Literature DB >> 26727925

Management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Jon Lurie1, Christy Tomkins-Lane2.   

Abstract

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) affects more than 200,000 adults in the United States, resulting in substantial pain and disability. It is the most common reason for spinal surgery in patients over 65 years. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a clinical syndrome of pain in the buttocks or lower extremities, with or without back pain. It is associated with reduced space available for the neural and vascular elements of the lumbar spine. The condition is often exacerbated by standing, walking, or lumbar extension and relieved by forward flexion, sitting, or recumbency. Clinical care and research into lumbar spinal stenosis is complicated by the heterogeneity of the condition, the lack of standard criteria for diagnosis and inclusion in studies, and high rates of anatomic stenosis on imaging studies in older people who are completely asymptomatic. The options for non-surgical management include drugs, physiotherapy, spinal injections, lifestyle modification, and multidisciplinary rehabilitation. However, few high quality randomized trials have looked at conservative management. A systematic review concluded that there is insufficient evidence to recommend any specific type of non-surgical treatment. Several different surgical procedures are used to treat patients who do not improve with non-operative therapies. Given that rapid deterioration is rare and that symptoms often wax and wane or gradually improve, surgery is almost always elective and considered only if sufficiently bothersome symptoms persist despite trials of less invasive interventions. Outcomes (leg pain and disability) seem to be better for surgery than for non-operative treatment, but the evidence is heterogeneous and often of limited quality. © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2015.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26727925      PMCID: PMC6887476          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h6234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  153 in total

1.  Cauda equina dysfunction. The significance of two-level pathology.

Authors:  R W Porter; D Ward
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Disability and walking capacity in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: association with sensorimotor function, balance, and functional performance.

Authors:  Sang-I Lin; Ruey-Mo Lin
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Comparison of radiologic signs and clinical symptoms of spinal stenosis.

Authors:  C Martina Lohman; Kaj Tallroth; Jyrki A Kettunen; Karl-August Lindgren
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 4.  Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Antti Malmivaara; Francisco Kovacs; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Liisa Salmi; Heikki Kröger; Juan Andrade; Rosa Jiménez; Antti Tapaninaho; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Radiologic criteria for the diagnosis of spinal stenosis: results of a Delphi survey.

Authors:  Nadja Mamisch; Martin Brumann; Juerg Hodler; Ulrike Held; Florian Brunner; Johann Steurer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  Diagnostic clinical prediction rules for specific subtypes of low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Robin Haskins; Peter G Osmotherly; Darren A Rivett
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Quantification of changes in gait characteristics associated with intermittent claudication in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Koutatsu Nagai; Tomoki Aoyama; Minoru Yamada; Masanori Izeki; Shunsuke Fujibayashi; Mitsuru Takemoto; Shu Nishiguchi; Tadao Tsuboyama; Masashi Neo
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2014-06

Review 8.  Nonoperative treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with neurogenic claudication: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlo Ammendolia; Kent Stuber; Linda K de Bruin; Andrea D Furlan; Carol A Kennedy; Yoga Raja Rampersaud; Ivan A Steenstra; Victoria Pennick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  1997 Volvo Award winner in clinical studies. Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis: a prospective, randomized study comparing decompressive laminectomy and arthrodesis with and without spinal instrumentation.

Authors:  J S Fischgrund; M Mackay; H N Herkowitz; R Brower; D M Montgomery; L T Kurz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 10.  Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fabio Zaina; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Eugene Carragee; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-29
View more
  103 in total

Review 1.  Advances in tissue state recognition in spinal surgery: a review.

Authors:  Hao Qu; Yu Zhao
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Dimensions of the spinous process and interspinous space: a morphometric study.

Authors:  Guang-Xun Lin; Tsz-King Suen; Javier Quillo-Olvera; Kutbuddin Akbary; Jung-Woo Hur; Eun Kim; Eun-Jin Park; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Correlation of texture analysis of paraspinal musculature on MRI with different clinical endpoints: Lumbar Stenosis Outcome Study (LSOS).

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Ulrike Held; Mazda Farshad; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Texture analysis of paraspinal musculature in MRI of the lumbar spine: analysis of the lumbar stenosis outcome study (LSOS) data.

Authors:  Manoj Mannil; Jakob M Burgstaller; Arjun Thanabalasingam; Sebastian Winklhofer; Michael Betz; Ulrike Held; Roman Guggenberger
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 5.  [Diagnostics and conservative treatment of cervical and lumbar spinal stenosis].

Authors:  A Hug; S Hähnel; N Weidner
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.214

6.  Correlation between the Oswestry Disability Index and objective measurements of walking capacity and performance in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Annette Bennedsgaard Jespersen; Malin Eleonora Av Kák Gustafsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Which Regional Pain Rating Best Predicts Patient-Reported Improvement in Lumbar Radiculopathy?

Authors:  Mark C Bicket; Paul F Pasquina; Steven P Cohen
Journal:  Pain Pract       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 3.183

8.  Interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression-surgical technique and early clinical results.

Authors:  Zeinab Birjandian; Samuel Emerson; Albert E Telfeian; Christoph P Hofstetter
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

9.  Priapism associated with lumbar stenosis: case report and literature review.

Authors:  Noah Michael Linwood Nichols; Ketan Yerneni; Antoine B Chiu; Alex Y Lu; Lee A Tan
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

10.  Energy Impairments in Older Adults With Low Back Pain and Radiculopathy: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Peter C Coyle; Jenifer M Pugliese; J Megan Sions; Mark S Eskander; Jennifer A Schrack; Gregory E Hicks
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.966

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.