Literature DB >> 18284343

When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.

Iria SanMiguel1, María-José Corral, Carles Escera.   

Abstract

The sensitivity of involuntary attention to top-down modulation was tested using an auditory-visual distraction task and a working memory (WM) load manipulation in subjects performing a simple visual classification task while ignoring contingent auditory stimulation. The sounds were repetitive standard tones (80%) and environmental novel sounds (20%). Distraction caused by the novel sounds was compared across a 1-back WM condition and a no-memory control condition, both involving the comparison of two digits. Event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to the sounds were recorded, and the N1/MMN (mismatch negativity), novelty-P3, and RON components were identified in the novel minus standard difference waveforms. Distraction was reduced in the WM condition, both behaviorally and as indexed by an attenuation of the late phase of the novelty-P3. The transient/change detection mechanism indexed by MMN was not affected by the WM manipulation. Sustained slow frontal and parietal waveforms related to WM processes were found on the standard ERPs. The present results indicate that distraction caused by irrelevant novel sounds is reduced when a WM component is involved in the task, and that this modulation by WM load takes place at a late state of the orienting response, all in all confirming that involuntary attention is under the control of top-down mechanisms. Moreover, as these results contradict predictions of the load theory of selective attention and cognitive control, it is suggested that the WM load effects on distraction depend on the nature of the distractor-target relationships.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18284343     DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  55 in total

Review 1.  The cognitive determinants of behavioral distraction by deviant auditory stimuli: a review.

Authors:  Fabrice B R Parmentier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-21

2.  The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study.

Authors:  Jie-Yu Lv; Ting Wang; Jiang Qiu; Si-Hai Feng; Shen Tu; Dong-Tao Wei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Novelty detection is enhanced when attention is otherwise engaged: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  J Schomaker; M Meeter
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Functional fractionation of the stimulus-driven attention network.

Authors:  Suk Won Han; René Marois
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sarah F Poissant; Gabrielle R Merchant
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Biomechanical and neurocognitive performance outcomes of walking with transtibial limb loss while challenged by a concurrent task.

Authors:  Alison L Pruziner; Emma P Shaw; Jeremy C Rietschel; Brad D Hendershot; Matthew W Miller; Erik J Wolf; Bradley D Hatfield; Christopher L Dearth; Rodolphe J Gentili
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Suppression of irrelevant sounds during auditory working memory.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Larry J Seidman; Wei-Tang Chang; Matti Hämäläinen; Samantha Huang
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Habitual short sleep impacts frontal switch mechanism in attention to novelty.

Authors:  Valentina Gumenyuk; Thomas Roth; Oleg Korzyukov; Catherine Jefferson; Susan Bowyer; Christopher L Drake
Journal:  Sleep       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 5.849

9.  A load on my mind: evidence that anhedonic depression is like multi-tasking.

Authors:  Keith Bredemeier; Howard Berenbaum; James R Brockmole; Walter R Boot; Daniel J Simons; Steven B Most
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 10.  When doors of perception close: bottom-up models of disrupted cognition in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Daniel C Javitt
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 18.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.