Literature DB >> 18259784

The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Thomas Barz1, Markus Melloh, Lukas Staub, Christoph Roeder, Jörn Lange, Franz-Georg Smiszek, Jean-Claude Theis, Harry R Merk.   

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis is a frequent indication for spinal surgery. The predictive quality of treadmill testing and MRI for diagnostic verification is not yet clearly defined. Aim of the current study was to assess correlations between treadmill testing and MRI findings in the lumbar spine. Twenty-five patients with lumbar spinal stenosis were prospectively examined. Treadmill tests were performed and the area of the dural sac and neuroforamina was examined with MRI for the narrowest spinal segment. VAS and ODI were used for clinical assessment. The median age of the patients was 67 years. In the narrowest spinal segment the median area of the dural sac was 91 mm(2). The median ODI was 66 per cent. The median walking distance in the treadmill test was 70 m. The distance reached in the treadmill test correlated with the area of the dural sac (Spearman's rho = 0.53) and ODI (rho = -0.51), but not with the area of the neuroforamina and VAS. The distance reached in the treadmill test predicts the grade of stenosis in MRI but has a limited diagnostic importance for the level of clinical symptoms in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18259784      PMCID: PMC2367408          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-008-0593-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Measurements of the normal lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Segmental study of L3-L4 and L4-L5 related to the height of the subject.

Authors:  P Gouzien; C Cazalbou; B Boyer; P Darodes de Tailly; Y Guenec; B Sénécail
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Pressure changes following constriction of the cauda equina. An experimental study in situ.

Authors:  N Schönström; T Hansson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  N F Bolender; N S Schönström; D M Spengler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 4.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  J N Katz; M Dalgas; G Stucki; S J Lipson
Journal:  Rheum Dis Clin North Am       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 2.670

5.  The pathomorphology of spinal stenosis as seen on CT scans of the lumbar spine.

Authors:  N S Schonstrom; N F Bolender; D M Spengler
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Importance of compression onset rate for the degree of impairment of impulse propagation in experimental compression injury of the porcine cauda equina.

Authors:  K Olmarker; S Holm; B Rydevik
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  [Possible conservative treatment methods for patients with spinal claudication].

Authors:  F Zeifang; R Abel; M Schiltenwolf
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.087

8.  Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis in adults: a metaanalysis of the accuracy of CT, MR, and myelography.

Authors:  D L Kent; D R Haynor; E B Larson; R A Deyo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Intraoperative measurements of nerve root blood flow during discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Authors:  Shinichi Hida; Masatoshi Naito; Masahiro Kubo
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Double-level cauda equina compression: an experimental study with continuous monitoring of intraneural blood flow in the porcine cauda equina.

Authors:  K Takahashi; K Olmarker; S Holm; R W Porter; B Rydevik
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.494

View more
  12 in total

1.  Is the sedimentation sign associated with spinal stenosis surgical treatment effect in SPORT?

Authors:  Rachel A Moses; Wenyan Zhao; Lukas P Staub; Markus Melloh; Thomas Barz; Jon D Lurie
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.

Authors:  Christian Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Harry R Merk; Thomas Barz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The role of MRI in musculoskeletal practice: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Gail Dean Deyle
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2011-08

4.  Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.

Authors:  James Rainville; Lisa A Childs; Enrique B Peña; Pradeep Suri; Janet C Limke; Cristin Jouve; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 4.166

Review 5.  Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Jon Lurie; Christy Tomkins-Lane
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-01-04

6.  Step activity monitoring in lumbar stenosis patients undergoing decompressive surgery.

Authors:  Tobias L Schulte; Tim Schubert; Corinna Winter; Mirko Brandes; Lars Hackenberg; Hansdetlef Wassmann; Dennis Liem; Dieter Rosenbaum; Viola Bullmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annette Bennedsgaard Jespersen; Malin Eleonora Av Kák Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Correlations between sedimentation sign, dural sac cross-sectional area, and clinical symptoms of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Sangbong Ko
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Increased intraoperative epidural pressure in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with a positive nerve root sedimentation sign.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Jörn Lange; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Diagnostic value of the lumbar extension-loading test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Naoto Takahashi; Shin-Ichi Kikuchi; Shoji Yabuki; Koji Otani; Shin-Ichi Konno
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.