Literature DB >> 17089593

Divided attention performance and the matching law.

Timothy A Shahan1, Christopher A Podlesnik.   

Abstract

This experiment examined the applicability of the generalized matching law to changes in divided-attention performance produced by variations in relative reinforcement rate. Pigeons were exposed to a delayed matching-to-sample procedure in which compound samples (color + line orientation) and element comparisons (two colors or two line orientations) were used. The relative rate of reinforcement for accurate matches on the two types of comparison trials was varied. Variations in relative accuracy with changes in relative reinforcement were well described by the generalized matching law. We suggest that the bias and sensitivity parameters of the generalized matching law may measure the contributions of sensory activation and stimulus pertinence, respectively, to divided-attention performance. Additional work using similar analyses might contribute to a more general quantitative account of how differential consequences contribute to decision processes involved in the allocation of attention.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17089593     DOI: 10.3758/bf03192881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  18 in total

Review 1.  Selective and divided attention in animals.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2005-04-29       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Stimuli, reinforcers, and behavior: an integration.

Authors:  M Davison; J Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Information-processing by pigeons.

Authors:  W S Maki; T C Leuin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-05-05       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Primate analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the prefrontal cortex in the marmoset.

Authors:  R Dias; T W Robbins; A C Roberts
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 6.  What's elementary about associative learning?

Authors:  E A Wasserman; R R Miller
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 24.137

7.  Shared attention in pigeons.

Authors:  W S Maki; C R Leith
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Attention shifts in a maintained discrimination.

Authors:  D S Blough
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Changeover delay and concurrent schedules: some effects on relative performance measures.

Authors:  R L Shull; S S Pliskoff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1967-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Resistance to change and relapse of observing.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Divided attention and the matching law: sample duration affects sensitivity to reinforcement allocation.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 3.  Quantitative analyses of observing and attending.

Authors:  Timothy A Shahan; Christopher A Podlesnik
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-01-31       Impact factor: 1.777

4.  Unraveling sources of stimulus control in a temporal discrimination task.

Authors:  Carlos Pinto; Armando Machado
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.986

5.  Divided stimulus control: a replication and a quantitative model.

Authors:  Michael Davison; Douglas Elliffe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Relative reinforcer rates determine pigeons' attention allocation when separately trained stimuli are presented together.

Authors:  Stephanie Gomes-Ng; Douglas Elliffe; Sarah Cowie
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

7.  Differential reinforcement and resistance to change of divided-attention performance.

Authors:  Christopher A Podlesnik; Eric Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Toward a Quantification of Anhedonia: Unified Matching Law and Signal Detection for Clinical Assessment and Drug Development.

Authors:  Oanh T Luc; Diego A Pizzagalli; Brian D Kangas
Journal:  Perspect Behav Sci       Date:  2021-05-19

9.  Introducing a Method for Calculating the Allocation of Attention in a Cognitive "Two-Armed Bandit" Procedure: Probability Matching Gives Way to Maximizing.

Authors:  Gene M Heyman; Katherine A Grisanzio; Victor Liang
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-03-08
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.