Literature DB >> 12928319

Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing.

Ronald N Cortright1, Heidi L Collins, David W Rodenbaugh, Stephen E DiCarlo.   

Abstract

We recently reported that collaborative testing (i.e., group test taking) increased student performance on quizzes. It is unknown, however, whether collaborative testing improves student retention of course content. Therefore, this study was designed to test the hypotheses that collaborative-group testing improves student retention of course content. To test this hypothesis, our undergraduate exercise physiology class of 38 students was randomly divided into two groups: group A (n = 19) and group B (n = 19). During exam 1, students from both groups answered questions in the traditional format as individuals. Immediately after completing the exam as individuals, students from group A answered a randomly selected subset of questions from exam 1 in groups of two (1 group had 3 students) to test the effectiveness of collaborative-group testing on test performance and level of student retention. On the next exam (exam 2, 4 wk later), students from both groups answered questions in the traditional format as individuals and responded to the same subset of questions from exam 1. The subset of questions was analyzed to determine the level of retention of the original test material. In addition, immediately after completing the exam as individuals, students from group B answered a randomly selected subset of questions from exam 2 in groups of two (1 group had 3 students). Finally, on the next exam (exam 3, 4 wk later), students from both groups answered questions in the traditional format as individuals and responded to the same subset of questions from exam 2. This protocol followed a randomized crossover design to control for time and order effects. Student retention of course content was reduced when students completed the original examinations individually. In sharp contrast, student retention was improved (P < 0.05) when students completed the original examinations in groups. Results suggest that collaborative testing is an effective strategy to enhance learning and increase student retention of course content.

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12928319     DOI: 10.1152/advan.00041.2002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ        ISSN: 1043-4046            Impact factor:   2.288


  16 in total

1.  Student attitudes, satisfaction, and learning in a collaborative testing environment.

Authors:  Christopher A Meseke; Rita Nafziger; Jamie K Meseke
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2010

2.  Effect of Collaborative vs. Noncollaborative Quizzes on Examination Scores in a Pharmaceutical Calculations Course.

Authors:  Stephanie Enz; Donald R Frosch
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Comparing the Impact of Course-Based and Apprentice-Based Research Experiences in a Life Science Laboratory Curriculum.

Authors:  Casey Shapiro; Jordan Moberg-Parker; Shannon Toma; Carlos Ayon; Hilary Zimmerman; Elizabeth A Roth-Johnson; Stephen P Hancock; Marc Levis-Fitzgerald; Erin R Sanders
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2015-12-01

4.  Prescribed active learning increases performance in introductory biology.

Authors:  Scott Freeman; Eileen O'Connor; John W Parks; Matthew Cunningham; David Hurley; David Haak; Clarissa Dirks; Mary Pat Wenderoth
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Using clickers in nonmajors- and majors-level biology courses: student opinion, learning, and long-term retention of course material.

Authors:  Kirsten Crossgrove; Kristen L Curran
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  A case-based, problem-based learning approach to prepare master of public health candidates for the complexities of global health.

Authors:  Juan S Leon; Kate Winskell; Deborah A McFarland; Carlos del Rio
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Evaluation of a Flipped Examination Model Implemented in a Final-Year Undergraduate Pharmacotherapeutics Course.

Authors:  Maya Saba; Iriny Metry; Cherie Lucas; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Students' Opinions on Summative Team Assessments in a Three-Year Concentrated Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Frederick R Tejada; Dana R Fasanella; Marwa Elfadaly
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  Small-group learning in an upper-level university biology class enhances academic performance and student attitudes toward group work.

Authors:  Andrew D Gaudet; Leanne M Ramer; Joanne Nakonechny; Jacquelyn J Cragg; Matt S Ramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Collaborative testing improves performance but not content retention in a large-enrollment introductory biology class.

Authors:  Hayley Leight; Cheston Saunders; Robin Calkins; Michelle Withers
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.