Literature DB >> 18373599

A systematical analysis of in vivo contact forces on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention.

Yasuo Okumura1, Susan B Johnson, T Jared Bunch, Benhur D Henz, Christine J O'Brien, Douglas L Packer.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: While catheter tip/tissue contact has been shown to be an important determinant of ablative lesions in in vitro studies, the impact of contact on the outcomes of mapping and ablation in the intact heart has not been evaluated. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Twelve dogs underwent atrial ablation guided by the Senesitrade mark robotic catheter remote control system. After intracardiac ultrasound (ICE) validation of contact force measured by an in-line mechanical sensor, the relationship between contact force and individual lesion formation was established during irrigated-tipped ablation (flow 17 mL/sec) at 15 watts for 30 seconds. Minimal contact by ICE correlated with force of 4.7 +/- 5.8 grams, consistent contact 9.9 +/- 8.6 grams and tissue tenting produced 25.0 +/- 14.0 grams. Conversely, catheter tip/tissue contact by ICE was predicted by contact force. A contact force of 10-20 and > or =20 grams generated full-thickness, larger volume ablative lesions than that created with <10 grams (98 +/- 69 and 89 +/- 70 mm(3) vs 40 +/- 42 mm(3), P < 0.05). Moderate (10 grams) and marked contact (15-20 grams) application produced 1.5 X greater electroanatomic map volumes that were seen with minimal contact (5 grams) (26 +/- 3 cm(3) vs 33 +/- 6, 39 +/- 3 cm(3), P < 0.05). The electroanatomic map/CT merge process was also more distorted when mapping was generated at moderate to marked contact force.
CONCLUSION: This study shows that mapping and ablation using a robotic sheath guidance system are critically dependent on generated force. These findings suggest that ablative lesion size is optimized by the application of 10-20 grams of contact force, although mapping requires lower-force application to avoid image distortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18373599     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2008.01135.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  36 in total

1.  General anesthesia improves contact force and reduces gap formation in pulmonary vein isolation: a comparison with conscious sedation.

Authors:  Akio Chikata; Takeshi Kato; Takanori Yaegashi; Satoru Sakagami; Chieko Kato; Takahiro Saeki; Keiichi Kawai; Shin-Ichiro Takashima; Hisayoshi Murai; Soichiro Usui; Hiroshi Furusho; Shuichi Kaneko; Masayuki Takamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-03-04       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  THERMOCOOL® SMARTTOUCH® CATHETER - The Evidence So Far for Contact Force Technology and the Role of VISITAG™ MODULE.

Authors:  Tina Lin; Feifan Ouyang; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Roland Tilz
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2014-05-30

3.  Remote robotic catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: how fast is it learned and what benefits can be earned?

Authors:  Andreas Rillig; Udo Meyerfeldt; Ralf Birkemeyer; Fabian Treusch; Markus Kunze; Tomislav Miljak; Vlada Zvereva; Werner Jung
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Effect of catheter movement and contact during application of radiofrequency energy on ablation lesion characteristics.

Authors:  Matthew D Olson; Nicholas Phreaner; Joseph L Schuller; Duy T Nguyen; David F Katz; Ryan G Aleong; Wendy S Tzou; Raphael Sung; Paul D Varosy; William H Sauer
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Thermal expansion imaging for monitoring lesion depth using M-mode ultrasound during cardiac RF ablation: in vitro study.

Authors:  Peter Baki; Sergio J Sanabria; Gabor Kosa; Gabor Szekely; Orcun Goksel
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Design and evaluation of safety operation VR training system for robotic catheter surgery.

Authors:  Yu Wang; Shuxiang Guo; Yaxin Li; Takashi Tamiya; Yu Song
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Contact Force and Atrial Fibrillation Ablation.

Authors:  W Ullah; R J Schilling; T Wong
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Simultaneous assessment of contact pressure and local electrical coupling index using robotic navigation.

Authors:  Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano Fassini; Michela Casella; Fabrizio Bologna; Osama Al-Nono; Daniele Colombo; Viviana Biagioli; Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; Martina Zucchetti; Benedetta Majocchi; Vittoria Marino; Joseph J Gallinghouse; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 1.900

9.  Which is the best catheter to perform atrial fibrillation ablation? A comparison between standard ThermoCool, SmartTouch, and Surround Flow catheters.

Authors:  Luigi Sciarra; Paolo Golia; Andrea Natalizia; Ermenegildo De Ruvo; Serena Dottori; Antonio Scarà; Alessio Borrelli; Lucia De Luca; Marco Rebecchi; Alessandro Fagagnini; Alberto Bandini; Fabrizio Guarracini; Marcello Galvani; Leonardo Calò
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 1.900

10.  Impact of real-time contact force and impedance measurement in pulmonary vein isolation procedures for treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Reza Wakili; Sebastian Clauss; Viola Schmidt; Michael Ulbrich; Anton Hahnefeld; Franziska Schüssler; Johannes Siebermair; Stefan Kääb; Heidi L Estner
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.