Literature DB >> 16796300

Effects of open-set and closed-set task demands on spoken word recognition.

Cynthia G Clopper1, David B Pisoni, Adam T Tierney.   

Abstract

Closed-set tests of spoken word recognition are frequently used in clinical settings to assess the speech discrimination skills of hearing-impaired listeners, particularly children. Speech scientists have reported robust effects of lexical competition and talker variability in open-set tasks but not closed-set tasks, suggesting that closed-set tests of spoken word recognition may not be valid assessments of speech recognition skills. The goal of the current study was to explore some of the task demands that might account for this fundamental difference between open-set and closed-set tasks. In a series of four experiments, we manipulated the number and nature of the response alternatives. Results revealed that as more highly confusable foils were added to the response alternatives, lexical competition and talker variability effects emerged in closed-set tests of spoken word recognition. These results demonstrate a close coupling between task demands and lexical competition effects in lexical access and spoken word recognition processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16796300      PMCID: PMC3324094          DOI: 10.3766/jaaa.17.5.4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol        ISSN: 1050-0545            Impact factor:   1.664


  25 in total

1.  Tri-word presentations with phonemic scoring for practical high-reliability speech recognition assessment.

Authors:  Stanley A Gelfand
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Multiple-choice intelligibility tests.

Authors:  J W BLACK
Journal:  J Speech Hear Disord       Date:  1957-06

3.  Talker variability and recognition memory: instance-specific and voice-specific effects.

Authors:  Winston D Goh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  What information enables a listener to map a talker's vowel space?

Authors:  R R Verbrugge; W Strange; D P Shankweiler; T R Edman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Some considerations in evaluating spoken word recognition by normal-hearing, noise-masked normal-hearing, and cochlear implant listeners. I: The effects of response format.

Authors:  M S Sommers; K I Kirk; D B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Priming Lexical Neighbors of Spoken Words: Effects of Competition and Inhibition.

Authors:  Stephen D Goldinger; Paul A Luce; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  1989-10-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition.

Authors:  J W Mullennix; D B Pisoni; C S Martin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The four alternative auditory feature test (FAAF)--linguistic and psychometric properties of the material with normative data in noise.

Authors:  J R Foster; M P Haggard
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1987-08

9.  A masking noise with speech-envelope characteristics for studying intelligibility.

Authors:  Y Horii; A S House; G W Hughes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Spoken word recognition processes and the gating paradigm.

Authors:  F Grosjean
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1980-10
View more
  24 in total

1.  Speaker-independent factors affecting the perception of foreign accent in a second language.

Authors:  Susannah V Levi; Stephen J Winters; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Lexical and indexical cues in masking by competing speech.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Richard L Freyman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Misperceptions of spoken words: data from a random sample of American English words.

Authors:  Robert Albert Felty; Adam Buchwald; Thomas M Gruenenfelder; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Effect of response context and masker type on word recognition in school-age children and adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The pictures who shall not be named: Empirical support for benefits of preview in the Visual World Paradigm.

Authors:  Keith S Apfelbaum; Jamie Klein-Packard; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Extrinsic Cognitive Load Impairs Spoken Word Recognition in High- and Low-Predictability Sentences.

Authors:  Cynthia R Hunter; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Construct Validity of the Viking Speech Scale.

Authors:  Lindsay Pennington; Katherine C Hustad
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-06-12       Impact factor: 0.849

9.  Visual speech fills in both discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Rachel P McAlpine; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2017-07-20

10.  Mechanisms of interaction in speech production.

Authors:  Melissa Baese-Berk; Matthew Goldrick
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2009-05-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.