Literature DB >> 26133615

Parenchymal texture analysis in digital mammography: A fully automated pipeline for breast cancer risk assessment.

Yuanjie Zheng1, Brad M Keller1, Shonket Ray1, Yan Wang1, Emily F Conant1, James C Gee1, Despina Kontos1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mammographic percent density (PD%) is known to be a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Recent studies also suggest that parenchymal texture features, which are more granular descriptors of the parenchymal pattern, can provide additional information about breast cancer risk. To date, most studies have measured mammographic texture within selected regions of interest (ROIs) in the breast, which cannot adequately capture the complexity of the parenchymal pattern throughout the whole breast. To better characterize patterns of the parenchymal tissue, the authors have developed a fully automated software pipeline based on a novel lattice-based strategy to extract a range of parenchymal texture features from the entire breast region.
METHODS: Digital mammograms from 106 cases with 318 age-matched controls were retrospectively analyzed. The lattice-based approach is based on a regular grid virtually overlaid on each mammographic image. Texture features are computed from the intersection (i.e., lattice) points of the grid lines within the breast, using a local window centered at each lattice point. Using this strategy, a range of statistical (gray-level histogram, co-occurrence, and run-length) and structural (edge-enhancing, local binary pattern, and fractal dimension) features are extracted. To cover the entire breast, the size of the local window for feature extraction is set equal to the lattice grid spacing and optimized experimentally by evaluating different windows sizes. The association between their lattice-based texture features and breast cancer was evaluated using logistic regression with leave-one-out cross validation and further compared to that of breast PD% and commonly used single-ROI texture features extracted from the retroareolar or the central breast region. Classification performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC). DeLong's test was used to compare the different ROCs in terms of AUC performance.
RESULTS: The average univariate performance of the lattice-based features is higher when extracted from smaller than larger window sizes. While not every individual texture feature is superior to breast PD% (AUC: 0.59, STD: 0.03), their combination in multivariate analysis has significantly better performance (AUC: 0.85, STD: 0.02, p < 0.001). The lattice-based texture features also outperform the single-ROI texture features when extracted from the retroareolar or the central breast region (AUC: 0.60-0.74, STD: 0.03). Adding breast PD% does not make a significant performance improvement to the lattice-based texture features or the single-ROI features (p > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed lattice-based strategy for mammographic texture analysis enables to characterize the parenchymal pattern over the entire breast. As such, these features provide richer information compared to currently used descriptors and may ultimately improve breast cancer risk assessment. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings and also compare to standard demographic and reproductive risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26133615      PMCID: PMC4474947          DOI: 10.1118/1.4921996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  40 in total

1.  Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Li Lan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.

Authors:  C B Caldwell; S J Stapleton; D W Holdsworth; R A Jong; W J Weiser; G Cooke; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 4.  Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models.

Authors:  Eitan Amir; Orit C Freedman; Bostjan Seruga; D Gareth Evans
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern measure with breast cancer risk: a pilot case-control study.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Heang-Ping Chan; Yi-Ta Wu; Chuan Zhou; Mark A Helvie; Alexander Tsodikov; Lubomir M Hadjiiski; Berkman Sahiner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2011-03-15       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Anna Margolis; Li Lan; Michael R Chinander
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Steven R Cummings; Rebecca Smith-Bindman; Laura Ichikawa; William E Barlow; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Texture features from mammographic images and risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Armando Manduca; Michael J Carston; John J Heine; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Kathy R Brandt; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon; James R Cerhan
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods.

Authors:  Amanda Eng; Zoe Gallant; John Shepherd; Valerie McCormack; Jingmei Li; Mitch Dowsett; Sarah Vinnicombe; Steve Allen; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jingmei Li; Laszlo Szekely; Louise Eriksson; Boel Heddson; Ann Sundbom; Kamila Czene; Per Hall; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  25 in total

1.  Quantitative assessment of microcalcification cluster image quality in digital breast tomosynthesis, 2-dimensional and synthetic mammography.

Authors:  Andreas E Petropoulos; Spyros G Skiadopoulos; Anna N Karahaliou; Gerasimos A T Messaris; Nikolaos S Arikidis; Lena I Costaridou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2019-12-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Association between Breast Parenchymal Complexity and False-Positive Recall From Digital Mammography Versus Breast Tomosynthesis: Preliminary Investigation in the ACRIN PA 4006 Trial.

Authors:  Shonket Ray; Lin Chen; Brad M Keller; Jinbo Chen; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Generalized breast density metrics.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Autumn Smallwood; Cassandra Miltich; Jennifer Drukteinis; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Spatial Correlation and Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Erin E E Fowler; Cassandra Hathaway; Fabryann Tillman; Robert Weinfurtner; Thomas A Sellers; John Heine
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2019-05-22

5.  Breast parenchymal patterns in processed versus raw digital mammograms: A large population study toward assessing differences in quantitative measures across image representations.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Brad M Keller; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Using Convolutional Neural Networks for Enhanced Capture of Breast Parenchymal Complexity Patterns Associated with Breast Cancer Risk.

Authors:  Aimilia Gastounioti; Andrew Oustimov; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Lauren Pantalone; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.173

7.  The Cancer Imaging Phenomics Toolkit (CaPTk): Technical Overview.

Authors:  Sarthak Pati; Ashish Singh; Saima Rathore; Aimilia Gastounioti; Mark Bergman; Phuc Ngo; Sung Min Ha; Dimitrios Bounias; James Minock; Grayson Murphy; Hongming Li; Amit Bhattarai; Adam Wolf; Patmaa Sridaran; Ratheesh Kalarot; Hamed Akbari; Aristeidis Sotiras; Siddhesh P Thakur; Ragini Verma; Russell T Shinohara; Paul Yushkevich; Yong Fan; Despina Kontos; Christos Davatzikos; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Brainlesion       Date:  2020-05-19

8.  Clinicopathologic breast cancer characteristics: predictions using global textural features of the ipsilateral breast mammogram.

Authors:  Ibrahem H Kanbayti; William I D Rae; Mark F McEntee; Ziba Gandomkar; Ernest U Ekpo
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2021-06-02

9.  Radiomic Phenotypes of Mammographic Parenchymal Complexity: Toward Augmenting Breast Density in Breast Cancer Risk Assessment.

Authors:  Despina Kontos; Stacey J Winham; Andrew Oustimov; Lauren Pantalone; Meng-Kang Hsieh; Aimilia Gastounioti; Dana H Whaley; Carrie B Hruska; Karla Kerlikowske; Kathleen Brandt; Emily F Conant; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Cancer imaging phenomics toolkit: quantitative imaging analytics for precision diagnostics and predictive modeling of clinical outcome.

Authors:  Christos Davatzikos; Saima Rathore; Spyridon Bakas; Sarthak Pati; Mark Bergman; Ratheesh Kalarot; Patmaa Sridharan; Aimilia Gastounioti; Nariman Jahani; Eric Cohen; Hamed Akbari; Birkan Tunc; Jimit Doshi; Drew Parker; Michael Hsieh; Aristeidis Sotiras; Hongming Li; Yangming Ou; Robert K Doot; Michel Bilello; Yong Fan; Russell T Shinohara; Paul Yushkevich; Ragini Verma; Despina Kontos
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-01-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.