BACKGROUND: Cruciferous vegetables are the primary source of isothiocyanates and other glucosinolate derivatives that are known to induce phase II detoxifying enzymes, including glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the independent and combined effects of cruciferous vegetable intake and the GSTP1 Ile(105)Val genetic polymorphism on breast cancer risk. DESIGN: Analyses included 3035 cases and 3037 population controls who were participating in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study and for whom diet and genetic data were complete (87% of cases and 85% of controls). RESULTS: With the use of multivariate logistic regression, the GSTP1 Val/Val genotype was significantly associated with greater breast cancer risk (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.99). The association was significantly greater in premenopausal women (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.43) than in postmenopausal women (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.92). Total cruciferous vegetable intake was not significantly associated with breast cancer risk, although subjects reporting greater turnip (P for trend < 0.001) and Chinese cabbage (P for trend = 0.049) intakes had a significantly lower postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Women with the GSTP1 Val/Val genotype and low cruciferous vegetable intake had a breast cancer risk 1.74-fold (95% CI: 1.13, 2.67) that of women with the Ile/Ile or Ile/Val genotype. This effect of low cruciferous vegetable intake and the Val/Val genotype was seen predominantly among premenopausal women (OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.20, 3.59). CONCLUSIONS: Cruciferous vegetable intake consistent with high isothiocyanate exposure may reduce breast cancer risk. Cruciferous vegetable intake also may ameliorate the effects of the GSTP1 genotype.
BACKGROUND: Cruciferous vegetables are the primary source of isothiocyanates and other glucosinolate derivatives that are known to induce phase II detoxifying enzymes, including glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). OBJECTIVE: We investigated the independent and combined effects of cruciferous vegetable intake and the GSTP1Ile(105)Val genetic polymorphism on breast cancer risk. DESIGN: Analyses included 3035 cases and 3037 population controls who were participating in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study and for whom diet and genetic data were complete (87% of cases and 85% of controls). RESULTS: With the use of multivariate logistic regression, the GSTP1 Val/Val genotype was significantly associated with greater breast cancer risk (OR = 1.50; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.99). The association was significantly greater in premenopausal women (OR = 1.69; 95% CI: 1.17, 2.43) than in postmenopausal women (OR = 1.20; 95% CI: 0.74, 1.92). Total cruciferous vegetable intake was not significantly associated with breast cancer risk, although subjects reporting greater turnip (P for trend < 0.001) and Chinese cabbage (P for trend = 0.049) intakes had a significantly lower postmenopausal breast cancer risk. Women with the GSTP1 Val/Val genotype and low cruciferous vegetable intake had a breast cancer risk 1.74-fold (95% CI: 1.13, 2.67) that of women with the Ile/Ile or Ile/Val genotype. This effect of low cruciferous vegetable intake and the Val/Val genotype was seen predominantly among premenopausal women (OR = 2.08; 95% CI = 1.20, 3.59). CONCLUSIONS: Cruciferous vegetable intake consistent with high isothiocyanate exposure may reduce breast cancer risk. Cruciferous vegetable intake also may ameliorate the effects of the GSTP1 genotype.
Authors: Varvara I Minina; Olga A Soboleva; Andrey N Glushkov; Elena N Voronina; Ekaterina A Sokolova; Marina L Bakanova; Yana A Savchenko; Anastasia V Ryzhkova; Ruslan A Titov; Vladimir G Druzhinin; Maxim Yu Sinitsky; Maxim A Asanov Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-08-02 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Stephanie M Tortorella; Simon G Royce; Paul V Licciardi; Tom C Karagiannis Journal: Antioxid Redox Signal Date: 2014-12-19 Impact factor: 8.401
Authors: Rick J Jansen; Dennis P Robinson; Rachael Z Stolzenberg-Solomon; William R Bamlet; XiangLin Tan; Julie M Cunningham; Ying Li; David N Rider; Ann L Oberg; Kari G Rabe; Kristin E Anderson; Rashmi Sinha; Gloria M Petersen Journal: Pancreas Date: 2013-10 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: Emily Vogtmann; Gong Yang; Hong-Lan Li; Jing Wang; Li-Hua Han; Qi-Jun Wu; Li Xie; Quiyin Cai; Guo-Liang Li; John W Waterbor; Emily B Levitan; Bin Zhang; Yu-Tang Gao; Wei Zheng; Yong-Bing Xiang; Xiao-Ou Shu Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-08-07 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Maria G Kakkoura; Maria A Loizidou; Christiana A Demetriou; Giorgos Loucaides; Maria Daniel; Kyriacos Kyriacou; Andreas Hadjisavvas Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2015-11-16 Impact factor: 5.614