Literature DB >> 35355218

Cerebellar noninvasive neuromodulation influences the reactivity of the contralateral primary motor cortex and surrounding areas: a TMS-EMG-EEG study.

Rocchi L1,2, Spampinato DA1,3, Pezzopane V3, Orth M4, Bisiacchi Ps5, Rothwell Jc1, Casula Ep6,7.   

Abstract

Understanding cerebellar-cortical physiological interactions is of fundamental importance to advance the efficacy of neurorehabilitation strategies for patients with cerebellar damage. Previous works have aimed to modulate this pathway by applying transcranial electrical or magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the cerebellum and probing the resulting changes in the primary motor cortex (M1) excitability with motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). While these protocols produce changes in cerebellar excitability, their ability to modulate MEPs has produced inconsistent results, mainly due to the MEP being a highly variable outcome measure that is susceptible to fluctuations in the excitability of M1 neurons and spinal interneurons. To overcome this limitation, we combined TMS with electroencephalography (EEG) to directly record TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) and oscillations from the scalp. In three sessions, we applied intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS), cathodal direct current stimulation (c-DC) or sham stimulation to modulate cerebellar activity. To assess the effects on M1 and nearby cortex, we recorded TMS-EEG and MEPs before, immediately after (T1) and 15 min (T2) following cerebellar neuromodulation. We found that cerebellar iTBS immediately increased TMS-induced alpha oscillations and produced lasting facilitatory effects on TEPs, whereas c-DC immediately decreased TMS-induced alpha oscillations and reduced TEPs. We also found increased MEP following iTBS but not after c-DC. All of the TMS-EEG measures showed high test-retest repeatability. Overall, this work importantly shows that cerebellar neuromodulation influences both cortical and corticospinal physiological measures; however, they are more pronounced and detailed when utilizing TMS-EEG outcome measures. These findings highlight the advantage of using TMS-EEG over MEPs when assessing the effects of neuromodulation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain oscillations; Cerebellum; Electroencephalography; Motor cortex; TMS-EEG; Transcranial evoked potentials; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Year:  2022        PMID: 35355218     DOI: 10.1007/s12311-022-01398-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cerebellum        ISSN: 1473-4222            Impact factor:   3.847


  43 in total

1.  Modulatory effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the cerebellum on motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  Brigida Fierro; Giuseppe Giglia; Antonio Palermo; Carla Pecoraro; Simona Scalia; Filippo Brighina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; Denise M Roth; Michel R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  A case of congenital hypoplasia of the left cerebellar hemisphere and ipsilateral cortical myoclonus.

Authors:  Lorenzo Rocchi; Anna Latorre; Jaime Ibanez Pereda; Danny Spampinato; Katlyn E Brown; John Rothwell; Kailash Bhatia
Journal:  Mov Disord       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 10.338

4.  Cerebellar processing of sensory inputs primes motor cortex plasticity.

Authors:  T Popa; B Velayudhan; C Hubsch; S Pradeep; E Roze; M Vidailhet; S Meunier; A Kishore
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2012-02-20       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Modulation of cerebellar excitability by polarity-specific noninvasive direct current stimulation.

Authors:  Joseph M Galea; Gowri Jayaram; Loni Ajagbe; Pablo Celnik
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Changes in intracortical circuits of the human motor cortex following theta burst stimulation of the lateral cerebellum.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Francesco Mori; Barbara Marconi; Claudia Codecà; Cristiano Pecchioli; Silvia Salerno; Sara Torriero; Emanuele Lo Gerfo; Pablo Mir; Massimiliano Oliveri; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-27       Impact factor: 3.708

7.  Cerebellar loops with motor cortex and prefrontal cortex of a nonhuman primate.

Authors:  Roberta M Kelly; Peter L Strick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Exploring the connectivity between the cerebellum and motor cortex in humans.

Authors:  Zafiris J Daskalakis; Guillermo O Paradiso; Bruce K Christensen; Paul B Fitzgerald; Carolyn Gunraj; Robert Chen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-03-26       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  The effects of cerebellar stimulation on the motor cortical excitability in neurological disorders: a review.

Authors:  Nobue K Iwata; Yoshikazu Ugawa
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 3.648

Review 10.  Non-invasive brain stimulation as a tool to study cerebellar-M1 interactions in humans.

Authors:  Sara Tremblay; Duncan Austin; Ricci Hannah; John C Rothwell
Journal:  Cerebellum Ataxias       Date:  2016-11-16
View more
  1 in total

1.  The effect of stimulation frequency on transcranial evoked potentials.

Authors:  Giorgio Leodori; Lorenzo Rocchi; Marco Mancuso; Maria Ilenia De Bartolo; Viola Baione; Matteo Costanzo; Daniele Belvisi; Antonella Conte; Giovanni Defazio; Alfredo Berardelli
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 1.264

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.