Literature DB >> 3406845

Pressure changes following constriction of the cauda equina. An experimental study in situ.

N Schönström1, T Hansson.   

Abstract

During routine autopsies in 11 cadavers, the intact dural sac, including its nerve roots, was circumferentially constricted by a clamp while the pressure under the clamp among the nerve roots was recorded simultaneously. The first sign of a pressure increase--the critical size--occurred at a cross-sectional area of the cauda equina of 77 +/- 13 mm2. To achieve a pressure increase of 50 mm Hg, the cross-sectional area of the cauda equina had to be further constricted at an average of 19 +/- 8%. The corresponding constriction needed to achieve a pressure of 100 mm Hg was 26 +/- 8%. The results indicated that constriction of the cauda equina to a size less than 75 mm2 probably will affect the normal function of the nerve roots of the cauda.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3406845     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198804000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  17 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The narrowing of the lumbar spinal canal during loaded MRI: the effects of the disc and ligamentum flavum.

Authors:  Tommy Hansson; Nobuyuki Suzuki; Hanna Hebelka; Arne Gaulitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Spinal Stenosis-What's New?

Authors:  R S Gamburd
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1990-10

4.  Long-term results of surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pär Slätis; Antti Malmivaara; Markku Heliövaara; Päivi Sainio; Arto Herno; Jyrki Kankare; Seppo Seitsalo; Kaj Tallroth; Veli Turunen; Paul Knekt; Heikki Hurri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Changes in dural sac caliber with standing MRI improve correlation with symptoms of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Yvonne Yan On Lau; Ryan Ka Lok Lee; James Francis Griffith; Carol Lai Yee Chan; Sheung Wai Law; Kin On Kwok
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Diagnostic value of the nerve root sedimentation sign, a radiological sign using magnetic resonance imaging, for detecting lumbar spinal stenosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Peigen Xie; Wei Zhang; Yang Yang; Limin Rong
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 7.  Lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Stephane Genevay; Steven J Atlas
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.098

8.  Early postoperative MRI in detecting hematoma and dural compression after lumbar spinal decompression: prospective study of asymptomatic patients in comparison to patients requiring surgical revision.

Authors:  Massimo A Leonardi; M Zanetti; N Saupe; K Min
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A study of motor and sensory evoked potentials in chronic cauda equina compression of the dog.

Authors:  N H Kim; I H Yang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Comparison of the oswestry disability index and magnetic resonance imaging findings in lumbar canal stenosis: an observational study.

Authors:  Vijay G Goni; Aravind Hampannavar; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan; Paramjeet Singh; Pebam Sudesh; Rajesh Kumar Logithasan; Anurag Sharma; Shashidhar Bk; Radheshyam Sament
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2014-02-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.