Literature DB >> 20354074

Physical activity and change in mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Shannon M Conroy1, Lesley M Butler, Danielle Harvey, Ellen B Gold, Barbara Sternfeld, Nina Oestreicher, Gail A Greendale, Laurel A Habel.   

Abstract

One potential mechanism by which physical activity may protect against breast cancer is by decreasing mammographic density. Percent mammographic density, the proportion of dense breast tissue area to total breast area, declines with age and is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. The authors hypothesized that women who were more physically active would have a greater decline in percent mammographic density with age, compared with less physically active women. The authors tested this hypothesis using longitudinal data (1996-2004) from 722 participants in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a multiethnic cohort of women who were pre- and early perimenopausal at baseline, with multivariable, repeated-measures linear regression analyses. During an average of 5.6 years, the mean annual decline in percent mammographic density was 1.1% (standard deviation = 0.1). A 1-unit increase in total physical activity score was associated with a weaker annual decline in percent mammographic density by 0.09% (standard error = 0.03; P = 0.01). Physical activity was inversely associated with the change in nondense breast area (P < 0.01) and not associated with the change in dense breast area (P = 0.17). Study results do not support the hypothesis that physical activity reduces breast cancer through a mechanism that includes reduced mammographic density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20354074      PMCID: PMC2877475          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  25 in total

1.  Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States).

Authors:  C M Vachon; C C Kuni; K Anderson; V E Anderson; T A Sellers
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  A longitudinal study of the effects of menopause on mammographic features.

Authors:  Norman Boyd; Lisa Martin; Jennifer Stone; Laurie Little; Salomon Minkin; Martin Yaffe
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  A longitudinal investigation of mammographic density: the multiethnic cohort.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Ian Pagano; Galina Lurie; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  The detection of changes in mammographic densities.

Authors:  G Ursin; M A Astrahan; M Salane; Y R Parisky; J G Pearce; J R Daniels; M C Pike; D V Spicer
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk.

Authors:  C H van Gils; J H Hendriks; R Holland; N Karssemeijer; J D Otten; H Straatman; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Prev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.497

6.  Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trial.

Authors:  Anne McTiernan; Christopher F Martin; Jennifer D Peck; Aaron K Aragaki; Rowan T Chlebowski; Etta D Pisano; C Y Wang; Robert L Brunner; Karen C Johnson; JoAnn E Manson; Cora E Lewis; Jane M Kotchen; Barbara S Hulka
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Physical activity patterns in a diverse population of women.

Authors:  B Sternfeld; B E Ainsworth; C P Quesenberry
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.018

8.  Pre-diagnosis physical activity and mammographic density in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Melinda L Irwin; Erin J Aiello; Anne McTiernan; Richard N Baumgartner; Kathy B Baumgartner; Leslie Bernstein; Frank D Gilliland; Rachel Ballard-Barbash
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-11-30       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Physical activity in relation to mammographic density in the dutch prospect-European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition cohort.

Authors:  Karijn P M Suijkerbuijk; Fränzel J B Van Duijnhoven; Carla H Van Gils; Paulus A H Van Noord; Petra H M Peeters; Christine M Friedenreich; Evelyn M Monninkhof
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  Genetic determinants of mammographic density.

Authors:  Christopher A Haiman; Leslie Bernstein; David Berg; Sue A Ingles; Martine Salane; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  Physical activity and health during the menopausal transition.

Authors:  Barbara Sternfeld; Sheila Dugan
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.844

3.  Mammographic density: intersection of advocacy, science, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Katherine Tossas-Milligan; Sundus Shalabi; Veronica Jones; Patricia J Keely; Matthew W Conklin; Kevin W Elicerie; Robert Winn; Christopher Sistrunk; Joseph Geradts; Gustavo Miranda-Carboni; Eric C Dietze; Lisa D Yee; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2019-07-24

4.  Performance of digital screening mammography in a population-based cohort of black and white women.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad Benefield; Sarah J Nyante; Mary W Marsh; Mikael Anne Greenwood-Hickman; Bruce F Schroeder
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 2.506

5.  Association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and change in mammographic density over time in the SWAN mammographic density subcohort.

Authors:  Kunlanat Makboon; Ellen B Gold; Danielle J Harvey; Lesley M Butler; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 2.506

6.  Relationship Between Breast Density and Selective Estrogen-Receptor Modulators, Aromatase Inhibitors, Physical Activity, and Diet: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ernest U Ekpo; Patrick C Brennan; Claudia Mello-Thoms; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Adolescent and young adult exposure to physical activity and breast density.

Authors:  Kelley Pettee Gabriel; Catherine Klifa; Adriana Pérez; Andrea M Kriska; Robin R High; Linda Snetselaar; Joanne F Dorgan
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Menopausal vasomotor symptoms and incident breast cancer risk in the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation.

Authors:  Vicki Hart; Susan R Sturgeon; Nicholas Reich; Lynnette Leidy Sievert; Sybil L Crawford; Ellen B Gold; Nancy E Avis; Katherine W Reeves
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Between-Race Differences in Supplemental Breast Cancer Screening Before and After Breast Density Notification Law.

Authors:  Mark Manning; Terrance L Albrecht; Suzanne O'Neill; Kristen Purrington
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 5.532

10.  Physical activity and mammographic density in a cohort of postmenopausal Norwegian women; a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Samera Azeem Qureshi; Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Solveig Hofvind; Anna H Wu; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2012-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.