Literature DB >> 7489684

Trial-to-trial variability of corticospinal volleys in human subjects.

D Burke1, R Hicks, J Stephen, I Woodforth, M Crawford.   

Abstract

The trial-to-trial variability of the different components of corticospinal volleys evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation of the motor cortex using a constant stimulus intensity was measured from epidural recordings during surgery to correct scoliosis. The recordings were made when there was no operative interference, and blood pressure, temperature, ventilation and anaesthetic regimen were stable. A simple D wave with a single negative peak of 10-30 microV amplitude was recorded in 4 patients. It varied little in amplitude (S.D.s < 8% for 100 consecutive single responses). In 4 patients the stimulus was adjusted to produce a complex D wave with 3 components, the earliest 2 of which arise from subcortical/brain-stem sites. The variability of amplitude of these components was high (S.D.s of 13-50%), but the variability of latency was low (S.D.s of 2-3%). Eighteen I waves were recorded in 6 of the subjects. Their variability from trial to trial was similar to that of the components of the complex D wave. It is argued that there would be greater trial-to-trial variability of the corticospinal volley in the awake state, particularly when the stimulus was magnetic rather than electrical. Explanations for changes in the compound muscle action potential produced by transcranial stimulation, electrical or magnetic, must take into account that a constant stimulus does not evoke an identical descending volley.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7489684     DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00005-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  12 in total

1.  Cerebral Monitoring in the Operating Room and the Intensive Care Unit: An introductory for the clinician and a guide for the novice wanting to open a window to the brain. Part III: Spinal cord evoked potentials.

Authors:  Enno Freye
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Factors influencing the magnitude and reproducibility of corticomotor excitability changes induced by paired associative stimulation.

Authors:  Martin V Sale; Michael C Ridding; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Trial-to-trial size variability of motor-evoked potentials. A study using the triple stimulation technique.

Authors:  Kai M Rösler; Denise M Roth; Michel R Magistris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Time-varying coupling of EEG oscillations predicts excitability fluctuations in the primary motor cortex as reflected by motor evoked potentials amplitude: an EEG-TMS study.

Authors:  Florinda Ferreri; Fabrizio Vecchio; David Ponzo; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  A low-cost system for coil tracking during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Edward P Washabaugh; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  A novel model incorporating two variability sources for describing motor evoked potentials.

Authors:  Stefan M Goetz; Bruce Luber; Sarah H Lisanby; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Muscle responses to transcranial stimulation in man depend on background oscillatory activity.

Authors:  W Kyle Mitchell; Mark R Baker; Stuart N Baker
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Different Stimulation Frequencies Alter Synchronous Fluctuations in Motor Evoked Potential Amplitude of Intrinsic Hand Muscles-a TMS Study.

Authors:  Martin V Sale; Nigel C Rogasch; Michael A Nordstrom
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Intraoperative Motor-Evoked Potential Disappearance versus Amplitude-Decrement Alarm Criteria During Cervical Spinal Surgery: A Long-Term Prognosis.

Authors:  Dong Gun Kim; Young Doo Choi; Seung Hyun Jin; Chi Heon Kim; Kwang Woo Lee; Kyung Seok Park; Chun Kee Chung; Sung Min Kim
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.077

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.