Literature DB >> 24633546

Simultaneous assessment of contact pressure and local electrical coupling index using robotic navigation.

Antonio Dello Russo1, Gaetano Fassini, Michela Casella, Fabrizio Bologna, Osama Al-Nono, Daniele Colombo, Viviana Biagioli, Pasquale Santangeli, Luigi Di Biase, Martina Zucchetti, Benedetta Majocchi, Vittoria Marino, Joseph J Gallinghouse, Andrea Natale, Claudio Tondo.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Contact with cardiac tissue is a determinant of lesion efficacy during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The Sensei®X Robotic Catheter System (Hansen Medical, CA) has been validated for contact force sensing. The electrical coupling index (ECI) from the EnSite Contact™ system (St. Jude Medical, MN) has been validated as an indicator of tissue contact. We aimed at analyzing ECI behavior during radiofrequency (RF) pulses maintaining a stable contact through the robotic navigation contact system.
METHODS: In 15 patients (age, 59 ± 12) undergoing AF ablation, pulmonary vein (PV) isolation was guided by the Sensei®X System, employing the Contact™ catheter.
RESULTS: During the procedure, we assessed ECI changes associated with adequate contact based on the IntelliSense® force-sensing technology (Hansen Medical, CA. Baseline contact (27 ± 8 g/cm(2)) ECI value was 99 ± 13, whereas ECI values in a noncontact site (0 g/cm(2)) and in a light contact site (1-10 g/cm(2)) were respectively 66 ± 12 and 77 ± 10 (p < 0.0001). Baseline contact ECI values were not different depending on AF presentation (paroxysmal AF, 98 ± 9; persistent AF, 100 ± 9) or on cardiac rhythm (sinus rhythm, 97 ± 7; AF,101 ± 10). In all PVs, ECI was significantly reduced during and after ablation (ECI during RF, 56 ± 15; ECI after RF, 72 ± 16; p < 0.001). A mean reduction of 32.2% during RF delivery and 25.4% immediately after RF discontinuation compared with baseline ECI was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Successful PV isolation is associated with a significant decrease in ECI of at least 20 %. This may be used as a surrogate marker of effective lesion in AF ablation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24633546     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-014-9882-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

1.  Electrode impedance: an indicator of electrode-tissue contact and lesion dimensions during linear ablation.

Authors:  X Zheng; G P Walcott; J A Hall; D L Rollins; W M Smith; G N Kay; R E Ideker
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Electrogram-guided radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial tissue comparison with thermometry-guide ablation: comparison with thermometry-guide ablation.

Authors:  D Schwartzman; J J Michele; C T Trankiem; J F Ren
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  Contact sensing provides a highly accurate means to titrate radiofrequency ablation lesion depth.

Authors:  Douglas Holmes; Jeffrey M Fish; Israel A Byrd; Jeremy D Dando; Steven J Fowler; Hong Cao; James A Jensen; Harry A Puryear; Larry A Chinitz
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-11-29

4.  2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused updates incorporated into the ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines.

Authors:  Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; Davis S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; G Neal Kay; Jean-Yves Le Huezey; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; L Samuel Wann; Sidney C Smith; Silvia G Priori; N A Mark Estes; Michael D Ezekowitz; Warren M Jackman; Craig T January; James E Lowe; Richard L Page; David J Slotwiner; William G Stevenson; Cynthia M Tracy; Alice K Jacobs; Jeffrey L Anderson; Nancy Albert; Christopher E Buller; Mark A Creager; Steven M Ettinger; Robert A Guyton; Jonathan L Halperin; Judith S Hochman; Frederick G Kushner; Erik Magnus Ohman; William G Stevenson; Lynn G Tarkington; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  2012 HRS/EHRA/ECAS expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: recommendations for patient selection, procedural techniques, patient management and follow-up, definitions, endpoints, and research trial design.

