Literature DB >> 25914771

Searching for naïve human pluripotent stem cells.

Simone Aparecida Siqueira Fonseca1, Roberta Montero Costas1, Lygia Veiga Pereira1.   

Abstract

Normal mouse pluripotent stem cells were originally derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocysts and shown to be the in vitro equivalent of those pre-implantation embryonic cells, and thus were called embryonic stem cells (ESCs). More than a decade later, pluripotent cells were isolated from the ICM of human blastocysts. Despite being called human ESCs, these cells differ significantly from mouse ESCs, including different morphology and mechanisms of control of pluripotency, suggesting distinct embryonic origins of ESCs from the two species. Subsequently, mouse pluripotent stem cells were established from the ICM-derived epiblast of post-implantation embryos. These mouse epiblast stem cells (EpiSCs) are morphological and epigenetically more similar to human ESCs. This raised the question of whether cells from the human ICM are in a more advanced differentiation stage than their murine counterpart, or whether the available culture conditions were not adequate to maintain those human cells in their in vivo state, leading to a transition into EpiSC-like cells in vitro. More recently, novel culture conditions allowed the conversion of human ESCs into mouse ESC-like cells called naïve (or ground state) human ESCs, and the derivation of naïve human ESCs from blastocysts. Here we will review the characteristics of each type of pluripotent stem cells, how (and whether) these relate to different stages of embryonic development, and discuss the potential implications of naïve human ESCs in research and therapy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epiblast stem cells; Human embryonic stem cells; Naïve pluripotent stem cells; X chromosome inactivation

Year:  2015        PMID: 25914771      PMCID: PMC4404399          DOI: 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i3.649

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Stem Cells        ISSN: 1948-0210            Impact factor:   5.326


  61 in total

1.  Generation of rat and human induced pluripotent stem cells by combining genetic reprogramming and chemical inhibitors.

Authors:  Wenlin Li; Wei Wei; Saiyong Zhu; Jinliang Zhu; Yan Shi; Tongxiang Lin; Ergeng Hao; Alberto Hayek; Hongkui Deng; Sheng Ding
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  Derivation of embryonic stem cell lines from parthenogenetically developing rat blastocysts.

Authors:  Masumi Hirabayashi; Teppei Goto; Chihiro Tamura; Makoto Sanbo; Hiromasa Hara; Megumi Kato-Itoh; Hideyuki Sato; Toshihiro Kobayashi; Hiromitsu Nakauchi; Shinichi Hochi
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Derivation of pre-X inactivation human embryonic stem cells under physiological oxygen concentrations.

Authors:  Christopher J Lengner; Alexander A Gimelbrant; Jennifer A Erwin; Albert Wu Cheng; Matthew G Guenther; G Grant Welstead; Raaji Alagappan; Garrett M Frampton; Ping Xu; Julien Muffat; Sandro Santagata; Doug Powers; C Brent Barrett; Richard A Young; Jeannie T Lee; Rudolf Jaenisch; Maisam Mitalipova
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Primate-specific endogenous retrovirus-driven transcription defines naive-like stem cells.

Authors:  Jichang Wang; Gangcai Xie; Manvendra Singh; Avazeh T Ghanbarian; Tamás Raskó; Attila Szvetnik; Huiqiang Cai; Daniel Besser; Alessandro Prigione; Nina V Fuchs; Gerald G Schumann; Wei Chen; Matthew C Lorincz; Zoltán Ivics; Laurence D Hurst; Zsuzsanna Izsvák
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The endoderm of the mouse embryo arises by dynamic widespread intercalation of embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.

Authors:  Gloria S Kwon; Manuel Viotti; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 6.  Anatomy of a blastocyst: cell behaviors driving cell fate choice and morphogenesis in the early mouse embryo.

Authors:  Nadine Schrode; Panagiotis Xenopoulos; Anna Piliszek; Stephen Frankenberg; Berenika Plusa; Anna-Katerina Hadjantonakis
Journal:  Genesis       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 2.487

7.  Stochastic patterning in the mouse pre-implantation embryo.

Authors:  Jens-Erik Dietrich; Takashi Hiiragi
Journal:  Development       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 6.868

8.  Derivation of naive human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Carol B Ware; Angelique M Nelson; Brigham Mecham; Jennifer Hesson; Wenyu Zhou; Erica C Jonlin; Antonio J Jimenez-Caliani; Xinxian Deng; Christopher Cavanaugh; Savannah Cook; Paul J Tesar; Jeffrey Okada; Lilyana Margaretha; Henrik Sperber; Michael Choi; C Anthony Blau; Piper M Treuting; R David Hawkins; Vincenzo Cirulli; Hannele Ruohola-Baker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Rapid and efficient reprogramming of somatic cells to induced pluripotent stem cells by retinoic acid receptor gamma and liver receptor homolog 1.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Jian Yang; Hui Liu; Dong Lu; Xiongfeng Chen; Zenon Zenonos; Lia S Campos; Roland Rad; Ge Guo; Shujun Zhang; Allan Bradley; Pentao Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 10.  Human pre-implantation embryo development.

Authors:  Kathy K Niakan; Jinnuo Han; Roger A Pedersen; Carlos Simon; Renee A Reijo Pera
Journal:  Development       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.868

View more
  3 in total

1.  Increasing The Genetic Admixture of Available Lines of Human Pluripotent Stem Cells.

Authors:  Fabiano A Tofoli; Maximiliano Dasso; Mariana Morato-Marques; Kelly Nunes; Lucas Assis Pereira; Giselle Siqueira da Silva; Simone A S Fonseca; Roberta Montero Costas; Hadassa Campos Santos; Alexandre da Costa Pereira; Paulo A Lotufo; Isabela M Bensenor; Diogo Meyer; Lygia Veiga Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Differentiation of oligodendrocyte progenitor cells from dissociated monolayer and feeder-free cultured pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Tomoko Yamashita; Yuki Miyamoto; Yoshio Bando; Takashi Ono; Sakurako Kobayashi; Ayano Doi; Toshihiro Araki; Yosuke Kato; Takayuki Shirakawa; Yutaka Suzuki; Junji Yamauchi; Shigetaka Yoshida; Naoya Sato
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Early X chromosome inactivation during human preimplantation development revealed by single-cell RNA-sequencing.

Authors:  Joana C Moreira de Mello; Gustavo R Fernandes; Maria D Vibranovski; Lygia V Pereira
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.