Literature DB >> 28062399

Longitudinal Study of Mammographic Density Measures That Predict Breast Cancer Risk.

Kavitha Krishnan1, Laura Baglietto1,2,3,4, Jennifer Stone1,5, Julie A Simpson1, Gianluca Severi6, Christopher F Evans1, Robert J MacInnis1,2, Graham G Giles1,2,7, Carmel Apicella1, John L Hopper8,9,10.   

Abstract

Background: After adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI), mammographic measures-dense area (DA), percent dense area (PDA), and nondense area (NDA)-are associated with breast cancer risk. Our aim was to use longitudinal data to estimate the extent to which these risk-predicting measures track over time.
Methods: We collected 4,320 mammograms (age range, 24-83 years) from 970 women in the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study and the Australian Breast Cancer Family Registry. Women had on average 4.5 mammograms (range, 1-14). DA, PDA, and NDA were measured using the Cumulus software and normalized using the Box-Cox method. Correlations in the normalized risk-predicting measures over time intervals of different lengths were estimated using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling of Gompertz curves.
Results: Mean normalized DA and PDA were constant with age to the early 40s, decreased over the next two decades, and were almost constant from the mid-60s onward. Mean normalized NDA increased nonlinearly with age. After adjusting for age and BMI, the within-woman correlation estimates for normalized DA were 0.94, 0.93, 0.91, 0.91, and 0.91 for mammograms taken 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 years apart, respectively. Similar correlations were estimated for the age- and BMI-adjusted normalized PDA and NDA.Conclusions: The mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk are highly correlated over time.Impact: This has implications for etiologic research and clinical management whereby women at increased risk could be identified at a young age (e.g., early 40s or even younger) and recommended appropriate screening and prevention strategies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(4); 651-60. ©2017 AACR. ©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28062399      PMCID: PMC5380555          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.254


  22 in total

1.  The Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study.

Authors:  G G Giles; D R English
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  2002

2.  A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Ian Pagano; Galina Lurie; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Explaining variance in the cumulus mammographic measures that predict breast cancer risk: a twins and sisters study.

Authors:  Tuong L Nguyen; Daniel F Schmidt; Enes Makalic; Gillian S Dite; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Minh Bui; Robert J Macinnis; Fabrice Odefrey; Jennifer N Cawson; Susan A Treloar; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Associations of mammographic dense and nondense areas and body mass index with risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Laura Baglietto; Kavitha Krishnan; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Melissa C Southey; Dallas R English; John L Hopper; Graham G Giles
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Breast cancer in Australian women under the age of 40.

Authors:  M R McCredie; G S Dite; G G Giles; J L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Mammographic densities during the menopausal transition: a longitudinal study of Australian-born women.

Authors:  Janet R Guthrie; Roger L Milne; John L Hopper; Jennifer Cawson; Lorraine Dennerstein; Henry G Burger
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.953

7.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Gillian S Dite; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Dallas R English; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; David Tritchler; Anna Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; John L Hopper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Age-specific trends in mammographic density: the Minnesota Breast Cancer Family Study.

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; V Shane Pankratz; Thomas A Sellers; Kathy R Brandt; Alice Wang; Carol Janney; Zachary S Fredericksen; James R Cerhan; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-04-02       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Prospective estimation of rates of change in mammographic parenchymal patterns: influence of age and of hormone replacement therapy.

Authors:  Jonathan P Myles; Tiina Salmininen; Stephen W Duffy; Teresa C Prevost; Nicholas E Day; Matti Hakama
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 10.  Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andreas Pettersson; Rebecca E Graff; Giske Ursin; Isabel Dos Santos Silva; Valerie McCormack; Laura Baglietto; Celine Vachon; Marije F Bakker; Graham G Giles; Kee Seng Chia; Kamila Czene; Louise Eriksson; Per Hall; Mikael Hartman; Ruth M L Warren; Greg Hislop; Anna M Chiarelli; John L Hopper; Kavitha Krishnan; Jingmei Li; Qing Li; Ian Pagano; Bernard A Rosner; Chia Siong Wong; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Gertraud Maskarinec; Norman F Boyd; Carla H van Gils; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  14 in total

1.  Adolescent caffeine consumption and mammographic breast density in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Shannan Rich; Kathleen Egan; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Eur J Nutr       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 5.614

2.  Intake of dietary carbohydrates in early adulthood and adolescence and breast density among young women.

Authors:  Seungyoun Jung; Olga Goloubeva; Nola Hylton; Catherine Klifa; Erin LeBlanc; John Shepherd; Linda Snetselaar; Linda Van Horn; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Gut microbiome, body weight, and mammographic breast density in healthy postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Volker Mai; Xuefeng Wang; Maria Ukhanova; Maximiliano Tagliamonte; Yessica C Martinez; Shannan N Rich; Kathleen M Egan
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 2.506

4.  Associations of Oral Contraceptives with Mammographic Breast Density in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Carmen Smotherman; John Heine; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 4.090

5.  CHDS: A national treasure that keeps on giving.

Authors:  Suzanne E Fenton; Linda S Birnbaum
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.143

6.  Growth Trajectories, Breast Size, and Breast-Tissue Composition in a British Prebirth Cohort of Young Women.

Authors:  Rachel Denholm; Bianca De Stavola; John H Hipwell; Simon J Doran; Marta C Busana; Martin O Leach; David J Hawkes; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Simplified Breast Risk Tool Integrating Questionnaire Risk Factors, Mammographic Density, and Polygenic Risk Score: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi; Peter Kraft; Chi Gao; Yi Mu; Christopher Scott; Stacey J Winham; Celine M Vachon; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.090

8.  Mammographic density and ageing: A collaborative pooled analysis of cross-sectional data from 22 countries worldwide.

Authors:  Anya Burton; Gertraud Maskarinec; Beatriz Perez-Gomez; Celine Vachon; Hui Miao; Martín Lajous; Ruy López-Ridaura; Megan Rice; Ana Pereira; Maria Luisa Garmendia; Rulla M Tamimi; Kimberly Bertrand; Ava Kwong; Giske Ursin; Eunjung Lee; Samera A Qureshi; Huiyan Ma; Sarah Vinnicombe; Sue Moss; Steve Allen; Rose Ndumia; Sudhir Vinayak; Soo-Hwang Teo; Shivaani Mariapun; Farhana Fadzli; Beata Peplonska; Agnieszka Bukowska; Chisato Nagata; Jennifer Stone; John Hopper; Graham Giles; Vahit Ozmen; Mustafa Erkin Aribal; Joachim Schüz; Carla H Van Gils; Johanna O P Wanders; Reza Sirous; Mehri Sirous; John Hipwell; Jisun Kim; Jong Won Lee; Caroline Dickens; Mikael Hartman; Kee-Seng Chia; Christopher Scott; Anna M Chiarelli; Linda Linton; Marina Pollan; Anath Arzee Flugelman; Dorria Salem; Rasha Kamal; Norman Boyd; Isabel Dos-Santos-Silva; Valerie McCormack
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  A comprehensive tool for measuring mammographic density changes over time.

Authors:  Mikael Eriksson; Jingmei Li; Karin Leifland; Kamila Czene; Per Hall
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Density and tailored breast cancer screening: practice and prediction - an overview.

Authors:  Georg J Wengert; Thomas H Helbich; Panagiotis Kapetas; Pascal At Baltzer; Katja Pinker
Journal:  Acta Radiol Open       Date:  2018-09-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.