Literature DB >> 18295297

The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics.

Matthew H Phillips1, Jay A Edelman.   

Abstract

We sought to understand the basis of performance variability and perceptual learning in saccadic visual search. Four subjects searched for a target based on its shape in a linear array of densely packed, regularly spaced items, a configuration used to simplify the analysis of performance and to minimize search strategy variability. We measured the dependence of performance-search speed-on the oculomotor variables of fixation duration and saccade amplitude, both within and across experimental sessions. We also measured perceptual span, the area in visual space in which subjects could identify the target above chance, with a modified version of the task using a gaze-contingent display with transiently appearing targets. The principal finding of this study was that both within and across sessions, saccade metrics accounted for much more of the variability and improvement in performance than did fixation duration. Increases in search speed were due primarily to subjects processing information from a greater area of the visual field, rather than processing information from a fixed area more quickly, though there was a small but consistent decrease in fixation duration across sessions. The increase in performance derived from an increase in perceptual span and not merely from an increase in subjects' efficiency in 'tiling' the search array with regions of visibility.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18295297      PMCID: PMC2740615          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.12.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  34 in total

1.  Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search.

Authors:  R Näsänen; H Ojanpää; I Kojo
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Dynamic allocation of visual attention during the execution of sequences of saccades.

Authors:  Timothy M Gersch; Eileen Kowler; Barbara Dosher
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Learning to tell apples from oranges.

Authors:  Manfred Fahle
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The Slow Time-Course of Visual Attention

Authors: 
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Visual lobe dimensions and search performance for targets on a competing homogeneous background.

Authors:  A J Courtney; H S Chan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-07

8.  Spatial and/or temporal adjustments of scanning behavior to visibility changes.

Authors:  A M Jacobs; J K O'Regan
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1987-07

9.  Separation of low-level and high-level factors in complex tasks: visual search.

Authors:  W S Geisler; K L Chou
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  J E Hoffman; B Subramaniam
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08
View more
  8 in total

1.  Looking versus seeing: Strategies alter eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Marcus R Watson; Allison A Brennan; Alan Kingstone; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  The dependence of visual scanning performance on search direction and difficulty.

Authors:  Matthew H Phillips; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Directional processing within the perceptual span during visual target localization.

Authors:  Harold H Greene; Alexander Pollatsek; Kathleen Masserang; Yen Ju Lee; Keith Rayner
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.

Authors:  Mark Mills; Andrew Hollingworth; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Lesa Hoffman; Michael D Dodd
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Training top-down attention improves performance on a triple-conjunction search task.

Authors:  Farhan Baluch; Farhan Baluchg; Laurent Itti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Behavioral performance and visual strategies during skill acquisition using a novel tool use motor learning task.

Authors:  T J Bosch; T Hanna; K A Fercho; L A Baugh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Individuals with dyslexia use a different visual sampling strategy to read text.

Authors:  Léon Franzen; Zoey Stark; Aaron P Johnson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  The Influence of Articulatory Suppression on Reading Among Chinese Children With Developmental Dyslexia: An Eye-Movement Study.

Authors:  Xiuhong Li; Weidong Li; Buyun Liu; Jinxin Zhang; Jingwen Ma; Chuanbo Xie; Jing Wu; Jin Jing
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 3.418

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.