Literature DB >> 21076861

Neuronavigation increases the physiologic and behavioral effects of low-frequency rTMS of primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.

S Bashir1, D Edwards, A Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can exert local and inter-hemispheric neuromodulatory effects on cortical excitability. These physiologic effects can translate into changes in motor behavior, and may offer valuable therapeutic interventions in recovery from stroke. Neuronavigated TMS can maximize accurate and consistent targeting of a given cortical region, but is a lot more involved that conventional TMS. We aimed to assess whether neuronavigation enhances the physiologic and behavioral effects of low-frequency rTMS. Ten healthy subjects underwent two experimental sessions during which they received 1600 pulses of either navigated or non-navigated 1 Hz rTMS at 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) intensity over the motor cortical representation for left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. We compared the effects of navigated and non-navigated rTMS on motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) to single-pulse TMS, intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) by paired-pulse TMS, and performance in various behavioral tasks (index finger tapping, simple reaction time and grip strength tasks). Following navigated rTMS, the amplitude of MEPs elicited from the contralateral (unstimulated) motor cortex was significantly increased, and was associated with an increase in ICF and a trend to decrease in ICI. In contrast, non-navigated rTMS elicited nonsignificant changes, most prominently ipsilateral to rTMS. Behaviorally, navigated rTMS significantly improved reaction time RT and pinch force with the hand ipsilateral to stimulation. Non-navigated rTMS lead to similar behavioral trends, although the effects did not reach significance. In summary, navigated rTMS leads to more robust modulation of the contralateral (unstimulated) hemisphere resulting in physiologic and behavioral effects. Our findings highlight the spatial specificity of inter-hemispheric TMS effects, illustrate the superiority of navigated rTMS for certain applications, and have implications for therapeutic applications of rTMS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21076861      PMCID: PMC3589808          DOI: 10.1007/s10548-010-0165-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Topogr        ISSN: 0896-0267            Impact factor:   3.020


  43 in total

1.  Effects of low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor excitability and basic motor behavior.

Authors:  W Muellbacher; U Ziemann; B Boroojerdi; M Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Disinhibition of the contralateral motor cortex by low-frequency rTMS.

Authors:  Christian Plewnia; Martin Lotze; Christian Gerloff
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2003-03-24       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurology.

Authors:  Masahito Kobayashi; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 44.182

4.  Modulation of excitability of human motor cortex (M1) by 1 Hz transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralateral M1.

Authors:  H M Schambra; L Sawaki; L G Cohen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  TMS and drugs.

Authors:  Ulf Ziemann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; Denise M Roth; Michel R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  L Kiers; D Cros; K H Chiappa; J Fang
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12

8.  Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex.

Authors:  U Ziemann; J C Rothwell; M C Ridding
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1996-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations.

Authors:  V Mathiowetz; K Weber; G Volland; N Kashman
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Ketamine increases human motor cortex excitability to transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  V Di Lazzaro; A Oliviero; P Profice; M A Pennisi; F Pilato; G Zito; M Dileone; R Nicoletti; P Pasqualetti; P A Tonali
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-17       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  27 in total

1.  High-frequency focal repetitive cerebellar stimulation induces prolonged increases in human pharyngeal motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Dipesh H Vasant; Emilia Michou; Satish Mistry; John C Rothwell; Shaheen Hamdy
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Nonphysiological factors in navigated TMS studies; confounding covariates and valid intracortical estimates.

Authors:  Sein Schmidt; Rouven Bathe-Peters; Robert Fleischmann; Maria Rönnefarth; Michael Scholz; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Neuronavigation-guided Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Aphasia.

Authors:  Woo-Jin Kim; Soo Jung Hahn; Won-Seok Kim; Nam-Jong Paik
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 4.  Rehabilitating the addicted brain with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Marco Diana; Tommi Raij; Miriam Melis; Aapo Nummenmaa; Lorenzo Leggio; Antonello Bonci
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 34.870

5.  Optimal number of pulses as outcome measures of neuronavigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Won Hyuk Chang; Peter J Fried; Sadhvi Saxena; Ali Jannati; Joyce Gomes-Osman; Yun-Hee Kim; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Microcircuit mechanisms involved in paired associative stimulation-induced depression of corticospinal excitability.

Authors:  David Weise; Jakob Mann; Michael Ridding; Kevin Eskandar; Martin Huss; Jost-Julian Rumpf; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Paolo Mazzone; Federico Ranieri; Joseph Classen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Understanding the role of the primary somatosensory cortex: Opportunities for rehabilitation.

Authors:  M R Borich; S M Brodie; W A Gray; S Ionta; L A Boyd
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 8.  Brain stimulation in the treatment of chronic neuropathic and non-cancerous pain.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Andre Machado
Journal:  J Pain       Date:  2012-04-07       Impact factor: 5.820

9.  Enhanced motor function and its neurophysiological correlates after navigated low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the contralesional motor cortex in stroke.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Marine Vernet; Umer Najib; Jennifer Perez; Miguel Alonso-Alonso; Mark Knobel; Woo-Kyoung Yoo; Dylan Edwards; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 10.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an investigative tool for motor dysfunction and recovery in stroke: an overview for neurorehabilitation clinicians.

Authors:  Mar Cortes; Randie M Black-Schaffer; Dylan J Edwards
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2012-05-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.