Literature DB >> 11369045

Effect of stimulus contrast on performance and eye movements in visual search.

R Näsänen1, H Ojanpää, I Kojo.   

Abstract

According to the visual span control hypothesis, eye movements are controlled in relation to the size of visual span. In reading, the decrease of contrast reduces visual span, saccade sizes, and reading speed. The purpose of the present study is to determine how stimulus contrast affects the speed of two-dimensional visual search and how changes in eye movements and visual span could explain changes in performance. The task of the observer was to search for, and identify, an uppercase letter from a rectangular array of characters in which the other items were numerals. Threshold search time, i.e. the duration of stimulus presentation required for search that is successful with a given probability, was determined by using a multiple-alternative staircase method. Eye movements were recorded simultaneously by using a video eye tracker. Four different set sizes (the sizes of stimulus array) (3x3-10x10), and five different contrasts (0.0186-0.412) were used. At all set sizes, threshold search time decreased with increasing contrast. Also the average number of fixations per search decreased with increasing contrast. At the smallest set size (3x3), only one fixation was needed except at the lowest contrast. Average fixation duration decreased and saccade amplitudes increased slightly with increasing contrast. The reduction of the number of fixations with increasing contrast suggests that visual span, i.e. the area from which information can be collected at one fixation, increases with increasing contrast. The reduction of the number of fixations together with reduced fixation duration result in reduced search times when contrast increases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11369045     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00056-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Saccadic search performance: the effect of element spacing.

Authors:  Björn N S Vlaskamp; Eelco A B Over; Ignace Th C Hooge
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics.

Authors:  Matthew H Phillips; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Comparing the visual spans for faces and letters.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Jennifer M Scholz; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie; Tingting Liu; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation.

Authors:  A Raninen; S Vanni; L Hyvärinen; R Näsänen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2006-09-04       Impact factor: 10.154

5.  Gaze interaction: anticipation-based control of the gaze of others.

Authors:  Eva Riechelmann; Tim Raettig; Anne Böckler; Lynn Huestegge
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2019-10-25

6.  Determinants of dwell time in visual search: similarity or perceptual difficulty?

Authors:  Stefanie I Becker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  ICAT: a computational model for the adaptive control of fixation durations.

Authors:  Hans A Trukenbrod; Ralf Engbert
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2014-08

8.  Interaction effects of visual stimulus speed and contrast on postural sway.

Authors:  Vivian Holten; Maarten J van der Smagt; Frans A J Verstraten; Stella F Donker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Influences of luminance contrast and ambient lighting on visual context learning and retrieval.

Authors:  Xuelian Zang; Lingyun Huang; Xiuna Zhu; Hermann J Müller; Zhuanghua Shi
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Dorso-Lateral Frontal Cortex of the Ferret Encodes Perceptual Difficulty during Visual Discrimination.

Authors:  Zhe Charles Zhou; Chunxiu Yu; Kristin K Sellers; Flavio Fröhlich
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.