Literature DB >> 20702875

Looking versus seeing: Strategies alter eye movements during visual search.

Marcus R Watson1, Allison A Brennan, Alan Kingstone, James T Enns.   

Abstract

Visual search can be made more efficient by adopting a passive cognitive strategy (i.e., letting the target "pop" into mind) rather than by trying to actively guide attention. In the present study, we examined how this strategic benefit is linked to eye movements. Results show that participants using a passive strategy wait longer before beginning to move their eyes and make fewer saccades than do active participants. Moreover, the passive advantage stems from more efficient use of the information in a fixation, rather than from a wider attentional window. Individual difference analyses indicate that strategies also change the way eye movements are related to search success, with a rapid saccade rate predicting success among active participants, and fewer and larger amplitude saccades predicting success among passive participants. A change in mindset, therefore, alters how oculomotor behaviors are harnessed in the service of visual search.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702875     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Attention is fast but volition is slow.

Authors:  J M Wolfe; G A Alvarez; T S Horowitz
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-17       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Search performance without eye movements.

Authors:  R Klein; M Farrell
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1989-11

3.  Optimal eye movement strategies in visual search.

Authors:  Jiri Najemnik; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-03-17       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics.

Authors:  Matthew H Phillips; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Training older adults to search more effectively: scanning strategy and visual search in dynamic displays.

Authors:  Ensar Becic; Walter R Boot; Arthur F Kramer
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2008-06

6.  Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.

Authors:  G J Zelinsky; D L Sheinberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Studies of Visual Inspection.

Authors:  J W Schoonahd; J D Gould; L A Miller
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.778

8.  Eye-movement control in visual search: how direct is visual span control?

Authors:  A M Jacobs
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1986-01

9.  Simple summation rule for optimal fixation selection in visual search.

Authors:  Jiri Najemnik; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Revisiting the category effect: the influence of meaning and search strategy on the efficiency of visual search.

Authors:  Daniel Smilek; Mike J Dixon; Philip M Merikle
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  12 in total

1.  Efficient "pop-out" visual search elicits sustained broadband γ activity in the dorsal attention network.

Authors:  Tomas Ossandón; Juan R Vidal; Carolina Ciumas; Karim Jerbi; Carlos M Hamamé; Sarang S Dalal; Olivier Bertrand; Lorella Minotti; Philippe Kahane; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The effects of circadian phase, time awake, and imposed sleep restriction on performing complex visual tasks: evidence from comparative visual search.

Authors:  Marc Pomplun; Edward J Silva; Joseph M Ronda; Sean W Cain; Mirjam Y Münch; Charles A Czeisler; Jeanne F Duffy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Human visual search behaviour is far from ideal.

Authors:  Anna Nowakowska; Alasdair D F Clarke; Amelia R Hunt
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-02-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The downside of choice: Having a choice benefits enjoyment, but at a cost to efficiency and time in visual search.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Surani Ariyabandu; Zaffran Jami
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Directionality in Aesthetic Judgments and Performance Evaluation: Sport Judges and Laypeople Compared.

Authors:  Florian Loffing; Stefanie Nickel; Norbert Hagemann
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-12-05

6.  It is not good to talk: conversation has a fixed interference cost on attention regardless of difficulty.

Authors:  Melina A Kunar; Louise Cole; Angeline Cox; Jessica Ocampo
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2018-08-22

7.  Acute Sleep Restriction Has Differential Effects on Components of Attention.

Authors:  Jasmyn E A Cunningham; Stephanie A H Jones; Gail A Eskes; Benjamin Rusak
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.157

8.  Why do we move our head to look at an object in our peripheral region? Lateral viewing interferes with attentive search.

Authors:  Ryoichi Nakashima; Satoshi Shioiri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Cognitive Strategies and Natural Environments Interact in Influencing Executive Function.

Authors:  Stefan C Bourrier; Marc G Berman; James T Enns
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-07-23

10.  Examining the effects of passive and active strategies on behavior during hybrid visual memory search: evidence from eye tracking.

Authors:  Jessica Madrid; Michael C Hout
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2019-09-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.