Literature DB >> 35342868

Cochran's Q Test of Stimulus Overselectivity within the Verbal Repertoire of Children with Autism.

Lee Mason1,2, Maria Otero1,3, Alonzo Andrews4,5.   

Abstract

Stimulus overselectivity remains an ill-defined concept within behavior analysis, because it can be difficult to distinguish truly restrictive stimulus control from random variation. Quantitative models of bias are useful, though perhaps limited in application. Over the last 50 years, research on stimulus overselectivity has developed a pattern of assessment and intervention repeatedly marred by methodological flaws. Here we argue that a molecular view of overselectivity, under which restricted stimulus control has heretofore been examined, is fundamentally insufficient for analyzing this phenomenon. Instead, we propose the use of the term "overselectivity" to define temporally extended patterns of restrictive stimulus control that have resulted in disproportionate populations of responding that cannot be attributed to chance alone, and highlight examples of overselectivity within the verbal behavior of children with autism spectrum disorder. Viewed as such, stimulus overselectivity lends itself to direct observation and measurement through the statistical analysis of single-subject data. In particular, we demonstrate the use of the Cochran Q test as a means of precisely quantifying stimulus overselectivity. We provide a tutorial on calculation, a model for interpretation, and a discussion of the implications for the use of Cochran's Q by clinicians and researchers. © Association for Behavior Analysis International 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autism spectrum disorder; Cochran’s Q; Restricted stimulus control; Stimulus overselectivity

Year:  2021        PMID: 35342868      PMCID: PMC8894513          DOI: 10.1007/s40614-021-00315-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci        ISSN: 2520-8969


  28 in total

1.  Mendelian controversies: a botanical and historical review.

Authors:  D J Fairbanks; B Rytting
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.844

2.  Misunderstandings about Q and 'Cochran's Q test' in meta-analysis.

Authors:  David C Hoaglin
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Statistical inference for individual organism research: mixed blessing or curse?

Authors:  J Michael
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1974

4.  Discrimination and generalization.

Authors:  T Stokes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  An alternative measure of effect size for Cochran's Q test for related proportions.

Authors:  Kenneth J Berry; Janis E Johnston; Paul W Mielke
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2007-06

Review 6.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

7.  The Functional Independence of Mands and Tacts: Has It Been Demonstrated Empirically?

Authors:  Jonas Gamba; Celso Goyos; Anna Ingeborg Petursdottir
Journal:  Anal Verbal Behav       Date:  2014-12-17

8.  A methodology for assessing the functions of emerging speech in children with developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Dorothea C Lerman; Mandy Parten; Laura R Addison; Christina M Vorndran; Valerie M Volkert; Tiffany Kodak
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

9.  The Verbal Behavior Stimulus Control Ratio Equation: a Quantification of Language.

Authors:  L L Mason; Alonzo Andrews
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03-26

10.  Stimulus Overselectivity in Autism, Down Syndrome, and Typical Development.

Authors:  William V Dube; Rachel S Farber; Marlana R Mueller; Eileen Grant; Lucy Lorin; Curtis K Deutsch
Journal:  Am J Intellect Dev Disabil       Date:  2016-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.