Literature DB >> 7507428

Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

L Kiers1, D Cros, K H Chiappa, J Fang.   

Abstract

We studied the effect of stimulus intensity, coil size, mental alertness and prestimulus muscle contraction on the variability of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) produced by magnetic cortical stimulation (MCS). In 5 healthy subjects we delivered MCS either with a circular coil centered at the vertex or a figure-8 coil centered over the motor cortex hand area, recording from first dorsal interosseous. With the subject at rest or exerting 5% maximum voluntary contraction, 30 consecutive stimuli were given at 4 stimulus intensities (SIs) in 10% increments above resting motor threshold. Concurrent mental arithmetic constituted mental alertness. Spectral analysis was performed on data from 300 consecutive stimuli. The variability of MEP response size was inversely related to stimulus intensity, prestimulus voluntary muscle contraction, the recruitment of motoneurons and the size of the field generated by the magnetic coil. The MEP variability was larger than and not correlated with the variability of the H-reflex. Fast Fourier transformation and cross-correlation analysis did not identify a consistent dominant frequency, suggesting that the variability in MEP size is essentially random. We suggest that the variability in MEP response is caused by constant, rapid, spontaneous fluctuations in corticospinal and segmental motoneuron excitability levels. Any maneuver that raises this level or increases the probability of motoneuron firing will decrease MEP variability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 7507428     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90115-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  106 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation coregistered with MRI: a comparison of a guided versus blind stimulation technique and its effect on evoked compound muscle action potentials.

Authors:  L D Gugino; J R Romero; L Aglio; D Titone; M Ramirez; A Pascual-Leone; E Grimson; N Weisenfeld; R Kikinis; M E Shenton
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Age and sex differences in human motor cortex input-output characteristics.

Authors:  Julia B Pitcher; Kirstin M Ogston; Timothy S Miles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 3.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Fumiko Maeda; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2003-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Neuronavigation increases the physiologic and behavioral effects of low-frequency rTMS of primary motor cortex in healthy subjects.

Authors:  S Bashir; D Edwards; A Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 3.020

5.  Impaired facilitation of motor evoked potentials in incomplete spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Philipp Diehl; Uta Kliesch; Volker Dietz; Armin Curt
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 4.849

6.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation depends on muscle activation.

Authors:  Warren G Darling; Steven L Wolf; Andrew J Butler
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Extensive training of elementary finger tapping movements changes the pattern of motor cortex excitability.

Authors:  S Koeneke; K Lutz; U Herwig; U Ziemann; L Jäncke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 8.  [Cortical excitability in schizophrenia. Studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation].

Authors:  T Wobrock; D Kadovic; P Falkai
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.214

9.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 10.  The use of transcranial magnetic stimulation to evaluate cortical excitability of lower limb musculature: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Trisha M Kesar; James W Stinear; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.406

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.