Literature DB >> 18316817

Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.

Kirsten Crossgrove1, Kristen L Curran.   

Abstract

Student response systems (clickers) are viewed positively by students and instructors in numerous studies. Evidence that clickers enhance student learning is more variable. After becoming comfortable with the technology during fall 2005-spring 2006, we compared student opinion and student achievement in two different courses taught with clickers in fall 2006. One course was an introductory biology class for nonmajors, and the other course was a 200 level genetics class for biology majors. Students in both courses had positive opinions of the clickers, although we observed some interesting differences between the two groups of students. Student performance was significantly higher on exam questions covering material taught with clickers, although the differences were more dramatic for the nonmajors biology course than the genetics course. We also compared retention of information 4 mo after the course ended, and we saw increased retention of material taught with clickers for the nonmajors course, but not for the genetics course. We discuss the implications of our results in light of differences in how the two courses were taught and differences between science majors and nonmajors.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18316817      PMCID: PMC2262112          DOI: 10.1187/cbe.07-08-0060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ        ISSN: 1931-7913            Impact factor:   3.325


  12 in total

1.  Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes.

Authors:  S P Rao; S E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.288

2.  Formative assessment in physiology teaching using a wireless classroom communication system.

Authors:  Cynthia B Paschal
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing.

Authors:  Ronald N Cortright; Heidi L Collins; David W Rodenbaugh; Stephen E DiCarlo
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.288

Review 4.  Just-in-Time Teaching in biology: creating an active learner classroom using the Internet.

Authors:  Kathleen A Marrs; Gregor Novak
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2004

5.  Approaches to biology teaching and learning: understanding the wrong answers--teaching toward conceptual change.

Authors:  Kimberly Tanner; Deborah Allen
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

6.  Teaching more by lecturing less.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; William B Wood
Journal:  Cell Biol Educ       Date:  2005

Review 7.  Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips.

Authors:  Jane E Caldwell
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

Review 8.  Clicker evolution: seeking intelligent design.

Authors:  Maryfran Barber; David Njus
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Scott Freeman; Eileen O'Connor; John W Parks; Matthew Cunningham; David Hurley; David Haak; Clarissa Dirks; Mary Pat Wenderoth
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Evaluating the impact of a classroom response system in a microbiology course.

Authors:  Erica Suchman; Kay Uchiyama; Ralph Smith; Kim Bender
Journal:  Microbiol Educ       Date:  2006-05
View more
  22 in total

1.  Evaluation of interactive teaching for undergraduate medical students using a classroom interactive response system in India.

Authors:  Rakesh Datta; Karuna Datta; M D Venkatesh
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2015-06-19

2.  Presenting Clicker Questions with an Open- Versus Closed-Response Format.

Authors:  Ginger R Fisher; Sue Ellen DeChenne
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2015-12-01

3.  Teaching creativity and inventive problem solving in science.

Authors:  Robert L DeHaan
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Replacing lecture with peer-led workshops improves student learning.

Authors:  Ralph W Preszler
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Long-term retention of knowledge and critical thinking skills in developmental biology.

Authors:  Diane C Darland; Jeffrey S Carmichael
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2012-12-03

6.  How organic chemistry became one of UCLA's most popular classes.

Authors:  Neil K Garg
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Different but equal? How nonmajors and majors approach and learn genetics.

Authors:  Jennifer K Knight; Michelle K Smith
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Does displaying the class results affect student discussion during peer instruction?

Authors:  Kathryn E Perez; Eric A Strauss; Nicholas Downey; Anne Galbraith; Robert Jeanne; Scott Cooper
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Using peer discussion facilitated by clicker questions in an informal education setting: enhancing farmer learning of science.

Authors:  Michelle K Smith; Seanna L Annis; Jennifer J Kaplan; Frank Drummond
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Classroom Activities: Simple Strategies to Incorporate Student-Centered Activities within Undergraduate Science Lectures.

Authors:  Barbara Lom
Journal:  J Undergrad Neurosci Educ       Date:  2012-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.