Literature DB >> 26315554

The effect of change in body mass index on volumetric measures of mammographic density.

Vicki Hart1, Katherine W Reeves2, Susan R Sturgeon2, Nicholas G Reich2, Lynnette Leidy Sievert3, Karla Kerlikowske4, Lin Ma4, John Shepherd5, Jeffrey A Tice4, Amir Pasha Mahmoudzadeh5, Serghei Malkov5, Brian L Sprague6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Understanding how changes in body mass index (BMI) relate to changes in mammographic density is necessary to evaluate adjustment for BMI gain/loss in studies of change in density and breast cancer risk. Increase in BMI has been associated with a decrease in percent density, but the effect on change in absolute dense area or volume is unclear.
METHODS: We examined the association between change in BMI and change in volumetric breast density among 24,556 women in the San Francisco Mammography Registry from 2007 to 2013. Height and weight were self-reported at the time of mammography. Breast density was assessed using single x-ray absorptiometry measurements. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between BMI and dense volume (DV), non-dense volume (NDV), and percent dense volume (PDV) were assessed using multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for demographics, risk factors, and reproductive history.
RESULTS: In cross-sectional analysis, BMI was positively associated with DV [β, 2.95 cm(3); 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.69-3.21] and inversely associated with PDV (β, -2.03%; 95% CI, -2.09, -1.98). In contrast, increasing BMI was longitudinally associated with a decrease in both DV (β, -1.01 cm(3); 95% CI, -1.59, -0.42) and PDV (β, -1.17%; 95% CI, -1.31, -1.04). These findings were consistent for both pre- and postmenopausal women.
CONCLUSION: Our findings support an inverse association between change in BMI and change in PDV. The association between increasing BMI and decreasing DV requires confirmation. IMPACT: Longitudinal studies of PDV and breast cancer risk, or those using PDV as an indicator of breast cancer risk, should evaluate adjustment for change in BMI. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26315554      PMCID: PMC4633314          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  31 in total

1.  Volumetric breast density from full-field digital mammograms and its association with breast cancer risk factors: a comparison with a threshold method.

Authors:  Mariëtte Lokate; Michiel G J Kallenberg; Nico Karssemeijer; Maurice A A J Van den Bosch; Petra H M Peeters; Carla H Van Gils
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Novel use of single X-ray absorptiometry for measuring breast density.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Lionel Herve; Jessie Landau; Bo Fan; Karla Kerlikowske; Steve R Cummings
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-04

3.  Measurements of breast density: no ratio for a ratio.

Authors:  Gerco Haars; Paulus A H van Noord; Carla H van Gils; Diederick E Grobbee; Petra H M Peeters
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Limei Sun; Helen Guo; Anna Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Associations of mammographic dense and nondense areas and body mass index with risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Dallas R English; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  John A Shepherd; Karla Kerlikowske; Lin Ma; Frederick Duewer; Bo Fan; Jeff Wang; Serghei Malkov; Eric Vittinghoff; Steven R Cummings
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Terminal duct lobular unit involution of the normal breast: implications for breast cancer etiology.

Authors:  Jonine D Figueroa; Ruth M Pfeiffer; Deesha A Patel; Laura Linville; Louise A Brinton; Gretchen L Gierach; Xiaohong R Yang; Daphne Papathomas; Daniel Visscher; Carolyn Mies; Amy C Degnim; William F Anderson; Stephen Hewitt; Zeina G Khodr; Susan E Clare; Anna Maria Storniolo; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Kathy R Brandt; Alice Wang; Carol Janney; Zachary S Fredericksen; James R Cerhan; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  A pilot study of compositional analysis of the breast and estimation of breast mammographic density using three-dimensional T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Michael Khazen; Ruth M L Warren; Caroline R M Boggis; Emilie C Bryant; Sadie Reed; Iqbal Warsi; Linda J Pointon; Gek E Kwan-Lim; Deborah Thompson; Ros Eeles; Doug Easton; D Gareth Evans; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes.

Authors:  Norman Boyd; Lisa Martin; Anoma Gunasekara; Olga Melnichouk; Gord Maudsley; Chris Peressotti; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  8 in total

1.  Longitudinal Changes in Volumetric Breast Density in Healthy Women across the Menopausal Transition.

Authors:  Natalie J Engmann; Christopher Scott; Matthew R Jensen; Stacey J Winham; Lin Ma; Kathleen R Brandt; Amir Mahmoudzadeh; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Fang-Fang Wu; Aaron D Norman; Robert A Hiatt; John Heine; John Shepherd; V Shane Pankratz; Diana L Miglioretti; Karla Kerlikowske; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Variation in Mammographic Breast Density Assessments Among Radiologists in Clinical Practice: A Multicenter Observational Study.

Authors:  Brian L Sprague; Emily F Conant; Tracy Onega; Michael P Garcia; Elisabeth F Beaber; Sally D Herschorn; Constance D Lehman; Anna N A Tosteson; Ronilda Lacson; Mitchell D Schnall; Despina Kontos; Jennifer S Haas; Donald L Weaver; William E Barlow
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Adiposity Change Over the Life Course and Mammographic Breast Density in Postmenopausal Women.

Authors:  Yunan Han; Catherine S Berkey; Cheryl R Herman; Catherine M Appleton; Aliya Alimujiang; Graham A Colditz; Adetunji T Toriola
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-02-26

Review 5.  Docosahexaenoic Acid in Combination with Dietary Energy Restriction for Reducing the Risk of Obesity Related Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Manni; Karam El-Bayoumy; Henry Thompson
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Association of mammographic density with blood DNA methylation.

Authors:  Rachel M Lucia; Wei-Lin Huang; Andrea Alvarez; Irene Masunaka; Argyrios Ziogas; Deborah Goodman; Andrew O Odegaard; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Hannah Lui Park
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 4.861

7.  Persistent spatial clusters of high body mass index in a Swiss urban population as revealed by the 5-year GeoCoLaus longitudinal study.

Authors:  Stéphane Joost; Solange Duruz; Pedro Marques-Vidal; Murielle Bochud; Silvia Stringhini; Fred Paccaud; Jean-Michel Gaspoz; Jean-Marc Theler; Joël Chételat; Gérard Waeber; Peter Vollenweider; Idris Guessous
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Mammographic density changes in surgical weight loss-an indication for personalized screening.

Authors:  Natalia Partain; Ali Mokdad; Nancy Puzziferri; Jessica Porembka; Stephen Seiler; Alana Christie; Deborah Farr; Aeisha Rivers; A Marilyn Leitch; Rachel Wooldridge; James Huth; Roshni Rao
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 1.930

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.