Literature DB >> 18230867

The influence of linguistic content on the Lombard effect.

Rupal Patel1, Kevin W Schell.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Lombard effect describes the tendency for speakers to increase pitch, intensity, and duration in the presence of noise. It is unclear whether these modifications are uniformly applied across all words within an utterance or whether information-bearing content words are further enhanced compared with function words. In the present study, the authors investigated the influence of linguistic content on acoustic modifications made to speech in noise.
METHOD: Sixteen speaker-listener pairs engaged in an interactive cooperative game in quiet, 60 dB of multitalker noise, and 90 dB of multitalker noise. Speaker productions were analyzed to examine differences in fundamental frequency (F(0)), intensity, and duration of target words in sentences across noise conditions.
RESULTS: Proportional increases in F(0,) intensity, and duration were noted for all word types as noise increased from quiet to 60 dB. From quiet to 90 dB, content words that referred to agents, objects, and locations were disproportionately elongated compared with function words. Additionally, agents were further enhanced by increased F(0).
CONCLUSIONS: At moderate noise levels, most word types appear to be uniformly boosted in F(0), intensity, and duration. As noise increases, linguistic content shapes the extent of the Lombard effect, with F(0) and duration serving as primary cues for marking information-bearing word types.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18230867     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2008/016)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  16 in total

1.  The impact of rate reduction and increased loudness on fundamental frequency characteristics in dysarthria.

Authors:  Kris Tjaden; Greg Wilding
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2010-10-12       Impact factor: 0.849

2.  The effects of stimulus complexity on the preattentive processing of self-generated and nonself voices: An ERP study.

Authors:  Tatiana Conde; Óscar F Gonçalves; Ana P Pinheiro
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Children's perception of speech produced in a two-talker background.

Authors:  Mallory Baker; Emily Buss; Adam Jacks; Crystal Taylor; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Evidence that the Lombard effect is frequency-specific in humans.

Authors:  Lauren M Stowe; Edward J Golob
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats.

Authors:  Steffen R Hage; Tinglei Jiang; Sean W Berquist; Jiang Feng; Walter Metzner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sensorimotor integration on a rapid time scale.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Ninad B Kothari; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Kevin J Reilly; Erin Archibald; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Vowel and Sibilant Production in Noise: Effects of Noise Frequency and Phonological Similarity.

Authors:  Kevin J Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Prosodic adaptations to pitch perturbation in running speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Caroline Niziolek; Kevin Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Supra-Segmental Changes in Speech Production as a Result of Spectral Feedback Degradation: Comparison with Lombard Speech.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Casserly; Yeling Wang; Nicholas Celestin; Lily Talesnick; David B Pisoni
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 1.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.