Authors:  Hugh Calkins; Karl Heinz Kuck; Riccardo Cappato; Josep Brugada; A John Camm; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; John DiMarco; James Edgerton; Kenneth Ellenbogen; Michael D Ezekowitz; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Gerhard Hindricks; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Jose Jalife; Pierre Jais; Jonathan Kalman; David Keane; Young-Hoon Kim; Paulus Kirchhof; George Klein; Hans Kottkamp; Koichiro Kumagai; Bruce D Lindsay; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Douglas L Packer; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Vivek Reddy; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; David Wilber
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Use of electrical coupling information in AF catheter ablation: a prospective randomized pilot study.

Authors:  Thomas Gaspar; Haris Sih; Gerhard Hindricks; Charlotte Eitel; Philipp Sommer; Simon Kircher; Sascha Rolf; Arash Arya; Liane Teplitsky; Christopher Piorkowski
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 6.343

7.  Radiofrequency catheter ablation using cooled electrodes: impact of irrigation flow rate and catheter contact pressure on lesion dimensions.

Authors:  Christian Weiss; Matthias Antz; Olaf Eick; Kablai Eshagzaiy; Thomas Meinertz; Stephan Willems
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Importance of catheter contact force during irrigated radiofrequency ablation: evaluation in a porcine ex vivo model using a force-sensing catheter.

Authors:  Aravinda Thiagalingam; Andre D'Avila; Lori Foley; J Luis Guerrero; Hendrik Lambert; Giovanni Leo; Jeremy N Ruskin; Vivek Y Reddy
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2010-02-01

9.  Atrial fibrillation ablation using a robotic catheter remote control system: initial human experience and long-term follow-up results.

Authors:  Walid Saliba; Vivek Y Reddy; Oussama Wazni; Jennifer E Cummings; J David Burkhardt; Michel Haissaguerre; Josef Kautzner; Petr Peichl; Petr Neuzil; Volker Schibgilla; Georg Noelker; Johannes Brachmann; Luigi Di Biase; Conor Barrett; Pierre Jais; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-06-24       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Contact force sensing technology identifies sites of inadequate contact and reduces acute pulmonary vein reconnection: a prospective case control study.

Authors:  Shouvik Haldar; Julian W E Jarman; Sandeep Panikker; David G Jones; Tushar Salukhe; Dhiraj Gupta; Gareth Wynn; Wajid Hussain; Vias Markides; Tom Wong
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.164

View more
  5 in total

1.  The benefit of tissue contact monitoring with an electrical coupling index during ablation of typical atrial flutter--a prospective randomised control trial.

Authors:  Michael A Jones; David Webster; Kelvin C K Wong; Christopher Hayes; Norman Qureshi; Kim Rajappan; Yaver Bashir; Timothy R Betts
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  Increasing the Single-Procedure Success Rate of Pulmonary Vein Isolation.

Authors:  Mattias Duytschaever; Mark O'Neill; Martin Martinek
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  Use of impedance-based catheter tip-to-tissue contact assessment (electroanatomic coupling index, ECI) in typical right atrial flutter ablation.

Authors:  Massimiliano Maines; Francesco Peruzza; Alessandro Zorzi; Domenico Catanzariti; Carlo Angheben; Maurizio Del Greco
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-04-21       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Analysis of catheter contact force during atrial fibrillation ablation using the robotic navigation system: results from a randomized study.

Authors:  Antonio Dello Russo; Gaetano Fassini; Sergio Conti; Michela Casella; Antonio Di Monaco; Eleonora Russo; Stefania Riva; Massimo Moltrasio; Fabrizio Tundo; Giuseppe De Martino; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale; Claudio Tondo
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.900

5.  Introducing a novel catheter-tissue contact feedback feature in robotic navigated catheter ablation: Utility, feasibility, and safety.

Authors:  Anna Maria Elisabeth Noten; Tamas Géczy; Sing-Chien Yap; Zsuzsanna Kis; Tamas Szili-Torok
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2020-05-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.