Literature DB >> 2396180

Measurements of the normal lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Segmental study of L3-L4 and L4-L5 related to the height of the subject.

P Gouzien1, C Cazalbou, B Boyer, P Darodes de Tailly, Y Guenec, B Sénécail.   

Abstract

Computed tomography measurements of the main diameters and cross section areas of the lumbar vertebral canal and the lower end of the dural sac at the L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels were made in 34 young male adults who were free of symptoms. This study shows a statistically significant correlation between the height of the subject and the cross sectional area of the canal and the dural sac, and the interpedicular diameter. The determination of regression coefficients enabled an estimate to be made of the mean values of these parameters in relation to height, the actual values having a normal distribution around these means. This study suggest that the areas, when narrowing is suspected, should be interpreted as a function of the height of the subject.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2396180     DOI: 10.1007/bf01623341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  14 in total

1.  Measurements of the lumbar spinal canal in 2 racial groups.

Authors:  S Eisenstein
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  CT measurement of the normal cervical and lumbar spinal canal in Chinese.

Authors:  Y L Zeng; W Wang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 2.628

3.  [The dural sheath in the sitting and standing position during saccoradiculography. Apropos of 150 cases].

Authors:  A Chevrot; A M Dupont; C Vallée; F Gires; M Wybier; M Ben Hamouda; G Pallardy
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1988 Jun-Jul

4.  [Segmentation of the lumbar radicular canal].

Authors:  J P Chirossel; G Crouzet; S Kechaou; J G Passagia; A Louveau; P Mercier
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.553

5.  Morphometry of lower lumbar vertebrae as seen on CT scans: newly recognized characteristics.

Authors:  J J van Schaik; H Verbiest; F D van Schaik
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis.

Authors:  N F Bolender; N S Schönström; D M Spengler
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Dimensions of the spinal canal in individuals symptomatic and non-symptomatic for sciatica: a CT study.

Authors:  J T Wilmink; J H Korte; L Penning
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 2.804

8.  Morphometric analysis of the thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicles, anatomo-radiologic study.

Authors:  D Marchesi; E Schneider; P Glauser; M Aebi
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  [Tomodensitometric aspects of the narrow lumbar canal].

Authors:  G Crouzet; A Vasdev; J P Chirossel; C Petit; M Geindre
Journal:  J Radiol       Date:  1983 Jun-Jul

10.  Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography.

Authors:  C G Ullrich; E F Binet; M G Sanecki; S A Kieffer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  4 in total

1.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The vertebral foramen: a report concerning its contents.

Authors:  F de Peretti; I Hovorka; P Ganansia; J M Puch; A Bourgeon; C Argenson
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar spine configuration.

Authors:  J Abbas; K Hamoud; H May; O Hay; B Medlej; Y Masharawi; N Peled; I Hershkovitz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Lumbar spinal canal MRI diameter is smaller in herniated disc cauda equina syndrome patients.

Authors:  Nina S Korse; Mark C Kruit; Wilco C Peul; Carmen L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.