Literature DB >> 9090154

Eye movements during parallel-serial visual search.

G J Zelinsky1, D L Sheinberg.   

Abstract

Two experiments (one using O and Q-like stimuli and the other using colored-oriented bars) investigated the oculomotor behavior accompanying parallel-serial visual search. Eye movements were recorded as participants searched for a target in 5- or 17-item displays. Results indicated the presence of parallel-serial search dichotomies and 2:1 ratios of negative to positive slopes in the number of saccades initiated during both search tasks. This saccade number measure also correlated highly with search times, accounting for up to 67% of the reaction time (RT) variability. Weak correlations between fixation durations and RTs suggest that this oculomotor measure may be related more to stimulus factors than to search processes. A third experiment compared free-eye and fixed-eye searches and found a small RT advantage when eye movements were prevented. Together these findings suggest that parallel-serial search dichotomies are reflected in oculomotor behavior.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9090154     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.23.1.244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  44 in total

1.  The timing of sequences of saccades in visual search.

Authors:  E M Van Loon; I Th C Hooge; A V Van den Berg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging.

Authors:  P M Greenwood; Raja Parasuraman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2004-01

3.  Looking versus seeing: Strategies alter eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Marcus R Watson; Allison A Brennan; Alan Kingstone; James T Enns
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-08

Review 4.  Serial vs. parallel models of attention in visual search: accounting for benchmark RT-distributions.

Authors:  Rani Moran; Michael Zehetleitner; Heinrich René Liesefeld; Hermann J Müller; Marius Usher
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

5.  The effect of directional compatibility on the response latencies of ocular and manual movements.

Authors:  E Niechwiej-Szwedo; W E McIlroy; R Green; M C Verrier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eye movements and time-based selection: where do the eyes go in preview search?

Authors:  Derrick G Watson; Matthew Inglis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-10

7.  The dependence of visual scanning performance on saccade, fixation, and perceptual metrics.

Authors:  Matthew H Phillips; Jay A Edelman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 8.  A theory of eye movements during target acquisition.

Authors:  Gregory J Zelinsky
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Why do we miss rare targets? Exploring the boundaries of the low prevalence effect.

Authors:  Anina N Rich; Melina A Kunar; Michael J Van Wert; Barbara Hidalgo-Sotelo; Todd S Horowitz; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-24       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Object-finding skill created by repeated reward experience.

Authors:  Ali Ghazizadeh; Whitney Griggs; Okihide Hikosaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.