Literature DB >> 24166020

Increased intraoperative epidural pressure in lumbar spinal stenosis patients with a positive nerve root sedimentation sign.

Thomas Barz1, Markus Melloh, Lukas P Staub, Sarah J Lord, Jörn Lange, Harry R Merk.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The sedimentation sign (SedSign) has been shown to discriminate well between selected patients with and without lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure values associated with LSS versus non-LSS and discuss whether a positive SedSign may be related to increased epidural pressure at the level of the stenosis.
METHODS: We measured the intraoperative epidural pressure in five patients without LSS and a negative SedSign, and in five patients with LSS and a positive SedSign using a Codman(™) catheter in prone position under radioscopy.
RESULTS: Patients with a negative SedSign had a median epidural pressure of 9 mmHg independent of the measurement location. Breath and pulse-synchronous waves accounted for 1-3 mmHg. In patients with monosegmental LSS and a positive SedSign, the epidural pressure above and below the stenosis was similar (median 8-9 mmHg). At the level of the stenosis the median epidural pressure was 22 mmHg. A breath and pulse-synchronous wave was present cranial to the stenosis, but absent below. These findings were independent of the cross-sectional area of the spinal canal at the level of the stenosis.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with LSS have an increased epidural pressure at the level of the stenosis and altered pressure wave characteristics below. We argue that the absence of sedimentation of lumbar nerve roots to the dorsal part of the dural sac in supine position may be due to tethering of affected nerve roots at the level of the stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24166020     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-013-3071-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Dynamic physiologic changes in lumbar CSF volume quantitatively measured by three-dimensional fast spin-echo MRI.

Authors:  R R Lee; R A Abraham; C B Quinn
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Cerebrospinal fluid pressure measurement in the ovine intrathecal space: a preliminary study towards the diagnosis of intrathecal drug administration catheter dislodgement or occlusion.

Authors:  Robert J Coffey; Keith Miesel; Tina Billstrom
Journal:  Stereotact Funct Neurosurg       Date:  2010-08-21       Impact factor: 1.875

3.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging vs. electrodiagnostic root compromise in lumbar spinal stenosis: a masked controlled study.

Authors:  Anthony Chiodo; Andrew J Haig; Karen S J Yamakawa; Douglas Quint; Henry Tong; Vaishali R Choksi
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.159

5.  Pressure increase in the dorsal root ganglion following mechanical compression. Closed compartment syndrome in nerve roots.

Authors:  B L Rydevik; R R Myers; H C Powell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  [The usefulness of lumbar epidural pressure as an index of intracranial pressure].

Authors:  S Fujioka; M Kaku; J Hamada; A Yokota; Y Ushio
Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.742

7.  Nerve root sedimentation sign: evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Jörn Lange; Christoph P Röder; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Experimental spinal stenosis: relationship between degree of cauda equina compression, neuropathology, and pain.

Authors:  Miho Sekiguchi; Shinichi Kikuchi; Robert R Myers
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Blood flow analysis of compressed nerve root after intravenous injection of lipo-prostaglandin E1.

Authors:  Shigeru Kobayashi; Hisatoshi Baba; Kenichi Takeno; Seiichro Shimada; Masafumi Kubota; Takafumi Yayama; Tsuyoshi Miyazaki; Kenzo Uchida; Yoshihiko Suzuki
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Correlation between disability and MRI findings in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study of 109 patients operated on by decompression.

Authors:  Freyr G Sigmundsson; Xiao P Kang; Bo Jönsson; Björn Strömqvist
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.717

View more
  15 in total

1.  The nerve root sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective, consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Bin Liu; Wei Zhang; Yeqing Zhu; Limin Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign, a radiological sign using magnetic resonance imaging, for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Peigen Xie; Wei Zhang; Yang Yang; Limin Rong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  Diagnostic performance of the nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guangye Wang; Zhan Peng; Jin Li; Zukun Song; Pu Wang
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Reversibility of nerve root sedimentation sign in lumbar spinal stenosis patients after decompression surgery.

Authors:  Christian Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas P Staub; Sarah J Lord; Harry R Merk; Thomas Barz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-04       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A Radiographic Measurement of the Anterior Epidural Space at L4-5 Disc Level.

Authors:  Rui-Sheng Xu; Jie-Shi Wu; Hai-Dan Lu; Hao-Gang Zhu; Xia Li; Jian Dong; Feng-Lai Yuan
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Clinical symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis associated with morphological parameters on magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Young Uk Kim; Yu-Gyeong Kong; Jonghyuk Lee; Yuseon Cheong; Se hun Kim; Hyun Kyu Kim; Jun Young Park; Jeong Hun Suh
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  [Research progress on nerve root sedimentation sign of lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  Zhihao Huang; Zhiyang Xie; Xiaotao Wu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-07-15

8.  Optimal Cut-Off Value of the Superior Articular Process Area as a Morphological Parameter to Predict Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis.

Authors:  Tae-Ha Lim; Soo Il Choi; Hyung Rae Cho; Keum Nae Kang; Chang Joon Rhyu; Eun Young Chae; Young Su Lim; Yongsoo Lee; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2017-01-09       Impact factor: 3.037

9.  Can MRI Findings Help to Predict Neurological Recovery in Paraplegics With Thoracolumbar Fracture?

Authors:  Joonchul Lee; Seong-Eun Koh; Heeyoune Jung; Hye Yeon Lee; In-Sik Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2015-12-29

10.  Dural sac area is a more sensitive parameter for evaluating lumbar spinal stenosis than spinal canal area: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Young Su Lim; Jong-Uk Mun; Mi Sook Seo; Bo-Hyun Sang; Yun-Sic Bang; Keum Nae Kang; Jin Woo Koh; Young Uk Kim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.