Literature DB >> 3968115

Role of computed tomography and myelography in the diagnosis of central spinal stenosis.

N F Bolender, N S Schönström, D M Spengler.   

Abstract

In order to evaluate radiographic methods for diagnosing central lumbar stenosis, we reviewed the computed tomography scans and myelograms of twenty-four patients who underwent surgical decompression for central lumbar stenosis. In the diagnosis of central lumbar stenosis, the measurement of the anterior-posterior diameter of the osseous canal by computed tomography was less reliable than the measurement of the dural sac by myelography. The dimensions of the canal derived from computed tomography provided a correct diagnosis in 20 per cent of the patients, while myelography was accurate 83 per cent of the time. The effectiveness of computed tomography was improved when the cross-sectional area of the dural sac was measured. We suggest that a narrow dural sac, demonstrated by myelography or by computed tomography, reliably indicates central spinal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3968115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  41 in total

1.  Dynamic changes in the dural sac cross-sectional area on axial loaded MR imaging: is there a difference between degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis?

Authors:  H Ozawa; H Kanno; Y Koizumi; N Morozumi; T Aizawa; T Kusakabe; Y Ishii; E Itoi
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-02-09       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Lumbar spinal canal stenosis-special features.

Authors:  P Gopinathan
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-06-16

3.  The nerve root sedimentation sign for differential diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective, consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Liangming Zhang; Ruiqiang Chen; Bin Liu; Wei Zhang; Yeqing Zhu; Limin Rong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  A new grading system of lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI: an easy and reliable method.

Authors:  Guen Young Lee; Young Lee Guen; Joon Woo Lee; Woo Lee Joon; Hee Seok Choi; Seok Choi Hee; Kyoung-Jin Oh; Oh Kyoung-Jin; Heung Sik Kang; Sik Kang Heung
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  The diagnostic value of a treadmill test in predicting lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Thomas Barz; Markus Melloh; Lukas Staub; Christoph Roeder; Jörn Lange; Franz-Georg Smiszek; Jean-Claude Theis; Harry R Merk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Quantitative ultrasound measurements of the calcaneus in the prediction of lumbar spine degeneration.

Authors:  M Mariconda; G Lotti; R Fava; R Midolo; C Longo; C Milano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Measurements of the normal lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography. Segmental study of L3-L4 and L4-L5 related to the height of the subject.

Authors:  P Gouzien; C Cazalbou; B Boyer; P Darodes de Tailly; Y Guenec; B Sénécail
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  A novel method for the quantitative evaluation of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Fengyu Zheng; James C Farmer; Harvinder S Sandhu; Patrick F O'Leary
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2006-09

9.  Computed tomography-evaluated features of spinal degeneration: prevalence, intercorrelation, and association with self-reported low back pain.

Authors:  Leonid Kalichman; David H Kim; Ling Li; Ali Guermazi; David J Hunter
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Comparison of the predictive value of myelography, computed tomography and MRI on the treadmill test in lumbar spinal stenosis.

Authors:  Eun-Su Moon; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Dong-Eun Shin; Jung-Won Ha; Dong-Jun Shim; Yoon-Hae Kwak; Kwang-Il Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-12-31       Impact factor: 2.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.