Literature DB >> 30460393

Biomechanical and neurocognitive performance outcomes of walking with transtibial limb loss while challenged by a concurrent task.

Alison L Pruziner1,2,3, Emma P Shaw4,5,6, Jeremy C Rietschel5,7, Brad D Hendershot8,4,9, Matthew W Miller10, Erik J Wolf8,4,9, Bradley D Hatfield5,6, Christopher L Dearth8,4,9,11, Rodolphe J Gentili5,6,12.   

Abstract

Individuals who have sustained loss of a lower limb may require adaptations in sensorimotor and control systems to effectively utilize a prosthesis, and the interaction of these systems during walking is not clearly understood for this patient population. The aim of this study was to concurrently evaluate temporospatial gait mechanics and cortical dynamics in a population with and without unilateral transtibial limb loss (TT). Utilizing motion capture and electroencephalography, these outcomes were simultaneously collected while participants with and without TT completed a concurrent task of varying difficulty (low- and high-demand) while seated and walking. All participants demonstrated a wider base of support and more stable gait pattern when walking and completing the high-demand concurrent task. The cortical dynamics were similarly modulated by the task demand for both groups, to include a decrease in the novelty-P3 component and increase in the frontal theta/parietal alpha ratio power when completing the high-demand task, although specific differences were also observed. These findings confirm and extend prior efforts indicating that dual-task walking can negatively affect walking mechanics and/or neurocognitive performance. However, there may be limited additional cognitive and/or biomechanical impact of utilizing a prosthesis in a stable, protected environment in TT who have acclimated to ambulating with a prosthesis. These results highlight the need for future work to evaluate interactions between these cognitive-motor control systems for individuals with more proximal levels of lower limb loss, and in more challenging (ecologically valid) environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomechanics; Cognitive workload; Dual-task walking; Electroencephalogram; Limb loss

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30460393     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-018-5419-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  62 in total

1.  Neurophysiological measures of working memory and individual differences in cognitive ability and cognitive style.

Authors:  A Gevins; M E Smith
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 2.  Imaging human EEG dynamics using independent component analysis.

Authors:  Julie Onton; Marissa Westerfield; Jeanne Townsend; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  Control of lateral balance in walking. Experimental findings in normal subjects and above-knee amputees.

Authors:  At L Hof; Renske M van Bockel; Tanneke Schoppen; Klaas Postema
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  Relationships between dual-task related changes in stride velocity and stride time variability in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Véronique Dubost; Reto W Kressig; Régis Gonthier; François R Herrmann; Kamiar Aminian; Bijan Najafi; Olivier Beauchet
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 2.161

5.  Adults with dyslexia: theta power changes during performance of a sequential motor task.

Authors:  Stephen A Coombes; Christopher M Janelle; Aaron R Duley; Timothy Conway
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2004-11-05       Impact factor: 2.997

6.  Frontal midline EEG dynamics during working memory.

Authors:  Julie Onton; Arnaud Delorme; Scott Makeig
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Stride-to-stride variability while backward counting among healthy young adults.

Authors:  Olivier Beauchet; Véronique Dubost; François R Herrmann; Reto W Kressig
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Gait variability: methods, modeling and meaning.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Hausdorff
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-07-20       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Attention demanding tasks during treadmill walking reduce step width variability in young adults.

Authors:  Mark D Grabiner; Karen L Troy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Too much or too little step width variability is associated with a fall history in older persons who walk at or near normal gait speed.

Authors:  Jennifer S Brach; Jaime E Berlin; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Anne B Newman; Stephanie A Studenski
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2005-07-26       Impact factor: 4.262

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Measuring mental workload in assistive wearable devices: a review.

Authors:  Charlotte Marchand; Jozina B De Graaf; Nathanaël Jarrassé
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 4.262

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.