Literature DB >> 26032395

Effect of undercorrection on myopia progression in 12-year-old children.

Si Yuan Li1, Shi-Ming Li, Yue Hua Zhou, Luo Ru Liu, He Li, Meng Tian Kang, Si Yan Zhan, Ningli Wang, Michel Millodot.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To prospectively observe the effects of undercorrection of myopia on myopia progression and axial elongation in a population of 12-year-old Chinese children.
METHODS: A total of 2,267 children in the Anyang Childhood Eye Study were examined at baseline, and 1,769 were followed for 1 year. Ocular examinations included cycloplegic autorefraction, axial length, visual acuity, vertometry, and accommodative lag. Questionnaires were completed by children and parents. Undercorrection of myopia was determined at baseline if presenting visual acuity could be improved by at least 2 lines with subjective refraction.
RESULTS: Of 253 myopic children with spectacles and available information, 120 (47.4 %) were undercorrected (-4.63D  to -0.50D) and 133 (52.6 %) were fully corrected. In a multivariate model adjusting for age, gender, number of myopic parents, time spent on near work and outdoor activities per day, usage and time for wearing spectacles per day, children with undercorrection had significantly more baseline myopia (P < 0.01) and longer axial length (P = 0.03) than children with full correction. However, there were no significant differences in myopia progression (P = 0.46) and axial elongation (P = 0.96) at 1 year between the two groups of children. The regression analysis showed that myopia progression significantly decreased with increasing amount of undercorrection (r (2) = 0.02, P = 0.02) in all children. Accommodative lag significantly decreased with increasing amounts of undercorrection (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on this 1-year study in Chinese children, undercorrection or full correction of myopia by wearing spectacles did not show any differences in myopia progression or axial elongation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26032395     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-015-3053-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  30 in total

1.  Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally.

Authors:  J R Phillips
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 2.  Visual regulation of refractive development: insights from animal studies.

Authors:  E L Smith; L-F Hung; B Arumugam
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 3.  Myopia.

Authors:  Ian G Morgan; Kyoko Ohno-Matsui; Seang-Mei Saw
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-05       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Need and challenges of refractive correction in urban Chinese school children.

Authors:  Mingguang He; Jingjing Xu; Qiuxia Yin; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Refractive error in children in a rural population in India.

Authors:  Rakhi Dandona; Lalit Dandona; Marmamula Srinivas; Prashant Sahare; Saggam Narsaiah; Sergio R Muñoz; Gopal P Pokharel; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Effects of spectacle intervention on the progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  E Ong; K Grice; R Held; F Thorn; J Gwiazda
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Undercorrection of myopia enhances rather than inhibits myopia progression.

Authors:  Kahmeng Chung; Norhani Mohidin; Daniel J O'Leary
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Visual disability, visual function, and myopia among rural chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES)--report 1.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Yunfei Wang; Yue Song; Kai Choi; Mingzhi Zhang; Zhongxia Zhou; Zhenling Xie; Liping Li; Xueyu Liu; Abhishek Sharma; Bin Wu; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  The prevalence of visual impairment in school children of upper-middle socioeconomic status in Kathmandu.

Authors:  Yuddha D Sapkota; Bishwa Nath Adhikari; Gopal P Pokharel; Bimal K Poudyal; Leon B Ellwein
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.648

10.  Time outdoors and physical activity as predictors of incident myopia in childhood: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jeremy A Guggenheim; Kate Northstone; George McMahon; Andy R Ness; Kevin Deere; Calum Mattocks; Beate St Pourcain; Cathy Williams
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  17 in total

1.  Detecting the effect of under-correcting myopia.

Authors:  Antonio Medina
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Effect of uncorrection versus full correction on myopia progression in 12-year-old children.

Authors:  Yun-Yun Sun; Shi-Ming Li; Si-Yuan Li; Meng-Tian Kang; Luo-Ru Liu; Bo Meng; Feng-Ju Zhang; Michel Millodot; Ningli Wang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Achieving Optimal Correction for Young Myopic Children: A Concept Study.

Authors:  Sara Bøgelund Rasmussen; Flemming Møller; Trine Møldrup Jakobsen
Journal:  Biomed Hub       Date:  2022-01-31

4.  Part-time Versus Full-time Spectacles for Myopia Control (ParMA Study): A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Efthymia Prousali; Anna-Bettina Haidich; Anna Dastiridou; Argyrios Tzamalis; Nikolaos Ziakas; Asimina Mataftsi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 5.  Myopia: Mechanisms and Strategies to Slow Down Its Progression.

Authors:  Andrea Russo; Alessandro Boldini; Davide Romano; Giuseppina Mazza; Stefano Bignotti; Francesco Morescalchi; Francesco Semeraro
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 1.974

6.  Juvenile Myopia. Predicting the Progression Rate.

Authors:  Peter R Greene; Antonio Medina
Journal:  Mathews J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-13

Review 7.  Pharmacogenomic Approach to Antimyopia Drug Development: Pathways Lead the Way.

Authors:  Tatiana V Tkatchenko; Andrei V Tkatchenko
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2019-10-30       Impact factor: 14.819

8.  The prevalence of vision impairment and refractive error in 3654 first year students at Tianjin Medical University.

Authors:  Xue-Ying Shi; Yi-Feng Ke; Nan Jin; Hong-Mei Zhang; Rui-Hua Wei; Xiao-Rong Li
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Comparison of Refractive Measures of Three Autorefractors in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Shuyu Xiong; Minzhi Lv; Haidong Zou; Jianfeng Zhu; Lina Lu; Bo Zhang; Junjie Deng; Chunxia Yao; Xiangui He; Xun Xu
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Genome-wide analysis of retinal transcriptome reveals common genetic network underlying perception of contrast and optical defocus detection.

Authors:  Tatiana V Tkatchenko; Andrei V Tkatchenko
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.