Literature DB >> 18283923

Pictures in mind: initial encoding of object properties varies with the realism of the scene stimulus.

Benjamin W Tatler1, David Melcher.   

Abstract

A fundamental question in perception is how we visually encode and retain information about a complex scene in order to allow effective operation within it. Interestingly, the stimuli used to investigate scene perception have varied greatly between studies, ranging from line drawings to coloured drawings, computer-generated scenes, photographs, and real scenes. Are findings from these different types of scene stimulus equally ecologically valid? Two experiments are reported that address this issue. In the first we compared photographic and non-photographic scenes and found that observers perform better in questions testing object memory when viewing photographs, suggesting an initial benefit for encoding information from photographs. In the second we found that whether or not non-photographic scenes obeyed realistic scene-organising properties influenced object-memory formation. Effects varied for the different question types, but again were most prominent early in viewing. We conclude that in the search for an understanding of everyday scene perception we must be very careful in our choice of scene stimuli and in our interpretation of findings from the laboratory.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18283923     DOI: 10.1068/p5592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  9 in total

Review 1.  Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory.

Authors:  Benjamin W Tatler; Michael F Land
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  The interplay of episodic and semantic memory in guiding repeated search in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-21

3.  Seek and you shall remember: scene semantics interact with visual search to build better memories.

Authors:  Dejan Draschkow; Jeremy M Wolfe; Melissa L H Võ
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  When does repeated search in scenes involve memory? Looking at versus looking for objects in scenes.

Authors:  Melissa L-H Võ; Jeremy M Wolfe
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details.

Authors:  Timothy F Brady; Talia Konkle; George A Alvarez; Aude Oliva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The role of semantic interference in limiting memory for the details of visual scenes.

Authors:  David Melcher; Brian Murphy
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-10-14

7.  BOiS-Berlin Object in Scene Database: Controlled Photographic Images for Visual Search Experiments with Quantified Contextual Priors.

Authors:  Johannes Mohr; Julia Seyfarth; Andreas Lueschow; Joachim E Weber; Felix A Wichmann; Klaus Obermayer
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-23

8.  Where's Wally: the influence of visual salience on referring expression generation.

Authors:  Alasdair D F Clarke; Micha Elsner; Hannah Rohde
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-18

9.  Pupillary response to representations of light in paintings.

Authors:  Serena Castellotti; Martina Conti; Claudia Feitosa-Santana; Maria Michela Del Viva
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.