Literature DB >> 26120046

Reading during the composition of multi-sentence texts: an eye-movement study.

Mark Torrance1, Roger Johansson2, Victoria Johansson3, Åsa Wengelin4.   

Abstract

Writers composing multi-sentence texts have immediate access to a visual representation of what they have written. Little is known about the detail of writers' eye movements within this text during production. We describe two experiments in which competent adult writers' eye movements were tracked while performing short expository writing tasks. These are contrasted with conditions in which participants read and evaluated researcher-provided texts. Writers spent a mean of around 13 % of their time looking back into their text. Initiation of these look-back sequences was strongly predicted by linguistically important boundaries in their ongoing production (e.g., writers were much more likely to look back immediately prior to starting a new sentence). 36 % of look-back sequences were associated with sustained reading and the remainder with less patterned forward and backward saccades between words ("hopping"). Fixation and gaze durations and the presence of word-length effects suggested lexical processing of fixated words in both reading and hopping sequences. Word frequency effects were not present when writers read their own text. Findings demonstrate the technical possibility and potential value of examining writers' fixations within their just-written text. We suggest that these fixations do not serve solely, or even primarily, in monitoring for error, but play an important role in planning ongoing production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26120046     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-015-0683-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  23 in total

1.  High level processing scope in spoken sentence production.

Authors:  M Smith; L Wheeldon
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1999-12-17

Review 2.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

3.  Eye-hand span and coding of text during copytyping.

Authors:  A W Inhoff; D Briihl; G Bohemier; J Wang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Word frequency during copytyping.

Authors:  A W Inhoff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Combined eyetracking and keystroke-logging methods for studying cognitive processes in text production.

Authors:  Asa Wengelin; Mark Torrance; Kenneth Holmqvist; Sol Simpson; David Galbraith; Victoria Johansson; Roger Johansson
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-05

6.  Task relevance induces momentary changes in the functional visual field during reading.

Authors:  Johanna K Kaakinen; Jukka Hyönä
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2014-01-03

7.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

8.  The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.

Authors:  Nathaniel J Smith; Roger Levy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-06-06

9.  Visuospatial processing in memory for word location in writing.

Authors:  Nathalie Le Bigot; Jean-Michel Passerault; Thierry Olive
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2012

10.  Ways of looking ahead: hierarchical planning in language production.

Authors:  Eun-Kyung Lee; Sarah Brown-Schmidt; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-09-14
View more
  1 in total

1.  The process-disruption hypothesis: how spelling and typing skill affects written composition process and product.

Authors:  Vibeke Rønneberg; Mark Torrance; Per Henning Uppstad; Christer Johansson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-01-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.