Literature DB >> 18339803

X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells.

Susana S Silva1, Rebecca K Rowntree, Shila Mekhoubad, Jeannie T Lee.   

Abstract

With the potential to give rise to all somatic cell types, human embryonic stem cells (hESC) have generated enormous interest as agents of cell replacement therapy. One potential limitation is their safety in vivo. Although several studies have focused on concerns over genomic stability ex vivo, few have analyzed epigenetic stability. Here, we use tools of the epigenetic phenomenon, X-chromosome inactivation (XCI), to investigate their epigenetic properties. Among 11 distinct hESC lines, we find a high degree of variability. We show that, like mouse ESC, hESC in principle have the capacity to recapitulate XCI when induced to differentiate in culture (class I lines). However, this capacity is seen in few hESC isolates. Many hESC lines have already undergone XCI (class II and III). Unexpectedly, there is a tendency to lose XIST RNA expression during culture (class III). Despite losing H3-K27 trimethylation, the inactive X of class III lines remains transcriptionally suppressed, as indicated by Cot-1 RNA exclusion. We conclude that hESC lines are subject to dynamic epigenetic reprogramming ex vivo. Given that XCI and cell differentiation are tightly linked, we consider implications for hESC pluripotency and differentiation potential.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18339803      PMCID: PMC2290799          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0712136105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  25 in total

1.  An ectopic human XIST gene can induce chromosome inactivation in postdifferentiation human HT-1080 cells.

Authors:  Lisa L Hall; Meg Byron; Kosuke Sakai; Laura Carrel; Huntington F Willard; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Derivation of embryonic stem-cell lines from human blastocysts.

Authors:  Chad A Cowan; Irina Klimanskaya; Jill McMahon; Jocelyn Atienza; Jeannine Witmyer; Jacob P Zucker; Shunping Wang; Cynthia C Morton; Andrew P McMahon; Doug Powers; Douglas A Melton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-03-03       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Embryonic stem cell lines from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro.

Authors:  B E Reubinoff; M F Pera; C Y Fong; A Trounson; A Bongso
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  The roles of supernumerical X chromosomes and XIST expression in testicular germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Takahiro Kawakami; Keisei Okamoto; Hiroyuki Sugihara; Takanori Hattori; Anthony E Reeve; Osamu Ogawa; Yusaku Okada
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Sequential X chromosome inactivation coupled with cellular differentiation in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  M Monk; M I Harper
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-09-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Gene expression patterns in human embryonic stem cells and human pluripotent germ cell tumors.

Authors:  Jamie M Sperger; Xin Chen; Jonathan S Draper; Jessica E Antosiewicz; Chris H Chon; Sunita B Jones; James D Brooks; Peter W Andrews; Patrick O Brown; James A Thomson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-10-31       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected.

Authors:  Lisa L Hall; Meg Byron; John Butler; Klaus A Becker; Angel Nelson; Michal Amit; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Janet Stein; Gary Stein; Carol Ware; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  J Cell Physiol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 6.384

8.  Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts.

Authors:  J A Thomson; J Itskovitz-Eldor; S S Shapiro; M A Waknitz; J J Swiergiel; V S Marshall; J M Jones
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-11-06       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Gene trap as a tool for genome annotation and analysis of X chromosome inactivation in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Sujoy K Dhara; Nissim Benvenisty
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-29       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  The human X-inactivation centre is not required for maintenance of X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  C J Brown; H F Willard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-03-10       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  138 in total

Review 1.  The lesser known story of X chromosome reactivation: a closer look into the reprogramming of the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Eriona Hysolli; Yong Wook Jung; Yoshiaki Tanaka; Kun-Yong Kim; In-Hyun Park
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-01-15       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 2.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

3.  Tracking the progression of the human inner cell mass during embryonic stem cell derivation.

Authors:  Thomas O'Leary; Björn Heindryckx; Sylvie Lierman; David van Bruggen; Jelle J Goeman; Mado Vandewoestyne; Dieter Deforce; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Petra De Sutter
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liu; Yifei Yin; Yonghua Jiang; Chaohui Kou; Yumei Luo; Shengchang Huang; Yuhong Zheng; Shaoying Li; Qing Li; Liyuan Guo; Shaorong Gao; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Pluripotency and cellular reprogramming: facts, hypotheses, unresolved issues.

Authors:  Jacob H Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.

Authors:  Pablo Bermejo-Alvarez; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Alfonso Gutierrez-Adan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.272

7.  Female human iPSCs retain an inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Jason Tchieu; Edward Kuoy; Mark H Chin; Hung Trinh; Michaela Patterson; Sean P Sherman; Otaren Aimiuwu; Anne Lindgren; Shahrad Hakimian; Jerome A Zack; Amander T Clark; April D Pyle; William E Lowry; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Derivation conditions impact X-inactivation status in female human induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Kiichiro Tomoda; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Karen Leung; Aki Okada; Megumi Narita; N Alice Yamada; Kirsten E Eilertson; Peter Tsang; Shiro Baba; Mark P White; Salma Sami; Deepak Srivastava; Bruce R Conklin; Barbara Panning; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 24.633

9.  Molecular signatures of human induced pluripotent stem cells highlight sex differences and cancer genes.

Authors:  Montserrat C Anguera; Ruslan Sadreyev; Zhaoqing Zhang; Attila Szanto; Bernhard Payer; Steven D Sheridan; Showming Kwok; Stephen J Haggarty; Mriganka Sur; Jason Alvarez; Alexander Gimelbrant; Maisam Mitalipova; James E Kirby; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 24.633

Review 10.  Searching for naïve human pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Simone Aparecida Siqueira Fonseca; Roberta Montero Costas; Lygia Veiga Pereira
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2015-04-26       Impact factor: 5.326

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.