Literature DB >> 18640144

The dependence of visual scanning performance on search direction and difficulty.

Matthew H Phillips1, Jay A Edelman.   

Abstract

Phillips and Edelman [Phillips, M. H., & Edelman, J. A. (2008). The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics. Vision Research, 48(7), 926-936] presented evidence that performance variability in a visual scanning task depends on oculomotor variables related to saccade amplitude rather than fixation duration, and that saccade-related metrics reflects perceptual span. Here, we extend these results by showing that even for extremely difficult searches trial-to-trial performance variability still depends on saccade-related metrics and not fixation duration. We also show that scanning speed is faster for horizontal than for vertical searches, and that these differences derive again from differences in saccade-based metrics and not from differences in fixation duration. We find perceptual span to be larger for horizontal than vertical searches, and approximately symmetric about the line of gaze.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18640144      PMCID: PMC2712349          DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  24 in total

1.  The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics.

Authors:  Matthew H Phillips; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The guidance of eye movements during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research.

Authors:  K Rayner
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Attentional resolution and the locus of visual awareness.

Authors:  S He; P Cavanagh; J Intriligator
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  The zone of focal attention during active visual search.

Authors:  B C Motter; E J Belky
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Saccade target selection and object recognition: evidence for a common attentional mechanism.

Authors:  H Deubel; W X Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 7.  Eye movements and reading.

Authors:  J K O'Regan
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1990

Review 8.  Comparison of perception in the moving and stationary eye.

Authors:  G Sperling
Journal:  Rev Oculomot Res       Date:  1990

9.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades.

Authors:  E Kowler; E Anderson; B Dosher; E Blaser
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Subcortical modulation of attention counters change blindness.

Authors:  James Cavanaugh; Robert H Wurtz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 6.709

View more
  3 in total

1.  Looking versus seeing: Strategies alter eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Marcus R Watson; Allison A Brennan; Alan Kingstone; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

2.  Length perception of horizontal and vertical bisected lines.

Authors:  Pom Charras; Juan Lupiáñez
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-05-19

3.  Investigation of viewing procedures for interpretation of breast tomosynthesis image volumes: a detection-task study with eye tracking.

Authors:  Pontus Timberg; Kristina Lång; Marcus Nyström; Kenneth Holmqvist; Philippe Wagner; Daniel Förnvik; Anders Tingberg; Sophia Zackrisson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-10-20       Impact factor: 5.315

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.