Literature DB >> 22352505

Comodulation masking release in speech identification with real and simulated cochlear-implant hearing.

Antje Ihlefeld1, Barbara G Shinn-Cunningham, Robert P Carlyon.   

Abstract

For normal-hearing (NH) listeners, masker energy outside the spectral region of a target signal can improve target detection and identification, a phenomenon referred to as comodulation masking release (CMR). This study examined whether, for cochlear implant (CI) listeners and for NH listeners presented with a "noise vocoded" CI simulation, speech identification in modulated noise is improved by a co-modulated flanking band. In Experiment 1, NH listeners identified noise-vocoded speech in a background of on-target noise with or without a flanking narrow band of noise outside the spectral region of the target. The on-target noise and flanker were either 16-Hz square-wave modulated with the same phase or were unmodulated; the speech was taken from a closed-set corpus. Performance was better in modulated than in unmodulated noise, and this difference was slightly greater when the comodulated flanker was present, consistent with a small CMR of about 1.7 dB for noise-vocoded speech. Experiment 2, which tested CI listeners using the same speech materials, found no advantage for modulated versus unmodulated maskers and no CMR. Thus although NH listeners can benefit from CMR even for speech signals with reduced spectro-temporal detail, no CMR was observed for CI users.
© 2012 Acoustical Society of America

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352505      PMCID: PMC9014238          DOI: 10.1121/1.3676701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Understanding speech in modulated interference: cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.

Authors:  Peggy B Nelson; Su-Hyun Jin; Arlene Earley Carney; David A Nelson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effect of amplitude modulation coherence for masked speech signals filtered into narrow bands.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Joseph W Wall; John H Grose
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 3.  The psychophysics and physiology of comodulation masking release.

Authors:  Jesko L Verhey; Daniel Pressnitzer; Ian M Winter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Speech intelligibility as a function of the number of channels of stimulation for signal processors using sine-wave and noise-band outputs.

Authors:  M F Dorman; P C Loizou; D Rainey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; Geraldine Nogaki
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-04-22

6.  Auditory stream formation affects comodulation masking release retroactively.

Authors:  Torsten Dau; Stephan Ewert; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.

Authors:  Dan Gnansia; Vincent Jourdes; Christian Lorenzi
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-02-02       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Comodulation masking release for three types of modulator as a function of modulation rate.

Authors:  R P Carlyon; S Buus; M Florentine
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Comodulation masking release (CMR): effects of signal frequency, flanking-band frequency, masker bandwidth, flanking-band level, and monotic versus dichotic presentation of the flanking band.

Authors:  G P Schooneveldt; B C Moore
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Comodulation masking release in electric hearing.

Authors:  Robert H Pierzycki; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-11

2.  Developmental Conductive Hearing Loss Reduces Modulation Masking Release.

Authors:  Antje Ihlefeld; Yi-Wen Chen; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2016 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

3.  Brainstem Correlates of Comodulation Masking Release for Speech in Normal Hearing Adults.

Authors:  Soheila Rostami; Abdollah Moossavi; Mohsen Ahadi; Shohreh Jalaei
Journal:  J Audiol Otol       Date:  2018-04-17

4.  The role of temporal coherence and temporal predictability in the build-up of auditory grouping.

Authors:  Joseph Sollini; Katarina C Poole; Dominic Blauth-Muszkowski; Jennifer K Bizley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 4.996

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.