Literature DB >> 24771118

CFS-SMO based classification of breast density using multiple texture models.

Vipul Sharma1, Sukhwinder Singh.   

Abstract

It is highly acknowledged in the medical profession that density of breast tissue is a major cause for the growth of breast cancer. Increased breast density was found to be linked with an increased risk of breast cancer growth, as high density makes it difficult for radiologists to see an abnormality which leads to false negative results. Therefore, there is need for the development of highly efficient techniques for breast tissue classification based on density. This paper presents a hybrid scheme for classification of fatty and dense mammograms using correlation-based feature selection (CFS) and sequential minimal optimization (SMO). In this work, texture analysis is done on a region of interest selected from the mammogram. Various texture models have been used to quantify the texture of parenchymal patterns of breast. To reduce the dimensionality and to identify the features which differentiate between breast tissue densities, CFS is used. Finally, classification is performed using SMO. The performance is evaluated using 322 images of mini-MIAS database. Highest accuracy of 96.46% is obtained for two-class problem (fatty and dense) using proposed approach. Performance of selected features by CFS is also evaluated by Naïve Bayes, Multilayer Perceptron, RBF Network, J48 and kNN classifier. The proposed CFS-SMO method outperforms all other classifiers giving a sensitivity of 100%. This makes it suitable to be taken as a second opinion in classifying breast tissue density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24771118     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-014-1158-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  10 in total

1.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.

Authors:  Z Huo; M L Giger; D E Wolverton; W Zhong; S Cumming; O I Olopade
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location.

Authors:  Hui Li; Maryellen L Giger; Zhimin Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Li Lan; Barbara L Weber; Ioana Bonta
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.

Authors:  Stefano Ciatto; Daniela Bernardi; Massimo Calabrese; Manuela Durando; Maria Adalgisa Gentilini; Giovanna Mariscotti; Francesco Monetti; Enrica Moriconi; Barbara Pesce; Antonella Roselli; Carmen Stevanin; Margherita Tapparelli; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 4.380

4.  A novel breast tissue density classification methodology.

Authors:  A Oliver; J Freixenet; R Martí; J Pont; E Pérez; E R E Denton; R Zwiggelaar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2008-01

5.  Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images.

Authors:  C M Wu; Y C Chen; K S Hsieh
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  A fully automated scheme for mammographic segmentation and classification based on breast density and asymmetry.

Authors:  Stylianos D Tzikopoulos; Michael E Mavroforakis; Harris V Georgiou; Nikos Dimitropoulos; Sergios Theodoridis
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  MammoSys: A content-based image retrieval system using breast density patterns.

Authors:  Júlia E E de Oliveira; Alexei M C Machado; Guillermo C Chavez; Ana Paula B Lopes; Thomas M Deserno; Arnaldo de A Araújo
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  Association between mammographic breast density and breast cancer tumor characteristics.

Authors:  Erin J Aiello; Diana S M Buist; Emily White; Peggy L Porter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  Mammographic breast density as an intermediate phenotype for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Johanna M Rommens; Kelly Vogt; Vivian Lee; John L Hopper; Martin J Yaffe; Andrew D Paterson
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 41.316

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Correlation-based feature selection and classification via regression of segmented chromosomes using geometric features.

Authors:  Tanvi Arora; Renu Dhir
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  A Novel Solution Based on Scale Invariant Feature Transform Descriptors and Deep Learning for the Detection of Suspicious Regions in Mammogram Images.

Authors:  Alessandro Bruno; Edoardo Ardizzone; Salvatore Vitabile; Massimo Midiri
Journal:  J Med Signals Sens       Date:  2020-07-03

3.  The Correlation between Chemical Structures and Antioxidant, Prooxidant, and Antitrypanosomatid Properties of Flavonoids.

Authors:  João Luiz Baldim; Bianca Gonçalves Vasconcelos de Alcântara; Olívia da Silva Domingos; Marisi Gomes Soares; Ivo Santana Caldas; Rômulo Dias Novaes; Tiago Branquinho Oliveira; João Henrique Ghilardi Lago; Daniela Aparecida Chagas-Paula
Journal:  Oxid Med Cell Longev       Date:  2017-07-02       Impact factor: 6.543

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.