone disks using three test slow drilling speeds (50/150/300 rpm) and a control drilling speed (1200 rpm). The temperature at crestal and apical areas and time variations produced during drilling with three different drill designs with similar diameter and length but different geometry were recorded with real-life thermographic analysis. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way analysis of variance. Multiple comparisons of temperatures and time with the different drill designs and speeds were performed with the Tukey's test. RESULTS: T Max values for the control drilling speed with all the drill designs (D1 + 1200; D2 + 1200; D3 + 1200) were higher compared to those for the controls for 11 ± 1.32 °C (p < 0.05). The comparison of T Max within the test groups showed that drilling at 50 rpm resulted in the lowest temperature increment (22.11 ± 0.8 °C) compared to the other slow drilling speeds of 150 (24.752 ± 1.1 °C) and 300 rpm (25.977 ± 1.2 °C) (p < 0.042). Temperature behavior at crestal and apical areas was similar being lower for slow drilling speeds compared to that for the control drilling speed. Slow drilling speeds required significantly more time to finish the preparation of the implant bed shown as follows: 50 rpm > 150 rpm > 300 rpm > control (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A single-drill protocol with slow drilling speeds (50, 150, and 300 rpm) without irrigation in type IV bone increases the temperature at the coronal and apical levels but is below the critical threshold of 47 °C. The drill design in single-drill protocols using slow speeds (50, 150, and 300 rpm) does not have an influence on the thermal variations. The time to accomplish the implant bed preparation with a single-drill protocol in type IV bone is influenced by the drilling speed and not by the drill design. As the speed decreases, then more time is required.
Entities:
Keywords:
Bone drilling; Single bur; Slow drilling speed; Thermal analysis
Authors: A Sarendranath; R Khan; N Tovar; C Marin; D Yoo; J Redisch; R Jimbo; P G Coelho Journal: Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2015-04-25 Impact factor: 1.651
Authors: S C Möhlhenrich; M Abouridouane; N Heussen; F Hölzle; F Klocke; A Modabber Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg Date: 2016-06-11 Impact factor: 2.789
Authors: Juan Carlos Bernabeu-Mira; David Soto-Peñaloza; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; Fabio Camacho-Alonso; Rebeca Rivas-Ballester; David Peñarrocha-Oltra Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2021-04-24 Impact factor: 3.573
Authors: József Szalma; Ole Klein; Bálint Viktor Lovász; Edina Lempel; Sára Jeges; Lajos Olasz Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2018-11-19 Impact factor: 3.411