Literature DB >> 19565121

Potential lost productivity resulting from the global burden of uncorrected refractive error.

T S T Smith1, K D Frick, B A Holden, T R Fricke, K S Naidoo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the potential global economic productivity loss associated with the existing burden of visual impairment from uncorrected refractive error (URE).
METHODS: Conservative assumptions and national population, epidemiological and economic data were used to estimate the purchasing power parity-adjusted gross domestic product (PPP-adjusted GDP) loss for all individuals with impaired vision and blindness, and for individuals with normal sight who provide them with informal care.
FINDINGS: An estimated 158.1 million cases of visual impairment resulted from uncorrected or undercorrected refractive error in 2007; of these, 8.7 million were blind. We estimated the global economic productivity loss in international dollars (I$) associated with this burden at I$ 427.7 billion before, and I$ 268.8 billion after, adjustment for country-specific labour force participation and employment rates. With the same adjustment, but assuming no economic productivity for individuals aged > 50 years, we estimated the potential productivity loss at I$ 121.4 billion.
CONCLUSION: Even under the most conservative assumptions, the total estimated productivity loss, in $I, associated with visual impairment from URE is approximately a thousand times greater than the global number of cases. The cost of scaling up existing refractive services to meet this burden is unknown, but if each affected individual were to be provided with appropriate eyeglasses for less than I$ 1000, a net economic gain may be attainable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19565121      PMCID: PMC2686211          DOI: 10.2471/blt.08.055673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bull World Health Organ        ISSN: 0042-9686            Impact factor:   9.408


  15 in total

Review 1.  Socioeconomic status and blindness.

Authors:  R Dandona; L Dandona
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  The magnitude and cost of global blindness: an increasing problem that can be alleviated.

Authors:  Kevin D Frick; Allen Foster
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Presbyopia: prevalence, impact, and interventions.

Authors:  Ilesh Patel; Sheila K West
Journal:  Community Eye Health       Date:  2007-09

4.  Global magnitude of visual impairment caused by uncorrected refractive errors in 2004.

Authors:  Serge Resnikoff; Donatella Pascolini; Silvio P Mariotti; Gopal P Pokharel
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 9.408

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for refractive errors in an adult inner city population.

Authors:  J Katz; J M Tielsch; A Sommer
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Parental myopia, near work, school achievement, and children's refractive error.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; Melvin L Moeschberger; Lisa A Jones; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 7.  The rationale for shifting from a voluntary clinical approach to a public health approach in addressing refractive errors.

Authors:  Jerry E Vincent; Matthew G Pearce; Janet Leasher; Derek Mladenovich; Nita Patel
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 8.  Myopic and hyperopic refractive error in adults: an overview.

Authors:  Leslie Hyman
Journal:  Ophthalmic Epidemiol       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.648

9.  Visual disability, visual function, and myopia among rural chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES)--report 1.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Yunfei Wang; Yue Song; Kai Choi; Mingzhi Zhang; Zhongxia Zhou; Zhenling Xie; Liping Li; Xueyu Liu; Abhishek Sharma; Bin Wu; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Revision of visual impairment definitions in the International Statistical Classification of Diseases.

Authors:  Lalit Dandona; Rakhi Dandona
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  95 in total

1.  Large dynamic range autorefraction with a low-cost diffuser wavefront sensor.

Authors:  Gregory N McKay; Faisal Mahmood; Nicholas J Durr
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.732

2.  Global cost of correcting vision impairment from uncorrected refractive error.

Authors:  T R Fricke; B A Holden; D A Wilson; G Schlenther; K S Naidoo; S Resnikoff; K D Frick
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 9.408

3.  The universal eye health imperative for Canada: an inescapable reality of unmet need.

Authors:  Diane van Staden
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2020-03-03

4.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

5.  The acute effect of atropine eye drops on the human full-field electroretinogram.

Authors:  Safal Khanal; Sachi Nitinkumar Rathod; John R Phillips
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.379

6.  Preventing Myopia.

Authors:  Wolf A Lagrèze; Frank Schaeffel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Refractive error and visual function difficulty in a Latino population.

Authors:  Rasanamar K Sandhu; Beatriz E Munoz; Bonnielin K Swenor; Sheila K West
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Refractive surgery: the most cost-saving technique in refractive errors correction.

Authors:  Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi; Cyrus Alinia; Maryam Tavakkoli; Alireza Lashay; Hormoz Chams
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Assessing the Genetic Predisposition of Education on Myopia: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Authors:  Gabriel Cuellar-Partida; Yi Lu; Pik Fang Kho; Alex W Hewitt; H-Erich Wichmann; Seyhan Yazar; Dwight Stambolian; Joan E Bailey-Wilson; Robert Wojciechowski; Jie Jin Wang; Paul Mitchell; David A Mackey; Stuart MacGregor
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.135

10.  Prevalence and predictors of refractive error and spectacle coverage in Nakuru, Kenya: a cross-sectional, population-based study.

Authors:  Andrew Bastawrous; Wanjiku Mathenge; Allen Foster; Hannah Kuper
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 2.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.