Literature DB >> 18340642

X-inactivation reveals epigenetic anomalies in most hESC but identifies sublines that initiate as expected.

Lisa L Hall1, Meg Byron, John Butler, Klaus A Becker, Angel Nelson, Michal Amit, Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor, Janet Stein, Gary Stein, Carol Ware, Jeanne B Lawrence.   

Abstract

The clinical and research value of human embryonic stem cells (hESC) depends upon maintaining their epigenetically naïve, fully undifferentiated state. Inactivation of one X chromosome in each cell of mammalian female embryos is a paradigm for one of the earliest steps in cell specialization through formation of facultative heterochromatin. Mouse ES cells are derived from the inner cell mass (ICM) of blastocyst stage embryos prior to X-inactivation, and cultured murine ES cells initiate this process only upon differentiation. Less is known about human X-inactivation during early development. To identify a human ES cell model for X-inactivation and study differences in the epigenetic state of hESC lines, we investigated X-inactivation in all growth competent, karyotypically normal, NIH approved, female hESC lines and several sublines. In the vast majority of undifferentiated cultures of nine lines examined, essentially all cells exhibit hallmarks of X-inactivation. However, subcultures of any hESC line can vary in X-inactivation status, comprising distinct sublines. Importantly, we identified rare sublines that have not yet inactivated Xi and retain competence to undergo X-inactivation upon differentiation. Other sublines exhibit defects in counting or maintenance of XIST expression on Xi. The few hESC sublines identified that have not yet inactivated Xi may reflect the earlier epigenetic state of the human ICM and represent the most promising source of NIH hESC for study of human X-inactivation. The many epigenetic anomalies seen indicate that maintenance of fully unspecialized cells, which have not formed Xi facultative heterochromatin, is a delicate epigenetic balance difficult to maintain in culture. (c) 2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18340642      PMCID: PMC3057623          DOI: 10.1002/jcp.21411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Physiol        ISSN: 0021-9541            Impact factor:   6.384


  35 in total

1.  Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture.

Authors:  M Amit; M K Carpenter; M S Inokuma; C P Chiu; C P Harris; M A Waknitz; J Itskovitz-Eldor; J A Thomson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  An ectopic human XIST gene can induce chromosome inactivation in postdifferentiation human HT-1080 cells.

Authors:  Lisa L Hall; Meg Byron; Kosuke Sakai; Laura Carrel; Huntington F Willard; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ectopic XIST transcripts in human somatic cells show variable expression and localization.

Authors:  J C Chow; L L Hall; J B Lawrence; C J Brown
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice.

Authors:  D Humpherys; K Eggan; H Akutsu; K Hochedlinger; W M Rideout ; D Biniszkiewicz; R Yanagimachi; R Jaenisch
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Low-copy-number human transgene is recognized as an X inactivation center in mouse ES cells, but fails to induce cis-inactivation in chimeric mice.

Authors:  B R Migeon; H Winter; E Kazi; A K Chowdhury; A Hughes; C Haisley-Royster; H Morrison; P Jeppesen
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 5.736

7.  Variability of X chromosome inactivation: effect on levels of TIMP1 RNA and role of DNA methylation.

Authors:  Catherine L Anderson; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Characterization of expression at the human XIST locus in somatic, embryonal carcinoma, and transgenic cell lines.

Authors:  Jennifer C Chow; Lisa L Hall; Christine M Clemson; Jeanne B Lawrence; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.736

9.  Differential histone H3 Lys-9 and Lys-27 methylation profiles on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Claire Rougeulle; Julie Chaumeil; Kavitha Sarma; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Philip Avner; Edith Heard
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  A chromosomal memory triggered by Xist regulates histone methylation in X inactivation.

Authors:  Alexander Kohlmaier; Fabio Savarese; Monika Lachner; Joost Martens; Thomas Jenuwein; Anton Wutz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  54 in total

Review 1.  Gracefully ageing at 50, X-chromosome inactivation becomes a paradigm for RNA and chromatin control.

Authors:  Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Genetic and epigenetic X-chromosome variations in a parthenogenetic human embryonic stem cell line.

Authors:  Weiqiang Liu; Yifei Yin; Yonghua Jiang; Chaohui Kou; Yumei Luo; Shengchang Huang; Yuhong Zheng; Shaoying Li; Qing Li; Liyuan Guo; Shaorong Gao; Xiaofang Sun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Solving the "X" in embryos and stem cells.

Authors:  Pablo Bermejo-Alvarez; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Alfonso Gutierrez-Adan
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.272

4.  Female human iPSCs retain an inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  Jason Tchieu; Edward Kuoy; Mark H Chin; Hung Trinh; Michaela Patterson; Sean P Sherman; Otaren Aimiuwu; Anne Lindgren; Shahrad Hakimian; Jerome A Zack; Amander T Clark; April D Pyle; William E Lowry; Kathrin Plath
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 24.633

5.  Molecular signatures of human induced pluripotent stem cells highlight sex differences and cancer genes.

Authors:  Montserrat C Anguera; Ruslan Sadreyev; Zhaoqing Zhang; Attila Szanto; Bernhard Payer; Steven D Sheridan; Showming Kwok; Stephen J Haggarty; Mriganka Sur; Jason Alvarez; Alexander Gimelbrant; Maisam Mitalipova; James E Kirby; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 24.633

6.  Reestablishment of the inactive X chromosome to the ground state through cell fusion-induced reprogramming.

Authors:  Hyun Woo Choi; Jong Soo Kim; Hyo Jin Jang; Sol Choi; Jae-Hwan Kim; Hans R Schöler; Jeong Tae Do
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 9.261

7.  X-chromosome inactivation and epigenetic fluidity in human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Susana S Silva; Rebecca K Rowntree; Shila Mekhoubad; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-13       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Telomeric RNAs mark sex chromosomes in stem cells.

Authors:  Li-Feng Zhang; Yuya Ogawa; Janice Y Ahn; Satoshi H Namekawa; Susana S Silva; Jeannie T Lee
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Xist deficiency and disorders of X-inactivation in rabbit embryonic stem cells can be rescued by transcription-factor-mediated conversion.

Authors:  Yonghua Jiang; Zhaohui Kou; Tong Wu; Weidong An; Ran Zhou; Hong Wang; Yawei Gao; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 3.272

Review 10.  Changing nuclear landscape and unique PML structures during early epigenetic transitions of human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  John T Butler; Lisa L Hall; Kelly P Smith; Jeanne B Lawrence
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 4.429

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.