Literature DB >> 20622703

Spectacle lenses designed to reduce progression of myopia: 12-month results.

Padmaja Sankaridurg1, Leslie Donovan, Saulius Varnas, Arthur Ho, Xiang Chen, Aldo Martinez, Scott Fisher, Zhi Lin, Earl L Smith, Jian Ge, Brien Holden.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the results of 12-month wear of three novel spectacle lens designs intended to reduce peripheral hyperopic defocus and one standard design control lens and their effect on the progression of myopia in Chinese children aged 6 to 16 years.
METHODS: Chinese children (n = 210) with myopia (-0.75 D to -3.50 D sphere, cylinder <or=-1.50 D) were randomized to one of four groups wearing either one of three novel spectacle lens designs (types I, II, or III) or conventional, single-vision spectacle lenses. Data were collected at 6 and 12 months. Primary and secondary outcome measures were the changes in central cycloplegic auto-refraction and eye axial length, respectively. Peripheral refraction along the horizontal meridian (nasal and temporal) was taken at baseline with and without spectacle lenses. Multivariate linear regression was used to adjust analyses for important covariates.
RESULTS: Progression in eyes wearing control spectacle lenses at 6 and 12 months was -0.55 D +/- 0.35 D and -0.78 +/- 0.50 D, respectively. For the entire group, no statistically significant differences were observed in the rates of progression with the novel designs in comparison to control spectacle lenses. However, in younger children (6 to 12 years) with parental history of myopia (n = 100), there was significantly less progression (-0.68 D +/- 0.47 D vs. -0.97 D +/- 0.48 D) with lens type III compared with control spectacles (mean difference, 0.29 D, std error, 0.11, p = 0.038).
CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistically significant differences in the rate of progression of myopia between the control and novel lens wearing eyes for the age group 6 to 16 years. The finding of reduced progression of myopia with type III lens design in younger children with parental myopia needs to be validated in a more targeted study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20622703      PMCID: PMC4696394          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e3181ea19c7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  25 in total

1.  Progression of myopia in Hong Kong Chinese schoolchildren is slowed by wearing progressive lenses.

Authors:  J T Leung; B Brown
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 2.  Homeostasis of eye growth and the question of myopia.

Authors:  Josh Wallman; Jonathan Winawer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Role of parental myopia in the progression of myopia and its interaction with treatment in COMET children.

Authors:  Daniel Kurtz; Leslie Hyman; Jane E Gwiazda; Ruth Manny; Li Ming Dong; Ying Wang; Mitchell Scheiman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  The effectiveness of progressive addition lenses on the progression of myopia in Chinese children.

Authors:  Zhikuan Yang; Weizhong Lan; Jian Ge; Wen Liu; Xiang Chen; Linxin Chen; Minbin Yu
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  High myopia and glaucoma susceptibility the Beijing Eye Study.

Authors:  Liang Xu; Yaxing Wang; Shuang Wang; Yun Wang; Jost B Jonas
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Lens thickness changes among schoolchildren in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yung-Feng Shih; Ting-Hsuan Chiang; Luke L-K Lin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Two-year multicenter, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel safety and efficacy study of 2% pirenzepine ophthalmic gel in children with myopia.

Authors:  R Michael Siatkowski; Susan A Cotter; R S Crockett; Joseph M Miller; Gary D Novack; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2008-03-24       Impact factor: 1.220

8.  Accommodation and related risk factors associated with myopia progression and their interaction with treatment in COMET children.

Authors:  Jane E Gwiazda; Leslie Hyman; Thomas T Norton; Mohamed E M Hussein; Wendy Marsh-Tootle; Ruth Manny; Ying Wang; Donald Everett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Visual disability, visual function, and myopia among rural chinese secondary school children: the Xichang Pediatric Refractive Error Study (X-PRES)--report 1.

Authors:  Nathan Congdon; Yunfei Wang; Yue Song; Kai Choi; Mingzhi Zhang; Zhongxia Zhou; Zhenling Xie; Liping Li; Xueyu Liu; Abhishek Sharma; Bin Wu; Dennis S C Lam
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-03-31       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Refractive error, axial length, and relative peripheral refractive error before and after the onset of myopia.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; John R Hayes; G Lynn Mitchell; Lisa A Jones; Melvin L Moeschberger; Susan A Cotter; Robert N Kleinstein; Ruth E Manny; J Daniel Twelker; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  46 in total

1.  Protective effects of high ambient lighting on the development of form-deprivation myopia in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Earl L Smith; Li-Fang Hung; Juan Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Walline; Kristina Lindsley; Satyanarayana S Vedula; Susan A Cotter; Donald O Mutti; J Daniel Twelker
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

3.  Progressive-addition lenses versus single-vision lenses for slowing progression of myopia in children with high accommodative lag and near esophoria.

Authors: 
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-04-25       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 4.  Practical applications to modify and control the development of ametropia.

Authors:  P R Sankaridurg; B A Holden
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Optical treatment strategies to slow myopia progression: effects of the visual extent of the optical treatment zone.

Authors:  Earl L Smith
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.467

Review 6.  Myopia, an underrated global challenge to vision: where the current data takes us on myopia control.

Authors:  B Holden; P Sankaridurg; E Smith; T Aller; M Jong; M He
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 7.  Clinical management of progressive myopia.

Authors:  T A Aller
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  A randomized trial using progressive addition lenses to evaluate theories of myopia progression in children with a high lag of accommodation.

Authors:  David A Berntsen; Loraine T Sinnott; Donald O Mutti; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-02-13       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Prentice Award Lecture 2010: A case for peripheral optical treatment strategies for myopia.

Authors:  Earl L Smith
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Myopia prevalence in Canadian school children: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mike Yang; Doerte Luensmann; Desmond Fonn; Jill Woods; Debbie Jones; Keith Gordon; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 3.775

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.