Literature DB >> 22003744

Adaptive multi-cluster fuzzy C-means segmentation of breast parenchymal tissue in digital mammography.

Brad Keller1, Diane Nathan, Yan Wang, Yuanjie Zheng, James Gee, Emily Conant, Despina Kontos.   

Abstract

The relative fibroglandular tissue content in the breast, commonly referred to as breast density, has been shown to be the most significant risk factor for breast cancer after age. Currently, the most common approaches to quantify density are based on either semi-automated methods or visual assessment, both of which are highly subjective. This work presents a novel multi-class fuzzy c-means (FCM) algorithm for fully-automated identification and quantification of breast density, optimized for the imaging characteristics of digital mammography. The proposed algorithm involves adaptive FCM clustering based on an optimal number of clusters derived by the tissue properties of the specific mammogram, followed by generation of a final segmentation through cluster agglomeration using linear discriminant analysis. When evaluated on 80 bilateral screening digital mammograms, a strong correlation was observed between algorithm-estimated PD% and radiological ground-truth of r=0.83 (p<0.001) and an average Jaccard spatial similarity coefficient of 0.62. These results show promise for the clinical application of the algorithm in quantifying breast density in a repeatable manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22003744      PMCID: PMC5510350          DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23626-6_69

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  11 in total

1.  Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.

Authors:  Brandi T Nicholson; Alexander P LoRusso; Mark Smolkin; Viktor E Bovbjerg; Gina R Petroni; Jennifer A Harvey
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  Computing mammographic density from a multiple regression model constructed with image-acquisition parameters from a full-field digital mammographic unit.

Authors:  Lee-Jane W Lu; Thomas K Nishino; Tuenchit Khamapirad; James J Grady; Morton H Leonard; Donald G Brunder
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one.

Authors:  Alberto Tagliafico; Giulio Tagliafico; Simona Tosto; Fabio Chiesa; Carlo Martinoli; Lorenzo E Derchi; Massimo Calabrese
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2008-11-17       Impact factor: 4.380

5.  Automated classification of parenchymal patterns in mammograms.

Authors:  N Karssemeijer
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.

Authors:  Katherine E Martin; Mark A Helvie; Chuan Zhou; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Janet E Bailey; Chintana Paramagul; Caroline E Blane; Katherine A Klein; Seema S Sonnad; Heang-Ping Chan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-07-20       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Screening and prevention of breast cancer in primary care.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Tice; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Prim Care       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.907

9.  Breast percent density: estimation on digital mammograms and central tomosynthesis projections.

Authors:  Predrag R Bakic; Ann-Katherine Carton; Despina Kontos; Cuiping Zhang; Andrea B Troxel; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-05-06       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density.

Authors:  Martin J Yaffe
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-06-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Breast Cancer Biomarkers: CALGB 70806 (Alliance) Study Design and Baseline Data.

Authors:  Ogheneruona Apoe; Sin-Ho Jung; Heshan Liu; Drew K Seisler; Jayne Charlamb; Patricia Zekan; Lili X Wang; Gary W Unzeitig; Judy Garber; James Marshall; Marie Wood
Journal:  Am J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2016-07

2.  Integrating mammographic breast density in glandular dose calculation.

Authors:  Moayyad E Suleiman; Patrick C Brennan; Ernest Ekpo; Peter Kench; Mark F McEntee
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Estimation of breast percent density in raw and processed full field digital mammography images via adaptive fuzzy c-means clustering and support vector machine segmentation.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Diane L Nathan; Yan Wang; Yuanjie Zheng; James C Gee; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  The Impact of Acquisition Dose on Quantitative Breast Density Estimation with Digital Mammography: Results from ACRIN PA 4006.

Authors:  Lin Chen; Shonket Ray; Brad M Keller; Said Pertuz; Elizabeth S McDonald; Emily F Conant; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns as an imaging marker of endogenous hormonal exposure: a preliminary study in a high-risk population.

Authors:  Dania Daye; Brad Keller; Emily F Conant; Jinbo Chen; Mitchell D Schnall; Andrew D A Maidment; Despina Kontos
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  A Review on Automatic Mammographic Density and Parenchymal Segmentation.

Authors:  Wenda He; Arne Juette; Erika R E Denton; Arnau Oliver; Robert Martí; Reyer Zwiggelaar
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-06-11

7.  AutoDensity: an automated method to measure mammographic breast density that predicts breast cancer risk and screening outcomes.

Authors:  Carolyn Nickson; Yulia Arzhaeva; Zoe Aitken; Tarek Elgindy; Mitchell Buckley; Min Li; Dallas R English; Anne M Kavanagh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Automatic and fast segmentation of breast region-of-interest (ROI) and density in MRIs.

Authors:  Dinesh Pandey; Xiaoxia Yin; Hua Wang; Min-Ying Su; Jeon-Hor Chen; Jianlin Wu; Yanchun Zhang
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-12-17
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.