Literature DB >> 31046373

Amplitude modulation detection and modulation masking in school-age children and adults.

Emily Buss1, Christian Lorenzi2, Laurianne Cabrera3, Lori J Leibold4, John H Grose1.   

Abstract

Two experiments were performed to better understand on- and off-frequency modulation masking in normal-hearing school-age children and adults. Experiment 1 estimated thresholds for detecting 16-, 64- or 256-Hz sinusoidal amplitude modulation (AM) imposed on a 4300-Hz pure tone. Thresholds tended to improve with age, with larger developmental effects for 64- and 256-Hz AM than 16-Hz AM. Detection of 16-Hz AM was also measured with a 1000-Hz off-frequency masker tone carrying 16-Hz AM. Off-frequency modulation masking was larger for younger than older children and adults when the masker was gated with the target, but not when the masker was continuous. Experiment 2 measured detection of 16- or 64-Hz sinusoidal AM carried on a bandpass noise with and without additional on-frequency masker AM. Children and adults demonstrated modulation masking with similar tuning to modulation rate. Rate-dependent age effects for AM detection on a pure-tone carrier are consistent with maturation of temporal resolution, an effect that may be obscured by modulation masking for noise carriers. Children were more susceptible than adults to off-frequency modulation masking for gated stimuli, consistent with maturation in the ability to listen selectively in frequency, but the children were not more susceptible to on-frequency modulation masking than adults.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31046373      PMCID: PMC6909994          DOI: 10.1121/1.5098950

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  52 in total

1.  Auditory stream segregation on the basis of amplitude-modulation rate.

Authors:  Nicolas Grimault; Sid P Bacon; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Characterizing frequency selectivity for envelope fluctuations.

Authors:  S D Ewert; T Dau
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Effects of simulated cochlear-implant processing on speech reception in fluctuating maskers.

Authors:  Michael K Qin; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Overriding auditory attentional capture.

Authors:  Polly Dalton; Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2007-02

5.  Development of temporal resolution in children as measured by the temporal modulation transfer function.

Authors:  J W Hall; J H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Detection of sinusoidal amplitude modulation at unexpected rates.

Authors:  B A Wright; H Dai
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Modulation interference in detection and discrimination of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  W A Yost; S Sheft; J Opie
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Modulation masking: effects of modulation frequency, depth, and phase.

Authors:  S P Bacon; D W Grantham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Modulation masking within and across carriers for subjects with normal and impaired hearing.

Authors:  Aleksander Sek; Thomas Baer; William Crinnion; Alastair Springgay; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in "steady" background noise.

Authors:  Michael A Stone; Christian Füllgrabe; Robert C Mackinnon; Brian C J Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  1 in total

1.  The development of auditory temporal processing during the first year of life.

Authors:  Laurianne Cabrera; Bonnie K Lau
Journal:  Hearing Balance Commun       Date:  2022-02-02
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.