Literature DB >> 28818692

Suppression of irrelevant sounds during auditory working memory.

Jyrki Ahveninen1, Larry J Seidman2, Wei-Tang Chang3, Matti Hämäläinen4, Samantha Huang3.   

Abstract

Auditory working memory (WM) processing in everyday acoustic environments depends on our ability to maintain relevant information online in our minds, and to suppress interference caused by competing incoming stimuli. A challenge in communication settings is that the relevant content and irrelevant inputs may emanate from a common source, such as a talkative conversationalist. An open question is how the WM system deals with such interference. Will the distracters become inadvertently filtered before processing for meaning because the primary WM operations deplete all available processing resources? Or are they suppressed post perceptually, through an active control process? We tested these alternative hypotheses by measuring magnetoencephalography (MEG), EEG, and functional MRI (fMRI) during a phonetic auditory continuous performance task. Contextual WM maintenance load was manipulated by adjusting the number of "filler" letter sounds in-between cue and target letter sounds. Trial-to-trial variability of pre- and post-stimulus activations in fMRI-informed cortical MEG/EEG estimates was analyzed within and across 14 subjects using generalized linear mixed effect (GLME) models. High contextual WM maintenance load suppressed left auditory cortex (AC) activations around 250-300 ms after the onset of irrelevant phonetic sounds. This effect coincided with increased 10-14 Hz alpha-range oscillatory functional connectivity between the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and left AC. Suppression of AC responses to irrelevant sounds during active maintenance of the task context also correlated with increased pre-stimulus 7-15 Hz alpha power. Our results suggest that under high auditory WM load, irrelevant sounds are suppressed through a "late" active suppression mechanism, which prevents short-term consolidation of irrelevant information without affecting the initial screening of potentially meaningful stimuli. The results also suggest that AC alpha oscillations play an inhibitory role during auditory WM processing.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818692      PMCID: PMC5696107          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  49 in total

1.  Memory traces for words as revealed by the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  F Pulvermüller; T Kujala; Y Shtyrov; J Simola; H Tiitinen; P Alku; K Alho; S Martinkauppi; R J Ilmoniemi; R Näätänen
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Paradox lost? Exploring the role of alpha oscillations during externally vs. internally directed attention and the implications for idling and inhibition hypotheses.

Authors:  Nicholas R Cooper; Rodney J Croft; Samuel J J Dominey; Adrian P Burgess; John H Gruzelier
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.997

Review 3.  Distracted and confused?: selective attention under load.

Authors:  Nilli Lavie
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Delay-period activity in the prefrontal cortex: one function is sensory gating.

Authors:  Bradley R Postle
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Electrical signs of selective attention in the human brain.

Authors:  S A Hillyard; R F Hink; V L Schwent; T W Picton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-10-12       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation.

Authors:  M M Chun; M C Potter
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: gating by inhibition.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Ali Mazaheri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 8.  Human gamma-frequency oscillations associated with attention and memory.

Authors:  Ole Jensen; Jochen Kaiser; Jean-Philippe Lachaux
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 9.  EEG alpha oscillations: the inhibition-timing hypothesis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Klimesch; Paul Sauseng; Simon Hanslmayr
Journal:  Brain Res Rev       Date:  2006-08-01

10.  Association of Neurocognition With Transition to Psychosis: Baseline Functioning in the Second Phase of the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Larry J Seidman; Daniel I Shapiro; William S Stone; Kristen A Woodberry; Ashley Ronzio; Barbara A Cornblatt; Jean Addington; Carrie E Bearden; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Daniel H Mathalon; Thomas H McGlashan; Diana O Perkins; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Scott W Woods
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 21.596

View more
  1 in total

1.  Distinct Regional Oscillatory Connectivity Patterns During Auditory Target and Novelty Processing.

Authors:  Fahimeh Mamashli; Samantha Huang; Sheraz Khan; Matti S Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Jyrki Ahveninen
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 3.020

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.