Literature DB >> 26546074

Review of recent advances in segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Mario Mustra1, Mislav Grgic2, Rangaraj M Rangayyan3.   

Abstract

This paper presents a review of recent advances in the development of methods for segmentation of the breast boundary and the pectoral muscle in mammograms. Regardless of improvement of imaging technology, accurate segmentation of the breast boundary and detection of the pectoral muscle are still challenging tasks for image processing algorithms. In this paper, we discuss problems related to mammographic image preprocessing and accurate segmentation. We review specific methods that were commonly used in most of the techniques proposed for segmentation of mammograms and discuss their advantages and disadvantages. Comparative analysis of the methods reported on is made difficult by variations in the datasets and procedures of evaluation used by the authors. We attempt to overcome some of these limitations by trying to compare methods which used the same dataset and have some similarities in approaches to the breast boundary segmentation and detection of the pectoral muscle. In this paper, we will address the most often used methods for segmentation such as thresholding, morphology, region growing, active contours, and wavelet filtering. These methods, or their combinations, are the ones most used in the last decade by the majority of work published in this image processing domain.

Keywords:  Breast boundary; Mammography; Pectoral muscle; Segmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26546074     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-015-1411-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  22 in total

1.  EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.

Authors:  N Day; S Oakes; R Luben; K T Khaw; S Bingham; A Welch; N Wareham
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 7.640

2.  Identification of the breast boundary in mammograms using active contour models.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Automatic detection of pectoral muscle using average gradient and shape based feature.

Authors:  Jayasree Chakraborty; Sudipta Mukhopadhyay; Veenu Singla; Niranjan Khandelwal; Pinakpani Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Radon-domain detection of the nipple and the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  S K Kinoshita; P M Azevedo-Marques; R R Pereira; J A H Rodrigues; R M Rangayyan
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  A statistical approach for breast density segmentation.

Authors:  Arnau Oliver; Xavier Lladó; Elsa Pérez; Josep Pont; Erika R E Denton; Jordi Freixenet; Joan Martí
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-06-09       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Computer-aided identification of the pectoral muscle in digitized mammograms.

Authors:  K Santle Camilus; V K Govindan; P S Sathidevi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2009-10-09       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  A computational approach to edge detection.

Authors:  J Canny
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 6.226

8.  Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations.

Authors:  J M Lewin; R E Hendrick; C J D'Orsi; P K Isaacs; L J Moss; A Karellas; G A Sisney; C C Kuni; G R Cutter
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Accuracy of segmentation of a commercial computer-aided detection system for mammography.

Authors:  Jay A Baker; Eric L Rosen; Michele M Crockett; Joseph Y Lo
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Automatic identification of the pectoral muscle in mammograms.

Authors:  R J Ferrari; R M Rangayyan; J E L Desautels; R A Borges; A F Frère
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 10.048

View more
  14 in total

1.  Automatic Pectoral Muscle Region Segmentation in Mammograms Using Genetic Algorithm and Morphological Selection.

Authors:  Rongbo Shen; Kezhou Yan; Fen Xiao; Jia Chang; Cheng Jiang; Ke Zhou
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Automated breast tumor detection and segmentation with a novel computational framework of whole ultrasound images.

Authors:  Lei Liu; Kai Li; Wenjian Qin; Tiexiang Wen; Ling Li; Jia Wu; Jia Gu
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  A novel pectoral muscle segmentation from scanned mammograms using EMO algorithm.

Authors:  Santhos Kumar Avuti; Varun Bajaj; Anil Kumar; Girish Kumar Singh
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2019-11-05

4.  Automated modification and fusion of voxel models to construct body phantoms with heterogeneous breast tissue: Application to MRI simulations.

Authors:  Joseph V Rispoli; Steven M Wright; Craig R Malloy; Mary P McDougall
Journal:  J Biomed Graph Comput       Date:  2017-02-26

Review 5.  Chemotherapeutic nanomaterials in tumor boundary delineation: Prospects for effective tumor treatment.

Authors:  Ozioma Udochukwu Akakuru; Zhoujing Zhang; M Zubair Iqbal; Chengjie Zhu; Yewei Zhang; Aiguo Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 14.903

6.  Comparison of Transferred Deep Neural Networks in Ultrasonic Breast Masses Discrimination.

Authors:  Ting Xiao; Lei Liu; Kai Li; Wenjian Qin; Shaode Yu; Zhicheng Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.411

7.  An interval prototype classifier based on a parameterized distance applied to breast thermographic images.

Authors:  Marcus C Araújo; Renata M C R Souza; Rita C F Lima; Telmo M Silva Filho
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Deep-LIBRA: An artificial-intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Omid Haji Maghsoudi; Aimilia Gastounioti; Christopher Scott; Lauren Pantalone; Fang-Fang Wu; Eric A Cohen; Stacey Winham; Emily F Conant; Celine Vachon; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 13.828

9.  Automatic Segmentation of Ultrasound Tomography Image.

Authors:  Shibin Wu; Shaode Yu; Ling Zhuang; Xinhua Wei; Mark Sak; Neb Duric; Jiani Hu; Yaoqin Xie
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-09-10       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Current and Emerging Magnetic Resonance-Based Techniques for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Apekshya Chhetri; Xin Li; Joseph V Rispoli
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.