Literature DB >> 18378579

Visual disability, visual function, and myopia among rural chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES)--report 1.

Nathan Congdon1, Yunfei Wang, Yue Song, Kai Choi, Mingzhi Zhang, Zhongxia Zhou, Zhenling Xie, Liping Li, Xueyu Liu, Abhishek Sharma, Bin Wu, Dennis S C Lam.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual acuity, visual function, and prevalence of refractive error among Chinese secondary-school children in a cross-sectional school-based study.
METHODS: Uncorrected, presenting, and best corrected visual acuity, cycloplegic autorefraction with refinement, and self-reported visual function were assessed in a random, cluster sample of rural secondary school students in Xichang, China.
RESULTS: Among the 1892 subjects (97.3% of the consenting children, 84.7% of the total sample), mean age was 14.7 +/- 0.8 years, 51.2% were female, and 26.4% were wearing glasses. The proportion of children with uncorrected, presenting, and corrected visual disability (< or = 6/12 in the better eye) was 41.2%, 19.3%, and 0.5%, respectively. Myopia < -0.5, < -2.0, and < -6.0 D in both eyes was present in 62.3%, 31.1%, and 1.9% of the subjects, respectively. Among the children with visual disability when tested without correction, 98.7% was due to refractive error, while only 53.8% (414/770) of these children had appropriate correction. The girls had significantly (P < 0.001) more presenting visual disability and myopia < -2.0 D than did the boys. More myopic refractive error was associated with worse self-reported visual function (ANOVA trend test, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Visual disability in this population was common, highly correctable, and frequently uncorrected. The impact of refractive error on self-reported visual function was significant. Strategies and studies to understand and remove barriers to spectacle wear are needed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18378579     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-1160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  42 in total

1.  Increases in the prevalence of reduced visual acuity and myopia in Chinese children in Guangzhou over the past 20 years.

Authors:  F Xiang; M He; Y Zeng; J Mai; K A Rose; I G Morgan
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error.

Authors:  T S T Smith; K D Frick; B A Holden; T R Fricke; K S Naidoo
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  Progressive Myopia and Lid Suture Myopia are Explained by the Same Feedback Process: a Mathematical Model of Myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina; Peter R Greene
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2015-06

4.  Effect of undercorrection on myopia progression in 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Si Yuan Li; Shi-Ming Li; Yue Hua Zhou; Luo Ru Liu; He Li; Meng Tian Kang; Si Yan Zhan; Ningli Wang; Michel Millodot
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results.

Authors:  Padmaja Sankaridurg; Leslie Donovan; Saulius Varnas; Arthur Ho; Xiang Chen; Aldo Martinez; Scott Fisher; Zhi Lin; Earl L Smith; Jian Ge; Brien Holden
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 6.  Histological changes of high axial myopia.

Authors:  J B Jonas; L Xu
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 3.775

7.  The child self-refraction study results from urban Chinese children in Guangzhou.

Authors:  Mingguang He; Nathan Congdon; Graeme MacKenzie; Yangfa Zeng; Joshua D Silver; Leon Ellwein
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 8.  Changes in axial length after orthokeratology lens treatment for myopia: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Meng Guan; Weijia Zhao; Yu Geng; Yang Zhang; Jia Ma; Zonghan Chen; Mingqian Peng; Yan Li
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Myopia stabilization and associated factors among participants in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET).

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Juvenile Myopia. Predicting the Progression Rate.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Antonio Medina
Journal:  Mathews J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.